A Formal Critique of the Value of the Colombian P\'aramo

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02810v1
• Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 11:49:16 GMT
• Title: A Formal Critique of the Value of the Colombian P\'aramo
• Abstract summary: This article presents conceptual and methodological frameworks to prioritise interventions on the Colombian P'aramo. We contend that the valuation of ecosystem services and the ecosystem services framework fail to examine value-based categories. We set out to formalise a (computational) dialogical scenario where arguments stating distinct, and often contradictory, actions delineate possible forms of appropriating the P'aramo.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This article presents conceptual and methodological frameworks to prioritise interventions on the Colombian P\'aramo. The mode of analysis that our work takes up is that of questioning value and related categories as definite empirically perceived phenomena. We contend that the valuation of ecosystem services -- even in its post-normal forms -- and the ecosystem services framework not only fail to examine value-based categories, but reproduce the problematic aspects of value-based social relations, which ultimately bear on the ecological issues affecting the P\'aramo. Upon this premise we set out to formalise a (computational) dialogical scenario where arguments stating distinct, and often contradictory, actions delineate possible forms of appropriating the P\'aramo, while motivating the examination of their defining sociality.

Related papers

• To Compare, or Not to Compare: On Methodological Practices in Evaluating Social Bias [61.40435736418359]
  We introduce a unified framework that standardizes heterogeneous benchmarks to contrast isolated demographic assessments with forced-choice comparative settings.<n>We show that comparative settings act as aggressive catalysts for latent discrimination, a shift primarily driven by underspecified contexts.<n>Finally, we demonstrate that this comparative prejudice is a generalized phenomenon that scales positively with model size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T13:53:50Z)
• Interactive Evaluation Requires a Design Science [90.62695599188204]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as systems that act over time through tools, environments, users, and other agents.<n>The field has begun to build interactive benchmarks, but the resulting landscape is fragmented.<n>This position paper argues that interactive evaluation should be treated as a principled evaluation paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T04:03:18Z)
• Learning the Value of Value Learning [0.0]
  We extend the Jeffrey-Bolker framework to model refinements in values and prove a value-of-information theorem for axiological refinement.<n>In multi-agent settings, we establish that mutual refinement will characteristically transform zero-sum games into positive-sum interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T19:06:30Z)
• Gini-based Model Monitoring: A General Framework with an Application to Non-life Insurance Pricing [0.0]
  This study is the first to systematically examine concept drift in non-life insurance pricing.<n>We (i) provide an overview of the relevant literature and commonly used methodologies, clarify the distinction between virtual drift and concept drift, and explain their implications for long-run model performance.<n>We illustrate the framework using a modified real-world portfolio with induced concept drift and discuss practical considerations and pitfalls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T07:41:09Z)
• LLM-based Evaluation Policy Extraction for Ecological Modeling [22.432508855430797]
  evaluating ecological time series is critical for benchmarking model performance in many important applications.<n>Traditional numerical metrics fail to capture domain-specific temporal patterns critical to ecological processes.<n>We propose a novel framework that integrates metric learning with large language model (LLM)-based natural language policy extraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T01:02:29Z)
• Pitfalls of topology-aware image segmentation [81.19923502845441]
  We identify critical pitfalls in model evaluation that include inadequate connectivity choices, overlooked topological artifacts, and inappropriate use of evaluation metrics. We propose a set of actionable recommendations to establish fair and robust evaluation standards for topology-aware medical image segmentation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T08:11:42Z)
• The Foundations of Tokenization: Statistical and Computational Concerns [51.370165245628975]
  Tokenization is a critical step in the NLP pipeline. Despite its recognized importance as a standard representation method in NLP, the theoretical underpinnings of tokenization are not yet fully understood. The present paper contributes to addressing this theoretical gap by proposing a unified formal framework for representing and analyzing tokenizer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T11:12:28Z)
• A Backdoor-based Explainable AI Benchmark for High Fidelity Evaluation of Attributions [60.06461883533697]
  We first identify a set of fidelity criteria that reliable benchmarks for attribution methods are expected to fulfill.<n>We then introduce a Backdoor-based eXplainable AI benchmark (BackX) that adheres to the desired fidelity criteria.<n>Our analysis also offers insights into defending against neural Trojans by utilizing the attributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T13:48:37Z)
• Evaluating Span Extraction in Generative Paradigm: A Reflection on Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis [7.373480417322289]
  This paper addresses the emerging challenges introduced by the generative paradigm. We highlight the intricacies involved in aligning generative outputs with other evaluative metrics. Our contribution lies in paving the path for a comprehensive guideline tailored for ABSA evaluations in this generative paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T16:33:22Z)
• Predictive Performance Comparison of Decision Policies Under Confounding [32.21041697921289]
  We propose a method to compare the predictive performance of decision policies under a variety of modern identification approaches. Key to our method is the insight that there are regions of uncertainty that we can safely ignore in the policy comparison.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T01:27:07Z)
• Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Society [43.32010533676472]
  Generative AI systems across modalities, ranging from text (including code), image, audio, and video, have broad social impacts. There is no official standard for means of evaluating those impacts or for which impacts should be evaluated. We present a guide that moves toward a standard approach in evaluating a base generative AI system for any modality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T15:05:13Z)
• Reconciling Predictive and Statistical Parity: A Causal Approach [68.59381759875734]
  We propose a new causal decomposition formula for the fairness measures associated with predictive parity. We show that the notions of statistical and predictive parity are not really mutually exclusive, but complementary and spanning a spectrum of fairness notions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T09:23:22Z)
• Hallucinated Adversarial Control for Conservative Offline Policy Evaluation [64.94009515033984]
  We study the problem of conservative off-policy evaluation (COPE) where given an offline dataset of environment interactions, we seek to obtain a (tight) lower bound on a policy's performance. We introduce HAMBO, which builds on an uncertainty-aware learned model of the transition dynamics. We prove that the resulting COPE estimates are valid lower bounds, and, under regularity conditions, show their convergence to the true expected return.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T08:57:35Z)
• Evaluation Gaps in Machine Learning Practice [13.963766987258161]
  In practice, evaluations of machine learning models frequently focus on a narrow range of decontextualized predictive behaviours. We examine the evaluation gaps between the idealized breadth of evaluation concerns and the observed narrow focus of actual evaluations. By studying these properties, we demonstrate the machine learning discipline's implicit assumption of a range of commitments which have normative impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-11T04:00:44Z)
• Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systems [76.79703106646967]
  We develop a value-based assessment framework that visualizes closeness and tensions between values. We give guidelines on how to operationalize them, while opening up the evaluation and deliberation process to a wide range of stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-09T19:28:32Z)
• Promises and Challenges of Causality for Ethical Machine Learning [2.1946447418179664]
  We lay out the conditions for appropriate application of causal fairness under the "potential outcomes framework" We highlight key aspects of causal inference that are often ignored in the causal fairness literature. We argue that such conceptualization of the intervention is key in evaluating the validity of causal assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T00:04:10Z)
• Stateful Offline Contextual Policy Evaluation and Learning [88.9134799076718]
  We study off-policy evaluation and learning from sequential data. We formalize the relevant causal structure of problems such as dynamic personalized pricing. We show improved out-of-sample policy performance in this class of relevant problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T16:15:56Z)
• Energy-Based Learning for Cooperative Games, with Applications to Feature/Data/Model Valuations [91.36803653600667]
  We present a novel energy-based treatment for cooperative games, with a theoretical justification by the maximum entropy framework. Surprisingly, by conducting variational inference of the energy-based model, we recover various game-theoretic valuation criteria, such as Shapley value and Banzhaf index. We experimentally demonstrate that the proposed Variational Index enjoys intriguing properties on certain synthetic and real-world valuation problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T17:39:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.