Benchmarking Network Embedding Models for Link Prediction: Are We Making
Progress?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11522v5
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:48:59 GMT
- Title: Benchmarking Network Embedding Models for Link Prediction: Are We Making
Progress?
- Authors: Alexandru Mara, Jefrey Lijffijt and Tijl De Bie
- Abstract summary: We shed light on the state-of-the-art of network embedding methods for link prediction.
We show, using a consistent evaluation pipeline, that only thin progress has been made over the last years.
We argue that standardized evaluation tools can repair this situation and boost future progress in this field.
- Score: 84.43405961569256
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Network embedding methods map a network's nodes to vectors in an embedding
space, in such a way that these representations are useful for estimating some
notion of similarity or proximity between pairs of nodes in the network. The
quality of these node representations is then showcased through results of
downstream prediction tasks. Commonly used benchmark tasks such as link
prediction, however, present complex evaluation pipelines and an abundance of
design choices. This, together with a lack of standardized evaluation setups
can obscure the real progress in the field. In this paper, we aim to shed light
on the state-of-the-art of network embedding methods for link prediction and
show, using a consistent evaluation pipeline, that only thin progress has been
made over the last years. The newly conducted benchmark that we present here,
including 17 embedding methods, also shows that many approaches are
outperformed even by simple heuristics. Finally, we argue that standardized
evaluation tools can repair this situation and boost future progress in this
field.
Related papers
- On Discprecncies between Perturbation Evaluations of Graph Neural
Network Attributions [49.8110352174327]
We assess attribution methods from a perspective not previously explored in the graph domain: retraining.
The core idea is to retrain the network on important (or not important) relationships as identified by the attributions.
We run our analysis on four state-of-the-art GNN attribution methods and five synthetic and real-world graph classification datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-01T02:03:35Z) - New Perspectives on the Evaluation of Link Prediction Algorithms for
Dynamic Graphs [12.987894327817159]
We introduce novel visualization methods that can yield insight into prediction performance and the dynamics of temporal networks.
We validate empirically, on datasets extracted from recent benchmarks, that the error is typically not evenly distributed across different data segments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-30T11:57:07Z) - Evaluating Graph Neural Networks for Link Prediction: Current Pitfalls
and New Benchmarking [66.83273589348758]
Link prediction attempts to predict whether an unseen edge exists based on only a portion of edges of a graph.
A flurry of methods have been introduced in recent years that attempt to make use of graph neural networks (GNNs) for this task.
New and diverse datasets have also been created to better evaluate the effectiveness of these new models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-18T01:58:59Z) - Towards Motion Forecasting with Real-World Perception Inputs: Are
End-to-End Approaches Competitive? [93.10694819127608]
We propose a unified evaluation pipeline for forecasting methods with real-world perception inputs.
Our in-depth study uncovers a substantial performance gap when transitioning from curated to perception-based data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-15T17:03:14Z) - Refined Edge Usage of Graph Neural Networks for Edge Prediction [51.06557652109059]
We propose a novel edge prediction paradigm named Edge-aware Message PassIng neuRal nEtworks (EMPIRE)
We first introduce an edge splitting technique to specify use of each edge where each edge is solely used as either the topology or the supervision.
In order to emphasize the differences between pairs connected by supervision edges and pairs unconnected, we further weight the messages to highlight the relative ones that can reflect the differences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-25T23:19:56Z) - Line Graph Contrastive Learning for Link Prediction [4.876567687745239]
We propose a Line Graph Contrastive Learning (LGCL) method to obtain multiview information.
With experiments on six public datasets, LGCL outperforms current benchmarks on link prediction tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-25T06:57:00Z) - Temporal Graph Network Embedding with Causal Anonymous Walks
Representations [54.05212871508062]
We propose a novel approach for dynamic network representation learning based on Temporal Graph Network.
For evaluation, we provide a benchmark pipeline for the evaluation of temporal network embeddings.
We show the applicability and superior performance of our model in the real-world downstream graph machine learning task provided by one of the top European banks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-19T15:39:52Z) - A Self-Attention Network based Node Embedding Model [17.10479440152652]
We propose SANNE -- a novel unsupervised embedding model.
Our SANNE aims to produce plausible embeddings not only for present nodes, but also for newly unseen nodes.
Experimental results show that the proposed SANNE obtains state-of-the-art results for the node classification task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T09:46:10Z) - ALPINE: Active Link Prediction using Network Embedding [20.976178936255927]
We propose ALPINE (Active Link Prediction usIng Network Embedding) for link prediction based on network embedding.
We show that ALPINE is scalable, and boosts link prediction accuracy with far fewer queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-04T11:09:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.