A Systematic Media Frame Analysis of 1.5 Million New York Times Articles
from 2000 to 2017
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.01803v1
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 19:25:39 GMT
- Title: A Systematic Media Frame Analysis of 1.5 Million New York Times Articles
from 2000 to 2017
- Authors: Haewoon Kwak and Jisun An and Yong-Yeol Ahn
- Abstract summary: We develop a media frame classifier to analyze the media frames of 1.5 million New York Times articles published from 2000 to 2017.
We show that short-term frame abundance closely corresponds to major events, while there also exist several long-term trends.
As a case study, we delve into the framing of mass shootings, revealing three major framing patterns.
- Score: 9.304337244850773
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Framing is an indispensable narrative device for news media because even the
same facts may lead to conflicting understandings if deliberate framing is
employed. Therefore, identifying media framing is a crucial step to
understanding how news media influence the public. Framing is, however,
difficult to operationalize and detect, and thus traditional media framing
studies had to rely on manual annotation, which is challenging to scale up to
massive news datasets. Here, by developing a media frame classifier that
achieves state-of-the-art performance, we systematically analyze the media
frames of 1.5 million New York Times articles published from 2000 to 2017. By
examining the ebb and flow of media frames over almost two decades, we show
that short-term frame abundance fluctuation closely corresponds to major
events, while there also exist several long-term trends, such as the gradually
increasing prevalence of the ``Cultural identity'' frame. By examining specific
topics and sentiments, we identify characteristics and dynamics of each frame.
Finally, as a case study, we delve into the framing of mass shootings,
revealing three major framing patterns. Our scalable, computational approach to
massive news datasets opens up new pathways for systematic media framing
studies.
Related papers
- Detecting Frames in News Headlines and Lead Images in U.S. Gun Violence Coverage [12.484533062130453]
We study the value of combining lead images and contextual information with text to identify the frame of a news article.
We release the first multimodal news framing dataset related to gun violence in the U.S.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T01:56:47Z) - Framing Analysis of Health-Related Narratives: Conspiracy versus
Mainstream Media [3.3181276611945263]
We investigate how the framing of health-related topics, such as COVID-19 and other diseases, differs between conspiracy and mainstream websites.
We find that health-related narratives in conspiracy media are predominantly framed in terms of beliefs, while mainstream media tend to present them in terms of science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-18T14:56:23Z) - Towards Corpus-Scale Discovery of Selection Biases in News Coverage:
Comparing What Sources Say About Entities as a Start [65.28355014154549]
This paper investigates the challenges of building scalable NLP systems for discovering patterns of media selection biases directly from news content in massive-scale news corpora.
We show the capabilities of the framework through a case study on NELA-2020, a corpus of 1.8M news articles in English from 519 news sources worldwide.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T23:36:45Z) - Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S.
News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022.
We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs.
Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z) - Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles [55.92100606666497]
We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection.
Overall the Right media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles.
We identify three major topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-16T05:56:58Z) - Beyond Discrete Genres: Mapping News Items onto a Multidimensional
Framework of Genre Cues [0.0]
We propose a non-discrete framework for mapping news items in terms of genre cues.
To automatically analyze a large amount of news items, we deliver two computational models for predicting news sentences.
This proposed approach helps in deepening our insight into the evolving nature of news genres.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T10:54:31Z) - GREENER: Graph Neural Networks for News Media Profiling [24.675574340841163]
We study the problem of profiling news media on the Web with respect to their factuality of reporting and bias.
Our main focus is on modeling the similarity between media outlets based on the overlap of their audience.
Prediction accuracy is found to improve by 2.5-27 macro-F1 points for the two tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-10T12:46:29Z) - Framing Unpacked: A Semi-Supervised Interpretable Multi-View Model of
Media Frames [32.06056273913706]
We develop a novel semi-supervised model for understanding how news media frame political issues.
The model learns to embed local information about the events and related actors in a news article through an auto-encoding framework.
Our experiments show that our model outperforms previous models of frame prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-22T13:05:53Z) - Cross-Media Keyphrase Prediction: A Unified Framework with
Multi-Modality Multi-Head Attention and Image Wordings [63.79979145520512]
We explore the joint effects of texts and images in predicting the keyphrases for a multimedia post.
We propose a novel Multi-Modality Multi-Head Attention (M3H-Att) to capture the intricate cross-media interactions.
Our model significantly outperforms the previous state of the art based on traditional attention networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-03T08:44:18Z) - Content-based Analysis of the Cultural Differences between TikTok and
Douyin [95.32409577885645]
Short-form video social media shifts away from the traditional media paradigm by telling the audience a dynamic story to attract their attention.
In particular, different combinations of everyday objects can be employed to represent a unique scene that is both interesting and understandable.
Offered by the same company, TikTok and Douyin are popular examples of such new media that has become popular in recent years.
The hypothesis that they express cultural differences together with media fashion and social idiosyncrasy is the primary target of our research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-03T01:47:49Z) - Cross-media Structured Common Space for Multimedia Event Extraction [82.36301617438268]
We introduce a new task, MultiMedia Event Extraction (M2E2), which aims to extract events and their arguments from multimedia documents.
We propose a novel method, Weakly Aligned Structured Embedding (WASE), that encodes structured representations of semantic information into a common embedding space.
By utilizing images, we extract 21.4% more event mentions than traditional text-only methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-05T20:21:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.