Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.03705v3
• Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 07:41:46 GMT
• Title: Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Review
• Authors: Shervin Minaee, Nal Kalchbrenner, Erik Cambria, Narjes Nikzad, Meysam Chenaghlu, Jianfeng Gao
• Abstract summary: We provide a review of more than 150 deep learning based models for text classification developed in recent years. We also provide a summary of more than 40 popular datasets widely used for text classification.
• Score: 75.8403533775179
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep learning based models have surpassed classical machine learning based approaches in various text classification tasks, including sentiment analysis, news categorization, question answering, and natural language inference. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of more than 150 deep learning based models for text classification developed in recent years, and discuss their technical contributions, similarities, and strengths. We also provide a summary of more than 40 popular datasets widely used for text classification. Finally, we provide a quantitative analysis of the performance of different deep learning models on popular benchmarks, and discuss future research directions.

Related papers

• Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisions [62.12545440385489]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought substantial advancements in text generation, but their potential for enhancing classification tasks remains underexplored. We propose a framework for thoroughly investigating fine-tuning LLMs for classification, including both generation- and encoding-based approaches. We instantiate this framework in edit intent classification (EIC), a challenging and underexplored classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T20:48:28Z)
• Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough? [54.869097980761595]
  Recent foundational language models have shown state-of-the-art performance in many NLP tasks in zero- and few-shot settings. An advantage of these models over more standard approaches is the ability to understand instructions written in natural language (prompts) This makes them suitable for addressing text classification problems for domains with limited amounts of annotated instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T12:47:39Z)
• Text Classification: A Perspective of Deep Learning Methods [0.0679877553227375]
  This paper introduces deep learning-based text classification algorithms, including important steps required for text classification tasks. At the end of the article, different deep learning text classification methods are compared and summarized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T21:49:51Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Text Summarization with In-Context Learning [79.02280189976562]
  In this paper, we study the efficacy of large language models as multi-dimensional evaluators using in-context learning. Our experiments show that in-context learning-based evaluators are competitive with learned evaluation frameworks for the task of text summarization. We then analyze the effects of factors such as the selection and number of in-context examples on performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T23:27:49Z)
• Topics in the Haystack: Extracting and Evaluating Topics beyond Coherence [0.0]
  We propose a method that incorporates a deeper understanding of both sentence and document themes. This allows our model to detect latent topics that may include uncommon words or neologisms. We present correlation coefficients with human identification of intruder words and achieve near-human level results at the word-intrusion task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T12:24:25Z)
• Text classification dataset and analysis for Uzbek language [0.0]
  We first present a newly obtained dataset for Uzbek text classification, which was collected from 10 different news and press websites. We also present a comprehensive evaluation of different models, ranging from traditional bag-of-words models to deep learning architectures. Our experiments show that the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based models outperform the rule-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T11:21:24Z)
• Deep Learning Schema-based Event Extraction: Literature Review and Current Trends [60.29289298349322]
  Event extraction technology based on deep learning has become a research hotspot. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches, focusing on deep learning-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T16:32:45Z)
• Neural Ranking Models for Document Retrieval [11.886543741028127]
  Several approaches to ranking are based on traditional machine learning algorithms using a set of hand-crafted features. Deep learning models are trained end-to-end to extract features from the raw data for ranking tasks. A variety of deep learning models have been proposed, and each model presents a set of neural network components to extract features that are used for ranking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T19:30:37Z)
• A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
  The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021. We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.