Stress Test Evaluation of Transformer-based Models in Natural Language Understanding Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.06261v2
• Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:45:48 GMT
• Title: Stress Test Evaluation of Transformer-based Models in Natural Language Understanding Tasks
• Authors: Carlos Aspillaga, Andr\'es Carvallo, Vladimir Araujo
• Abstract summary: This work evaluates three Transformer-based models (RoBERTa, XLNet, and BERT) in Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Question Answering (QA) tasks. Our experiments reveal that RoBERTa, XLNet and BERT are more robust than recurrent neural network models to stress tests for both NLI and QA tasks.
• Score: 3.2442879131520126
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: There has been significant progress in recent years in the field of Natural Language Processing thanks to the introduction of the Transformer architecture. Current state-of-the-art models, via a large number of parameters and pre-training on massive text corpus, have shown impressive results on several downstream tasks. Many researchers have studied previous (non-Transformer) models to understand their actual behavior under different scenarios, showing that these models are taking advantage of clues or failures of datasets and that slight perturbations on the input data can severely reduce their performance. In contrast, recent models have not been systematically tested with adversarial-examples in order to show their robustness under severe stress conditions. For that reason, this work evaluates three Transformer-based models (RoBERTa, XLNet, and BERT) in Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Question Answering (QA) tasks to know if they are more robust or if they have the same flaws as their predecessors. As a result, our experiments reveal that RoBERTa, XLNet and BERT are more robust than recurrent neural network models to stress tests for both NLI and QA tasks. Nevertheless, they are still very fragile and demonstrate various unexpected behaviors, thus revealing that there is still room for future improvement in this field.

Related papers

• On Robustness of Finetuned Transformer-based NLP Models [11.063628128069736]
  We characterize changes between pretrained and finetuned language model representations across layers using two metrics: CKA and STIR. GPT-2 representations are more robust than BERT and T5 across multiple types of input perturbations. This study provides valuable insights into perturbation-specific weaknesses of popular Transformer-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T18:25:18Z)
• Optimizing Non-Autoregressive Transformers with Contrastive Learning [74.46714706658517]
  Non-autoregressive Transformers (NATs) reduce the inference latency of Autoregressive Transformers (ATs) by predicting words all at once rather than in sequential order. In this paper, we propose to ease the difficulty of modality learning via sampling from the model distribution instead of the data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T04:20:13Z)
• Transformer-based approaches to Sentiment Detection [55.41644538483948]
  We examined the performance of four different types of state-of-the-art transformer models for text classification. The RoBERTa transformer model performs best on the test dataset with a score of 82.6% and is highly recommended for quality predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T17:12:03Z)
• Leveraging Pre-trained Models for Failure Analysis Triplets Generation [0.0]
  We leverage the attention mechanism of pre-trained causal language models such as Transformer model for the downstream task of generating Failure Analysis Triplets (FATs) We observe that Generative Pre-trained Transformer 2 (GPT2) outperformed other transformer model for the failure analysis triplet generation (FATG) task. In particular, we observe that GPT2 (trained on 1.5B parameters) outperforms pre-trained BERT, BART and GPT3 by a large margin on ROUGE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T17:21:15Z)
• Confident Adaptive Language Modeling [95.45272377648773]
  CALM is a framework for dynamically allocating different amounts of compute per input and generation timestep. We demonstrate the efficacy of our framework in reducing compute -- potential speedup of up to $times 3$ -- while provably maintaining high performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-14T17:00:19Z)
• PLATON: Pruning Large Transformer Models with Upper Confidence Bound of Weight Importance [114.1541203743303]
  We propose PLATON, which captures the uncertainty of importance scores by upper confidence bound (UCB) of importance estimation. We conduct extensive experiments with several Transformer-based models on natural language understanding, question answering and image classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-25T05:38:39Z)
• Improving Non-autoregressive Generation with Mixup Training [51.61038444990301]
  We present a non-autoregressive generation model based on pre-trained transformer models. We propose a simple and effective iterative training method called MIx Source and pseudo Target. Our experiments on three generation benchmarks including question generation, summarization and paraphrase generation, show that the proposed framework achieves the new state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T13:04:21Z)
• Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Language Models to Input Perturbations [7.064032374579076]
  In this study, we design and implement various types of character-level and word-level perturbation methods to simulate noisy input texts. We investigate the ability of high-performance language models such as BERT, XLNet, RoBERTa, and ELMo in handling different types of input perturbations. The results suggest that language models are sensitive to input perturbations and their performance can decrease even when small changes are introduced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-27T12:31:17Z)
• Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theory [53.755064720563]
  We evaluate 29 datasets using predictions from 18 pretrained Transformer models on individual test examples. We find that Quoref, HellaSwag, and MC-TACO are best suited for distinguishing among state-of-the-art models. We also observe span selection task format, which is used for QA datasets like QAMR or SQuAD2.0, is effective in differentiating between strong and weak models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:33:53Z)
• Recoding latent sentence representations -- Dynamic gradient-based activation modification in RNNs [0.0]
  In RNNs, encoding information in a suboptimal way can impact the quality of representations based on later elements in the sequence. I propose an augmentation to standard RNNs in form of a gradient-based correction mechanism. I conduct different experiments in the context of language modeling, where the impact of using such a mechanism is examined in detail.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-03T17:54:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.