HybridCite: A Hybrid Model for Context-Aware Citation Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.06406v2
• Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 16:49:44 GMT
• Title: HybridCite: A Hybrid Model for Context-Aware Citation Recommendation
• Authors: Michael F\"arber, Ashwath Sampath
• Abstract summary: We develop citation recommendation approaches based on embeddings, topic modeling, and information retrieval techniques. We combine, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, the best-performing algorithms into a semi-genetic hybrid recommender system. Our evaluation results show that a hybrid model containing embedding and information retrieval-based components outperforms its individual components and further algorithms by a large margin.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Citation recommendation systems aim to recommend citations for either a complete paper or a small portion of text called a citation context. The process of recommending citations for citation contexts is called local citation recommendation and is the focus of this paper. Firstly, we develop citation recommendation approaches based on embeddings, topic modeling, and information retrieval techniques. We combine, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, the best-performing algorithms into a semi-genetic hybrid recommender system for citation recommendation. We evaluate the single approaches and the hybrid approach offline based on several data sets, such as the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) and the MAG in combination with arXiv and ACL. We further conduct a user study for evaluating our approaches online. Our evaluation results show that a hybrid model containing embedding and information retrieval-based components outperforms its individual components and further algorithms by a large margin.

Related papers

• ALiiCE: Evaluating Positional Fine-grained Citation Generation [54.19617927314975]
  We propose ALiiCE, the first automatic evaluation framework for fine-grained citation generation. Our framework first parses the sentence claim into atomic claims via dependency analysis and then calculates citation quality at the atomic claim level. We evaluate the positional fine-grained citation generation performance of several Large Language Models on two long-form QA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T09:16:14Z)
• Directed Criteria Citation Recommendation and Ranking Through Link Prediction [0.32885740436059047]
  Our model uses transformer-based graph embeddings to encode the meaning of each document, presented as a node within a citation network. We show that the semantic representations that our model generates can outperform other content-based methods in recommendation and ranking tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T20:47:38Z)
• ILCiteR: Evidence-grounded Interpretable Local Citation Recommendation [31.259805200946175]
  We introduce the evidence-grounded local citation recommendation task, where the target latent space comprises evidence spans for recommending specific papers. Unlike past formulations that simply output recommendations, ILCiteR retrieves ranked lists of evidence span and recommended paper pairs. We contribute a novel dataset for the evidence-grounded local citation recommendation task and demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed conditional neural rank-ensembling approach for re-ranking evidence spans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T17:38:05Z)
• Impression-Aware Recommender Systems [57.38537491535016]
  Novel data sources bring new opportunities to improve the quality of recommender systems. Researchers may use impressions to refine user preferences and overcome the current limitations in recommender systems research. We present a systematic literature review on recommender systems using impressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:16:02Z)
• Tag-Aware Document Representation for Research Paper Recommendation [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a hybrid approach that leverages deep semantic representation of research papers based on social tags assigned by users. The proposed model is effective in recommending research papers even when the rating data is very sparse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T09:13:07Z)
• Towards generating citation sentences for multiple references with intent control [86.53829532976303]
  We build a novel generation model with the Fusion-in-Decoder approach to cope with multiple long inputs. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed approaches provide much more comprehensive features for generating citation sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T15:32:24Z)
• Recommending Multiple Positive Citations for Manuscript via Content-Dependent Modeling and Multi-Positive Triplet [6.7854900381386845]
  We propose a novel scientific paper modeling for citation recommendations, namely Multi-Positive BERT Model for Citation Recommendation (MP-BERT4CR) The proposed approach has the following advantages: First, the proposed multi-positive objectives are effective to recommend multiple positive candidates. MP-BERT4CR are also effective in retrieving the full list of co-citations, and historically low-frequent co-citation pairs compared with the prior works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T04:09:31Z)
• Evaluating Document Representations for Content-based Legal Literature Recommendations [6.4815284696225905]
  Legal recommender systems are typically evaluated in small-scale user study without any public available benchmark datasets. We evaluate text-based (e.g., fastText, Transformers), citation-based (e.g., DeepWalk, Poincar'e), and hybrid methods. Our experiments show that document representations from averaged fastText word vectors (trained on legal corpora) yield the best results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T15:48:19Z)
• Enhancing Scientific Papers Summarization with Citation Graph [78.65955304229863]
  We redefine the task of scientific papers summarization by utilizing their citation graph. We construct a novel scientific papers summarization dataset Semantic Scholar Network (SSN) which contains 141K research papers in different domains. Our model can achieve competitive performance when compared with the pretrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T11:13:35Z)
• Learning Neural Textual Representations for Citation Recommendation [7.227232362460348]
  We propose a novel approach to citation recommendation using a deep sequential representation of the documents (Sentence-BERT) cascaded with Siamese and triplet networks in a submodular scoring function. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first approach to combine deep representations and submodular selection for a task of citation recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-08T12:38:50Z)
• Context-Based Quotation Recommendation [60.93257124507105]
  We propose a novel context-aware quote recommendation system. It generates a ranked list of quotable paragraphs and spans of tokens from a given source document. We conduct experiments on a collection of speech transcripts and associated news articles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-17T17:49:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.