A Liquid Perspective on Democratic Choice

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12393v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:43:01 GMT
• Title: A Liquid Perspective on Democratic Choice
• Authors: Bryan Ford
• Abstract summary: The idea of liquid democracy responds to a widely-felt desire to make democracy more "fluid" and continuously participatory. This paper develops and explores the "liquid" notion and what it might mean for purposes of enhancing voter choice. The goal of this paper is to disentangle and further develop some of the many concepts and goals that liquid democracy ideas often embody.
• Score: 1.3833241949666322
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The idea of liquid democracy responds to a widely-felt desire to make democracy more "fluid" and continuously participatory. Its central premise is to enable users to employ networked technologies to control and delegate voting power, to approximate the ideal of direct democracy in a scalable fashion that accounts for time and attention limits. There are many potential definitions, meanings, and ways to implement liquid democracy, however, and many distinct purposes to which it might be deployed. This paper develops and explores the "liquid" notion and what it might mean for purposes of enhancing voter choice by spreading voting power, improving proportional representation systems, simplifying or aiding voters in their choice, or scaling direct democracy through specialization. The goal of this paper is to disentangle and further develop some of the many concepts and goals that liquid democracy ideas often embody, to explore their justification with respect to existing democratic traditions such as transferable voting and political parties, and to explore potential risks in liquid democracy systems and ways to address them.

Related papers

• ElectionSim: Massive Population Election Simulation Powered by Large Language Model Driven Agents [70.17229548653852]
  We introduce ElectionSim, an innovative election simulation framework based on large language models. We present a million-level voter pool sampled from social media platforms to support accurate individual simulation. We also introduce PPE, a poll-based presidential election benchmark to assess the performance of our framework under the U.S. presidential election scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T05:25:50Z)
• From Experts to the Public: Governing Multimodal Language Models in Politically Sensitive Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  This paper examines the governance of large language models (MM-LLMs) through individual and collective deliberation. We conducted a two-step study: first, interviews with 10 journalists established a baseline understanding of expert video interpretation; second, 114 individuals from the general public engaged in deliberation using Inclusive.AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models [54.48283690603358]
  This study seeks to identify and quantify biases in simulating political samples with Large Language Models. Using the GPT-3.5-Turbo model, we leverage data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, Zuobiao dataset, and China Family Panel Studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T05:52:26Z)
• Generative AI Voting: Fair Collective Choice is Resilient to LLM Biases and Inconsistencies [21.444936180683147]
  We show for the first time in real-world a proportional representation of voters in direct democracy. We also show that fair ballot aggregation methods, such as equal shares, prove to be a win-win: fairer voting outcomes for humans with fairer AI representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T01:41:48Z)
• Enabling the Digital Democratic Revival: A Research Program for Digital Democracy [68.02254954746476]
  This white paper outlines a long-term scientific vision for the development of digital-democracy technology. It arose from the Lorentz Center Workshop on Algorithmic Technology for Democracy'' (Leiden, October 2022)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T10:12:49Z)
• Learning to Manipulate under Limited Information [44.99833362998488]
  We trained over 70,000 neural networks of 26 sizes to manipulate against 8 different voting methods. We find that some voting methods, such as Borda, are highly manipulable by networks with limited information, while others, such as Instant Runoff, are not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T18:49:50Z)
• Liquid Democracy in DPoS Blockchains [4.42985313903391]
  Liquid democracy, also known as delegative voting, allows voters to vote directly or delegate their voting power to others. This paper explores the practical implementation of liquid democracy in Delegated-Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) blockchain systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-03T06:04:11Z)
• As Time Goes By: Adding a Temporal Dimension Towards Resolving Delegations in Liquid Democracy [16.219158909792256]
  Our work takes a first step to integrate a time horizon into decision-making problems in Liquid Democracy systems. Our approach, via a computational complexity analysis, exploits concepts and tools from temporal graph theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T15:46:45Z)
• Pandering in a Flexible Representative Democracy [24.462078390546246]
  We examine the resilience of two democratic voting systems to pandering within a single round and across multiple rounds. For each voting system, our analysis centers on the types of strategies candidates employ and how voters update their views of candidates based on how the candidates have pandered in the past.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T02:19:28Z)
• Foundations for Grassroots Democratic Metaverse [25.12065973868763]
  This paper offers a vision, a theoretical framework, and an architecture for a grassroots network of autonomous, people-owned, people-operated, and people-governed digital communities. It also charts a roadmap towards realizing it, and identifies unexplored territory for further research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T12:16:09Z)
• InfoBot: Transfer and Exploration via the Information Bottleneck [105.28380750802019]
  A central challenge in reinforcement learning is discovering effective policies for tasks where rewards are sparsely distributed. We propose to learn about decision states from prior experience. We find that this simple mechanism effectively identifies decision states, even in partially observed settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-01-30T15:33:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.