Comparison of Distal Teacher Learning with Numerical and Analytical Methods to Solve Inverse Kinematics for Rigid-Body Mechanisms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00225v1
• Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:55:45 GMT
• Title: Comparison of Distal Teacher Learning with Numerical and Analytical Methods to Solve Inverse Kinematics for Rigid-Body Mechanisms
• Authors: Tim von Oehsen, Alexander Fabisch, Shivesh Kumar and Frank Kirchner
• Abstract summary: We argue that one of the first proposed machine learning (ML) solutions to inverse kinematics -- distal teaching (DT) -- is actually good enough when combined with differentiable programming libraries. We analyze solve rate, accuracy, sample efficiency and scalability. With enough training data and relaxed precision requirements, DT has a better solve rate and is faster than state-of-the-art numerical solvers for a 15-DoF mechanism.
• Score: 67.80123919697971
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Several publications are concerned with learning inverse kinematics, however, their evaluation is often limited and none of the proposed methods is of practical relevance for rigid-body kinematics with a known forward model. We argue that for rigid-body kinematics one of the first proposed machine learning (ML) solutions to inverse kinematics -- distal teaching (DT) -- is actually good enough when combined with differentiable programming libraries and we provide an extensive evaluation and comparison to analytical and numerical solutions. In particular, we analyze solve rate, accuracy, sample efficiency and scalability. Further, we study how DT handles joint limits, singularities, unreachable poses, trajectories and provide a comparison of execution times. The three approaches are evaluated on three different rigid body mechanisms with varying complexity. With enough training data and relaxed precision requirements, DT has a better solve rate and is faster than state-of-the-art numerical solvers for a 15-DoF mechanism. DT is not affected by singularities while numerical solutions are vulnerable to them. In all other cases numerical solutions are usually better. Analytical solutions outperform the other approaches by far if they are available.

Related papers

• PICL: Physics Informed Contrastive Learning for Partial Differential Equations [7.136205674624813]
  We develop a novel contrastive pretraining framework that improves neural operator generalization across multiple governing equations simultaneously. A combination of physics-informed system evolution and latent-space model output are anchored to input data and used in our distance function. We find that physics-informed contrastive pretraining improves accuracy for the Fourier Neural Operator in fixed-future and autoregressive rollout tasks for the 1D and 2D Heat, Burgers', and linear advection equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T17:32:22Z)
• Spectral operator learning for parametric PDEs without data reliance [6.7083321695379885]
  We introduce a novel operator learning-based approach for solving parametric partial differential equations (PDEs) without the need for data harnessing. The proposed framework demonstrates superior performance compared to existing scientific machine learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T12:37:15Z)
• On Robust Numerical Solver for ODE via Self-Attention Mechanism [82.95493796476767]
  We explore training efficient and robust AI-enhanced numerical solvers with a small data size by mitigating intrinsic noise disturbances. We first analyze the ability of the self-attention mechanism to regulate noise in supervised learning and then propose a simple-yet-effective numerical solver, Attr, which introduces an additive self-attention mechanism to the numerical solution of differential equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-05T01:39:21Z)
• Neural Operator: Is data all you need to model the world? An insight into the impact of Physics Informed Machine Learning [13.050410285352605]
  We provide an insight into how data-driven approaches can complement conventional techniques to solve engineering and physics problems. We highlight a novel and fast machine learning-based approach to learning the solution operator of a PDE operator learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T23:29:33Z)
• Tunable Complexity Benchmarks for Evaluating Physics-Informed Neural Networks on Coupled Ordinary Differential Equations [64.78260098263489]
  In this work, we assess the ability of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to solve increasingly-complex coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) We show that PINNs eventually fail to produce correct solutions to these benchmarks as their complexity increases. We identify several reasons why this may be the case, including insufficient network capacity, poor conditioning of the ODEs, and high local curvature, as measured by the Laplacian of the PINN loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T15:01:32Z)
• Learning to correct spectral methods for simulating turbulent flows [6.110864131646294]
  We show that a hybrid of classical numerical techniques and machine learning can offer significant improvements over either approach alone. Specifically, we develop ML-augmented spectral solvers for three common partial differential equations of fluid dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T17:13:28Z)
• Fast Distributionally Robust Learning with Variance Reduced Min-Max Optimization [85.84019017587477]
  Distributionally robust supervised learning is emerging as a key paradigm for building reliable machine learning systems for real-world applications. Existing algorithms for solving Wasserstein DRSL involve solving complex subproblems or fail to make use of gradients. We revisit Wasserstein DRSL through the lens of min-max optimization and derive scalable and efficiently implementable extra-gradient algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-27T16:56:09Z)
• Large-scale Neural Solvers for Partial Differential Equations [48.7576911714538]
  Solving partial differential equations (PDE) is an indispensable part of many branches of science as many processes can be modelled in terms of PDEs. Recent numerical solvers require manual discretization of the underlying equation as well as sophisticated, tailored code for distributed computing. We examine the applicability of continuous, mesh-free neural solvers for partial differential equations, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) We discuss the accuracy of GatedPINN with respect to analytical solutions -- as well as state-of-the-art numerical solvers, such as spectral solvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-08T13:26:51Z)
• Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solvers [26.444103444634994]
  We show that machine learning can improve the solution accuracy by correcting for effects not captured by the discretized PDE. We find that previously used learning approaches are significantly outperformed by methods that integrate the solver into the training loop. This provides the model with realistic input distributions that take previous corrections into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-30T18:00:03Z)
• An Online Method for A Class of Distributionally Robust Optimization with Non-Convex Objectives [54.29001037565384]
  We propose a practical online method for solving a class of online distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problems. Our studies demonstrate important applications in machine learning for improving the robustness of networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T20:19:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.