A Framework for Enhancing Deep Neural Networks Against Adversarial Malware

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.07919v3
• Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:29:02 GMT
• Title: A Framework for Enhancing Deep Neural Networks Against Adversarial Malware
• Authors: Deqiang Li, Qianmu Li, Yanfang Ye, and Shouhuai Xu
• Abstract summary: We propose a defense framework to enhance the robustness of deep neural networks against adversarial malware evasion attacks. The framework wins the AICS' 2019 challenge by achieving a 76.02% accuracy, where neither the attacker (i.e., the challenge organizer) knows the framework or defense nor we (the defender) know the attacks.
• Score: 31.026476033245764
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning-based malware detection is known to be vulnerable to adversarial evasion attacks. The state-of-the-art is that there are no effective defenses against these attacks. As a response to the adversarial malware classification challenge organized by the MIT Lincoln Lab and associated with the AAAI-19 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security (AICS'2019), we propose six guiding principles to enhance the robustness of deep neural networks. Some of these principles have been scattered in the literature, but the others are introduced in this paper for the first time. Under the guidance of these six principles, we propose a defense framework to enhance the robustness of deep neural networks against adversarial malware evasion attacks. By conducting experiments with the Drebin Android malware dataset, we show that the framework can achieve a 98.49\% accuracy (on average) against grey-box attacks, where the attacker knows some information about the defense and the defender knows some information about the attack, and an 89.14% accuracy (on average) against the more capable white-box attacks, where the attacker knows everything about the defense and the defender knows some information about the attack. The framework wins the AICS'2019 challenge by achieving a 76.02% accuracy, where neither the attacker (i.e., the challenge organizer) knows the framework or defense nor we (the defender) know the attacks. This gap highlights the importance of knowing about the attack.

Related papers

• A Novel Approach to Guard from Adversarial Attacks using Stable Diffusion [0.0]
  Our proposal suggests a different approach to the AI Guardian framework. Instead of including adversarial examples in the training process, we propose training the AI system without them. This aims to create a system that is inherently resilient to a wider range of attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T04:08:15Z)
• BadCLIP: Dual-Embedding Guided Backdoor Attack on Multimodal Contrastive Learning [85.2564206440109]
  This paper reveals the threats in this practical scenario that backdoor attacks can remain effective even after defenses. We introduce the emphtoolns attack, which is resistant to backdoor detection and model fine-tuning defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T02:21:49Z)
• The Best Defense is a Good Offense: Adversarial Augmentation against Adversarial Attacks [91.56314751983133]
  $A5$ is a framework to craft a defensive perturbation to guarantee that any attack towards the input in hand will fail. We show effective on-the-fly defensive augmentation with a robustifier network that ignores the ground truth label. We also show how to apply $A5$ to create certifiably robust physical objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:07:58Z)
• Game Theoretic Mixed Experts for Combinational Adversarial Machine Learning [10.368343314144553]
  We provide a game-theoretic framework for ensemble adversarial attacks and defenses. We propose three new attack algorithms, specifically designed to target defenses with randomized transformations, multi-model voting schemes, and adversarial detector architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-26T21:35:01Z)
• Fixed Points in Cyber Space: Rethinking Optimal Evasion Attacks in the Age of AI-NIDS [70.60975663021952]
  We study blackbox adversarial attacks on network classifiers. We argue that attacker-defender fixed points are themselves general-sum games with complex phase transitions. We show that a continual learning approach is required to study attacker-defender dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T23:42:16Z)
• The Feasibility and Inevitability of Stealth Attacks [63.14766152741211]
  We study new adversarial perturbations that enable an attacker to gain control over decisions in generic Artificial Intelligence systems. In contrast to adversarial data modification, the attack mechanism we consider here involves alterations to the AI system itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-26T10:50:07Z)
• An Empirical Review of Adversarial Defenses [0.913755431537592]
  Deep neural networks, which form the basis of such systems, are highly susceptible to a specific type of attack, called adversarial attacks. A hacker can, even with bare minimum computation, generate adversarial examples (images or data points that belong to another class, but consistently fool the model to get misclassified as genuine) and crumble the basis of such algorithms. We show two effective techniques, namely Dropout and Denoising Autoencoders, and show their success in preventing such attacks from fooling the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T09:34:41Z)
• Attack Agnostic Adversarial Defense via Visual Imperceptible Bound [70.72413095698961]
  This research aims to design a defense model that is robust within a certain bound against both seen and unseen adversarial attacks. The proposed defense model is evaluated on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Tiny ImageNet databases. The proposed algorithm is attack agnostic, i.e. it does not require any knowledge of the attack algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-25T23:14:26Z)
• Adversarial Deep Ensemble: Evasion Attacks and Defenses for Malware Detection [8.551227913472632]
  We propose a new attack approach, named mixture of attacks, to perturb a malware example without ruining its malicious functionality. This naturally leads to a new instantiation of adversarial training, which is further geared to enhancing the ensemble of deep neural networks. We evaluate defenses using Android malware detectors against 26 different attacks upon two practical datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-30T05:56:33Z)
• Arms Race in Adversarial Malware Detection: A Survey [33.8941961394801]
  Malicious software (malware) is a major cyber threat that has to be tackled with Machine Learning (ML) techniques. ML is vulnerable to attacks known as adversarial examples. Knowing the defender's feature set is critical to the success of transfer attacks. The effectiveness of adversarial training depends on the defender's capability in identifying the most powerful attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-24T07:20:42Z)
• Deflecting Adversarial Attacks [94.85315681223702]
  We present a new approach towards ending this cycle where we "deflect" adversarial attacks by causing the attacker to produce an input that resembles the attack's target class. We first propose a stronger defense based on Capsule Networks that combines three detection mechanisms to achieve state-of-the-art detection performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T06:59:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.