SetRank: A Setwise Bayesian Approach for Collaborative Ranking from Implicit Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09841v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 06:40:48 GMT
• Title: SetRank: A Setwise Bayesian Approach for Collaborative Ranking from Implicit Feedback
• Authors: Chao Wang, Hengshu Zhu, Chen Zhu, Chuan Qin, Hui Xiong
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel setwise Bayesian approach for collaborative ranking, namely SetRank, to accommodate the characteristics of implicit feedback in recommender system. Specifically, SetRank aims at maximizing the posterior probability of novel setwise preference comparisons. We also present the theoretical analysis of SetRank to show that the bound of excess risk can be proportional to $sqrtM/N$.
• Score: 50.13745601531148
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The recent development of online recommender systems has a focus on collaborative ranking from implicit feedback, such as user clicks and purchases. Different from explicit ratings, which reflect graded user preferences, the implicit feedback only generates positive and unobserved labels. While considerable efforts have been made in this direction, the well-known pairwise and listwise approaches have still been limited by various challenges. Specifically, for the pairwise approaches, the assumption of independent pairwise preference is not always held in practice. Also, the listwise approaches cannot efficiently accommodate "ties" due to the precondition of the entire list permutation. To this end, in this paper, we propose a novel setwise Bayesian approach for collaborative ranking, namely SetRank, to inherently accommodate the characteristics of implicit feedback in recommender system. Specifically, SetRank aims at maximizing the posterior probability of novel setwise preference comparisons and can be implemented with matrix factorization and neural networks. Meanwhile, we also present the theoretical analysis of SetRank to show that the bound of excess risk can be proportional to $\sqrt{M/N}$, where $M$ and $N$ are the numbers of items and users, respectively. Finally, extensive experiments on four real-world datasets clearly validate the superiority of SetRank compared with various state-of-the-art baselines.

Related papers

• Adaptively Learning to Select-Rank in Online Platforms [34.258659206323664]
  This research addresses the challenge of adaptively ranking items from a candidate pool for heterogeneous users. We develop a user response model that considers diverse user preferences and the varying effects of item positions. Experiments conducted on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate our algorithm outperforms the baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T15:33:48Z)
• Found in the Middle: Permutation Self-Consistency Improves Listwise Ranking in Large Language Models [63.714662435555674]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit positional bias in how they use context. We propose permutation self-consistency, a form of self-consistency over ranking list outputs of black-box LLMs. Our approach improves scores from conventional inference by up to 7-18% for GPT-3.5 and 8-16% for LLaMA v2 (70B)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T17:59:02Z)
• Replace Scoring with Arrangement: A Contextual Set-to-Arrangement Framework for Learning-to-Rank [40.81502990315285]
  Learning-to-rank is a core technique in the top-N recommendation task, where an ideal ranker would be a mapping from an item set to an arrangement. Most existing solutions fall in the paradigm of probabilistic ranking principle (PRP), i.e., first score each item in the candidate set and then perform a sort operation to generate the top ranking list. We propose Set-To-Arrangement Ranking (STARank), a new framework directly generates the permutations of the candidate items without the need for individually scoring and sort operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-05T12:22:26Z)
• Bipartite Ranking Fairness through a Model Agnostic Ordering Adjustment [54.179859639868646]
  We propose a model agnostic post-processing framework xOrder for achieving fairness in bipartite ranking. xOrder is compatible with various classification models and ranking fairness metrics, including supervised and unsupervised fairness metrics. We evaluate our proposed algorithm on four benchmark data sets and two real-world patient electronic health record repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T07:42:44Z)
• Recommendation Systems with Distribution-Free Reliability Guarantees [83.80644194980042]
  We show how to return a set of items rigorously guaranteed to contain mostly good items. Our procedure endows any ranking model with rigorous finite-sample control of the false discovery rate. We evaluate our methods on the Yahoo! Learning to Rank and MSMarco datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T17:49:25Z)
• Doubly Robust Off-Policy Evaluation for Ranking Policies under the Cascade Behavior Model [11.101369123145588]
  Off-policy evaluation for ranking policies enables performance estimation of new ranking policies using only logged data. Previous studies introduce some assumptions on user behavior to make the item space tractable. We propose the Cascade Doubly Robust estimator, which assumes that a user interacts with items sequentially from the top position in a ranking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T12:42:33Z)
• Unbiased Pairwise Learning to Rank in Recommender Systems [4.058828240864671]
  Unbiased learning to rank algorithms are appealing candidates and have already been applied in many applications with single categorical labels. We propose a novel unbiased LTR algorithm to tackle the challenges, which innovatively models position bias in the pairwise fashion. Experiment results on public benchmark datasets and internal live traffic show the superior results of the proposed method for both categorical and continuous labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T06:04:59Z)
• Adaptive Sampling for Heterogeneous Rank Aggregation from Noisy Pairwise Comparisons [85.5955376526419]
  In rank aggregation problems, users exhibit various accuracy levels when comparing pairs of items. We propose an elimination-based active sampling strategy, which estimates the ranking of items via noisy pairwise comparisons. We prove that our algorithm can return the true ranking of items with high probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T13:51:55Z)
• Set2setRank: Collaborative Set to Set Ranking for Implicit Feedback based Recommendation [59.183016033308014]
  In this paper, we explore the unique characteristics of the implicit feedback and propose Set2setRank framework for recommendation. Our proposed framework is model-agnostic and can be easily applied to most recommendation prediction approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-16T08:06:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.