Framing Analysis of Health-Related Narratives: Conspiracy versus Mainstream Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10030v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:56:23 GMT
• Title: Framing Analysis of Health-Related Narratives: Conspiracy versus Mainstream Media
• Authors: Markus Reiter-Haas, Beate Kl\"osch, Markus Hadler, Elisabeth Lex
• Abstract summary: We investigate how the framing of health-related topics, such as COVID-19 and other diseases, differs between conspiracy and mainstream websites. We find that health-related narratives in conspiracy media are predominantly framed in terms of beliefs, while mainstream media tend to present them in terms of science.
• Score: 3.3181276611945263
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Understanding how online media frame issues is crucial due to their impact on public opinion. Research on framing using natural language processing techniques mainly focuses on specific content features in messages and neglects their narrative elements. Also, the distinction between framing in different sources remains an understudied problem. We address those issues and investigate how the framing of health-related topics, such as COVID-19 and other diseases, differs between conspiracy and mainstream websites. We incorporate narrative information into the framing analysis by introducing a novel frame extraction approach based on semantic graphs. We find that health-related narratives in conspiracy media are predominantly framed in terms of beliefs, while mainstream media tend to present them in terms of science. We hope our work offers new ways for a more nuanced frame analysis.

Related papers

• Detecting Frames in News Headlines and Lead Images in U.S. Gun Violence Coverage [12.484533062130453]
  We study the value of combining lead images and contextual information with text to identify the frame of a news article. We release the first multimodal news framing dataset related to gun violence in the U.S.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T01:56:47Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Towards Corpus-Scale Discovery of Selection Biases in News Coverage: Comparing What Sources Say About Entities as a Start [65.28355014154549]
  This paper investigates the challenges of building scalable NLP systems for discovering patterns of media selection biases directly from news content in massive-scale news corpora. We show the capabilities of the framework through a case study on NELA-2020, a corpus of 1.8M news articles in English from 519 news sources worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T23:36:45Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Open-Domain, Content-based, Multi-modal Fact-checking of Out-of-Context Images via Online Resources [70.68526820807402]
  A real image is re-purposed to support other narratives by misrepresenting its context and/or elements. Our goal is an inspectable method that automates this time-consuming and reasoning-intensive process by fact-checking the image-context pairing. Our work offers the first step and benchmark for open-domain, content-based, multi-modal fact-checking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T19:36:20Z)
• A Survey on Multimodal Disinformation Detection [33.89798158570927]
  We explore the state-of-the-art on multimodal disinformation detection covering various combinations of modalities. We argue for the need to tackle disinformation detection by taking into account multiple modalities as well as both factuality and harmfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-13T18:04:17Z)
• Moral Framing and Ideological Bias of News [2.72905758998493]
  We capture the frames based on the Moral Foundation Theory. We propose an unsupervised method that extracts the framing Bias and the framing Intensity. We validate the performance on an annotated twitter dataset and then use it to quantify the framing bias and partisanship of news.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-27T23:36:14Z)
• A Systematic Media Frame Analysis of 1.5 Million New York Times Articles from 2000 to 2017 [9.304337244850773]
  We develop a media frame classifier to analyze the media frames of 1.5 million New York Times articles published from 2000 to 2017. We show that short-term frame abundance closely corresponds to major events, while there also exist several long-term trends. As a case study, we delve into the framing of mass shootings, revealing three major framing patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T19:25:39Z)
• Survey on Visual Sentiment Analysis [87.20223213370004]
  This paper reviews pertinent publications and tries to present an exhaustive overview of the field of Visual Sentiment Analysis. The paper also describes principles of design of general Visual Sentiment Analysis systems from three main points of view. A formalization of the problem is discussed, considering different levels of granularity, as well as the components that can affect the sentiment toward an image in different ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-24T10:15:22Z)
• CO.ME.T.A. -- covid-19 media textual analysis. A dashboard for media monitoring [0.0]
  The dashboard allows to explore the mining of contents extracted and study the lexical structure that links the main discussion topics. Results obtained on a subset of documents show not only a health-related semantic dimension, but it also extends to social-economic dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-16T16:24:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.