Norm Identification through Plan Recognition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.02627v1
• Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:18:52 GMT
• Title: Norm Identification through Plan Recognition
• Authors: Nir Oren and Felipe Meneguzzi
• Abstract summary: Societal rules aim to provide a degree of behavioural stability to multi-agent societies. Many implementations of normative systems assume various combinations of the following assumptions. We develop a norm identification mechanism that uses a combination of parsing-based plan recognition and Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning mechanisms.
• Score: 22.387008072671005
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Societal rules, as exemplified by norms, aim to provide a degree of behavioural stability to multi-agent societies. Norms regulate a society using the deontic concepts of permissions, obligations and prohibitions to specify what can, must and must not occur in a society. Many implementations of normative systems assume various combinations of the following assumptions: that the set of norms is static and defined at design time; that agents joining a society are instantly informed of the complete set of norms; that the set of agents within a society does not change; and that all agents are aware of the existing norms. When any one of these assumptions is dropped, agents need a mechanism to identify the set of norms currently present within a society, or risk unwittingly violating the norms. In this paper, we develop a norm identification mechanism that uses a combination of parsing-based plan recognition and Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning mechanisms, which operates by analysing the actions performed by other agents. While our basic mechanism cannot learn in situations where norm violations take place, we describe an extension which is able to operate in the presence of violations.

Related papers

• An Open Knowledge Graph-Based Approach for Mapping Concepts and Requirements between the EU AI Act and International Standards [1.9142148274342772]
  The EU's AI Act will shift the focus of such organizations toward conformance with the technical requirements for regulatory compliance. This paper offers a simple and repeatable mechanism for mapping the terms and requirements relevant to normative statements in regulations and standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T18:21:09Z)
• Are language models rational? The case of coherence norms and belief revision [63.78798769882708]
  We consider logical coherence norms as well as coherence norms tied to the strength of belief in language models. We argue that rational norms tied to coherence do apply to some language models, but not to others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:36:21Z)
• Learning and Sustaining Shared Normative Systems via Bayesian Rule Induction in Markov Games [2.307051163951559]
  We build learning agents that cooperate flexibly with the human institutions they are embedded in. By assuming shared norms, a newly introduced agent can infer the norms of an existing population from observations of compliance and violation. Since agents can bootstrap common knowledge of the norms, this leads the norms to be widely adhered to, enabling new entrants to rapidly learn those norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T21:58:40Z)
• Agent Alignment in Evolving Social Norms [65.45423591744434]
  We propose an evolutionary framework for agent evolution and alignment, named EvolutionaryAgent. In an environment where social norms continuously evolve, agents better adapted to the current social norms will have a higher probability of survival and proliferation. We show that EvolutionaryAgent can align progressively better with the evolving social norms while maintaining its proficiency in general tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T15:44:44Z)
• Socially Intelligent Genetic Agents for the Emergence of Explicit Norms [0.0]
  We address the emergence of explicit norms by developing agents who provide and reason about explanations for norm violations. These agents use a genetic algorithm to produce norms and reinforcement learning to learn the values of these norms. We find that applying explanations leads to norms that provide better cohesion and goal satisfaction for the agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-07T18:48:48Z)
• Transparency, Compliance, And Contestability When Code Is(n't) Law [91.85674537754346]
  Both technical security mechanisms and legal processes serve as mechanisms to deal with misbehaviour according to a set of norms. While they share general similarities, there are also clear differences in how they are defined, act, and the effect they have on subjects. This paper considers the similarities and differences between both types of mechanisms as ways of dealing with misbehaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-08T18:03:07Z)
• The Complexity of Data-Driven Norm Synthesis and Revision [19.235739945526877]
  We consider the problem of synthesising a norm from traces of agent behaviour. Each trace is labelled with whether the behaviour satisfies the system objective. We show that the norm synthesis problem is NP-complete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-05T17:15:00Z)
• Normative Disagreement as a Challenge for Cooperative AI [56.34005280792013]
  We argue that typical cooperation-inducing learning algorithms fail to cooperate in bargaining problems. We develop a class of norm-adaptive policies and show in experiments that these significantly increase cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-27T11:37:42Z)
• Robust Allocations with Diversity Constraints [65.3799850959513]
  We show that the Nash Welfare rule that maximizes product of agent values is uniquely positioned to be robust when diversity constraints are introduced. We also show that the guarantees achieved by Nash Welfare are nearly optimal within a widely studied class of allocation rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-30T11:09:31Z)
• A Norm Emergence Framework for Normative MAS -- Position Paper [0.90238471756546]
  We propose a framework for the emergence of norms within a normative multiagent system. We make the case that, similarly, a norm has emerged in a normative MAS when a percentage of agents adopt the norm. We put forward a framework for the emergence of norms within a normative MAS, while special-purpose synthesizer agents formulate new norms or revisions in response to these requests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T11:42:01Z)
• Hacia los Comit\'es de \'Etica en Inteligencia Artificial [68.8204255655161]
  It is priority to create the rules and specialized organizations that can oversight the following of such rules. This work proposes the creation, at the universities, of Ethical Committees or Commissions specialized on Artificial Intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-11T23:48:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.