A Norm Emergence Framework for Normative MAS -- Position Paper

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.02575v1
• Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:42:01 GMT
• Title: A Norm Emergence Framework for Normative MAS -- Position Paper
• Authors: Andreasa Morris-Martin and Marina De Vos and Julian Padget
• Abstract summary: We propose a framework for the emergence of norms within a normative multiagent system. We make the case that, similarly, a norm has emerged in a normative MAS when a percentage of agents adopt the norm. We put forward a framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS, while special-purpose synthesizer agents formulate new norms or revisions in response to these requests.
• Score: 0.90238471756546
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Norm emergence is typically studied in the context of multiagent systems (MAS) where norms are implicit, and participating agents use simplistic decision-making mechanisms. These implicit norms are usually unconsciously shared and adopted through agent interaction. A norm is deemed to have emerged when a threshold or predetermined percentage of agents follow the "norm". Conversely, in normative MAS, norms are typically explicit and agents deliberately share norms through communication or are informed about norms by an authority, following which an agent decides whether to adopt the norm or not. The decision to adopt a norm by the agent can happen immediately after recognition or when an applicable situation arises. In this paper, we make the case that, similarly, a norm has emerged in a normative MAS when a percentage of agents adopt the norm. Furthermore, we posit that agents themselves can and should be involved in norm synthesis, and hence influence the norms governing the MAS, in line with Ostrom's eight principles. Consequently, we put forward a framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS, that allows participating agents to propose/request changes to the normative system, while special-purpose synthesizer agents formulate new norms or revisions in response to these requests. Synthesizers must collectively agree that the new norm or norm revision should proceed, and then finally be approved by an "Oracle". The normative system is then modified to incorporate the norm.

Related papers

• RegNLP in Action: Facilitating Compliance Through Automated Information Retrieval and Answer Generation [51.998738311700095]
  Regulatory documents, characterized by their length, complexity and frequent updates, are challenging to interpret. RegNLP is a multidisciplinary subfield aimed at simplifying access to and interpretation of regulatory rules and obligations. ObliQA dataset contains 27,869 questions derived from the Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) financial regulation document collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T14:44:19Z)
• An Open Knowledge Graph-Based Approach for Mapping Concepts and Requirements between the EU AI Act and International Standards [1.9142148274342772]
  The EU's AI Act will shift the focus of such organizations toward conformance with the technical requirements for regulatory compliance. This paper offers a simple and repeatable mechanism for mapping the terms and requirements relevant to normative statements in regulations and standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T18:21:09Z)
• Are language models rational? The case of coherence norms and belief revision [63.78798769882708]
  We consider logical coherence norms as well as coherence norms tied to the strength of belief in language models. We argue that rational norms tied to coherence do apply to some language models, but not to others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:36:21Z)
• SoFA: Shielded On-the-fly Alignment via Priority Rule Following [90.32819418613407]
  This paper introduces a novel alignment paradigm, priority rule following, which defines rules as the primary control mechanism in each dialog. We present PriorityDistill, a semi-automated approach for distilling priority following signals from simulations to ensure robust rule integration and adherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T09:52:27Z)
• Learning and Sustaining Shared Normative Systems via Bayesian Rule Induction in Markov Games [2.307051163951559]
  We build learning agents that cooperate flexibly with the human institutions they are embedded in. By assuming shared norms, a newly introduced agent can infer the norms of an existing population from observations of compliance and violation. Since agents can bootstrap common knowledge of the norms, this leads the norms to be widely adhered to, enabling new entrants to rapidly learn those norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T21:58:40Z)
• On the Importance of Gradient Norm in PAC-Bayesian Bounds [92.82627080794491]
  We propose a new generalization bound that exploits the contractivity of the log-Sobolev inequalities. We empirically analyze the effect of this new loss-gradient norm term on different neural architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T12:49:20Z)
• Bridging between LegalRuleML and TPTP for Automated Normative Reasoning (extended version) [77.34726150561087]
  LegalRuleML is an XML-based representation framework for modeling and exchanging normative rules. The TPTP input and output formats are general-purpose standards for the interaction with automated reasoning systems. We provide a bridge between the two communities by defining a logic-pluralistic normative reasoning language based on the TPTP format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-12T08:42:34Z)
• Socially Intelligent Genetic Agents for the Emergence of Explicit Norms [0.0]
  We address the emergence of explicit norms by developing agents who provide and reason about explanations for norm violations. These agents use a genetic algorithm to produce norms and reinforcement learning to learn the values of these norms. We find that applying explanations leads to norms that provide better cohesion and goal satisfaction for the agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-07T18:48:48Z)
• The Complexity of Data-Driven Norm Synthesis and Revision [19.235739945526877]
  We consider the problem of synthesising a norm from traces of agent behaviour. Each trace is labelled with whether the behaviour satisfies the system objective. We show that the norm synthesis problem is NP-complete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-05T17:15:00Z)
• Normative Disagreement as a Challenge for Cooperative AI [56.34005280792013]
  We argue that typical cooperation-inducing learning algorithms fail to cooperate in bargaining problems. We develop a class of norm-adaptive policies and show in experiments that these significantly increase cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-27T11:37:42Z)
• Norm Identification through Plan Recognition [22.387008072671005]
  Societal rules aim to provide a degree of behavioural stability to multi-agent societies. Many implementations of normative systems assume various combinations of the following assumptions. We develop a norm identification mechanism that uses a combination of parsing-based plan recognition and Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T11:18:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.