Tag-Aware Document Representation for Research Paper Recommendation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.03660v1
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:13:07 GMT
- Title: Tag-Aware Document Representation for Research Paper Recommendation
- Authors: Hebatallah A. Mohamed, Giuseppe Sansonetti, Alessandro Micarelli
- Abstract summary: We propose a hybrid approach that leverages deep semantic representation of research papers based on social tags assigned by users.
The proposed model is effective in recommending research papers even when the rating data is very sparse.
- Score: 68.8204255655161
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Finding online research papers relevant to one's interests is very
challenging due to the increasing number of publications. Therefore,
personalized research paper recommendation has become a significant and timely
research topic. Collaborative filtering is a successful recommendation
approach, which exploits the ratings given to items by users as a source of
information for learning to make accurate recommendations. However, the ratings
are often very sparse as in the research paper domain, due to the huge number
of publications growing every year. Therefore, more attention has been drawn to
hybrid methods that consider both ratings and content information.
Nevertheless, most of the hybrid recommendation approaches that are based on
text embedding have utilized bag-of-words techniques, which ignore word order
and semantic meaning. In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach that
leverages deep semantic representation of research papers based on social tags
assigned by users. The experimental evaluation is performed on CiteULike, a
real and publicly available dataset. The obtained findings show that the
proposed model is effective in recommending research papers even when the
rating data is very sparse.
Related papers
- exHarmony: Authorship and Citations for Benchmarking the Reviewer Assignment Problem [11.763640675057076]
We develop a benchmark dataset for evaluating the reviewer assignment problem without needing explicit labels.
We benchmark various methods, including traditional lexical matching, static neural embeddings, and contextualized neural embeddings.
Our results indicate that while traditional methods perform reasonably well, contextualized embeddings trained on scholarly literature show the best performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-11T16:35:04Z) - An Instance-based Plus Ensemble Learning Method for Classification of Scientific Papers [2.0794749869068005]
This paper introduces a novel approach that combines instance-based learning and ensemble learning techniques for classifying scientific papers.
Experiments show that the proposed classification method is effective and efficient in categorizing papers into various research areas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-21T19:42:15Z) - Rs4rs: Semantically Find Recent Publications from Top Recommendation System-Related Venues [0.2812395851874055]
Rs4rs is a web application designed to perform semantic search on recent papers from top conferences and journals related to Recommender Systems.
Rs4rs addresses these issues by providing a user-friendly platform where researchers can input their topic of interest and receive a list of recent, relevant papers from top Recommender Systems venues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-09T12:53:06Z) - A Survey on Data Selection for Language Models [148.300726396877]
Data selection methods aim to determine which data points to include in a training dataset.
Deep learning is mostly driven by empirical evidence and experimentation on large-scale data is expensive.
Few organizations have the resources for extensive data selection research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T18:54:35Z) - Impression-Aware Recommender Systems [53.48892326556546]
We present a systematic literature review on recommender systems using impressions.
We define a theoretical framework to delimit recommender systems using impressions and a novel paradigm for personalized recommendations, called impression-aware recommender systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T16:16:02Z) - Yes-Yes-Yes: Donation-based Peer Reviewing Data Collection for ACL
Rolling Review and Beyond [58.71736531356398]
We present an in-depth discussion of peer reviewing data, outline the ethical and legal desiderata for peer reviewing data collection, and propose the first continuous, donation-based data collection workflow.
We report on the ongoing implementation of this workflow at the ACL Rolling Review and deliver the first insights obtained with the newly collected data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-27T11:02:43Z) - Learning Neural Textual Representations for Citation Recommendation [7.227232362460348]
We propose a novel approach to citation recommendation using a deep sequential representation of the documents (Sentence-BERT) cascaded with Siamese and triplet networks in a submodular scoring function.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first approach to combine deep representations and submodular selection for a task of citation recommendation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-08T12:38:50Z) - From Standard Summarization to New Tasks and Beyond: Summarization with
Manifold Information [77.89755281215079]
Text summarization is the research area aiming at creating a short and condensed version of the original document.
In real-world applications, most of the data is not in a plain text format.
This paper focuses on the survey of these new summarization tasks and approaches in the real-world application.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-10T14:59:36Z) - A Survey on Knowledge Graph-Based Recommender Systems [65.50486149662564]
We conduct a systematical survey of knowledge graph-based recommender systems.
We focus on how the papers utilize the knowledge graph for accurate and explainable recommendation.
We introduce datasets used in these works.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-28T02:26:30Z) - Citation Recommendation: Approaches and Datasets [20.47628019708079]
Citation recommendation describes the task of recommending citations for a given text.
In recent years, several approaches and evaluation data sets have been presented.
No literature survey has been conducted explicitly on citation recommendation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-17T13:59:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.