What does the operator algebra of quantum statistics tell us about the objective causes of observable effects?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.03822v2
• Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 01:45:48 GMT
• Title: What does the operator algebra of quantum statistics tell us about the objective causes of observable effects?
• Authors: Holger F. Hofmann
• Abstract summary: I explore how the operator formalism accommodates the vast number of possible states and measurements. The necessity of non-positive elements is demonstrated by the uniquely defined mathematical description of ideal correlations. The validity of the operator algebra indicates that a consistent explanation of the various uncertainty limited phenomena associated with physical objects is only possible if we learn to accept the fact that the elements of causality cannot be reconciled with a continuation of observable reality in the physical object.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Quantum physics can only make statistical predictions about possible measurement outcomes, and these predictions originate from an operator algebra that is fundamentally different from the conventional definition of probability as a subjective lack of information regarding the physical reality of the system. In the present paper, I explore how the operator formalism accommodates the vast number of possible states and measurements by characterizing its essential function as a description of causality relations between initial conditions and subsequent observations. It is shown that any complete description of causality must involve non-positive statistical elements that cannot be associated with any directly observable effects. The necessity of non-positive elements is demonstrated by the uniquely defined mathematical description of ideal correlations which explains the physics of maximally entangled states, quantum teleportation and quantum cloning. The operator formalism thus modifies the concept of causality by providing a universally valid description of deterministic relations between initial states and subsequent observations that cannot be expressed in terms of directly observable measurement outcomes. Instead, the identifiable elements of causality are necessarily non-positive and hence unobservable. The validity of the operator algebra therefore indicates that a consistent explanation of the various uncertainty limited phenomena associated with physical objects is only possible if we learn to accept the fact that the elements of causality cannot be reconciled with a continuation of observable reality in the physical object.

Related papers

• Quantum determinism and completeness restored by indistinguishability and long-time particle detection [0.0]
  We argue that measurement data in quantum physics can be rigorously interpreted only as a result of a statistical, macroscopic process. We show with the illustrative cases of the Schr"odinger cat and the Bell experiment that once the Born rule is abandoned on the level of a single particle, realism, locality and causality are restored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-22T18:15:24Z)
• Testing trajectory-based determinism via time probability distributions [44.99833362998488]
  Bohmian mechanics (BM) has inherited more predictive power than quantum mechanics (QM) We introduce a prescription for constructing a flight-time probability distribution within generic trajectory-equipped theories. We derive probability distributions that are unreachable by QM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T11:36:38Z)
• Born's rule from epistemic assumptions [0.0]
  Born's rule is the recipe for calculating probabilities from quantum mechanical amplitudes. There is no generally accepted derivation of Born's rule from first principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T23:03:37Z)
• Measurement incompatibility is strictly stronger than disturbance [44.99833362998488]
  Heisenberg argued that measurements irreversibly alter the state of the system on which they are acting, causing an irreducible disturbance on subsequent measurements. This article shows that measurement incompatibility is indeed a sufficient condition for irreversibility of measurement disturbance. However, we exhibit a toy theory, termed the minimal classical theory (MCT), that is a counterexample for the converse implication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T13:47:00Z)
• On a foundational conceptual principle of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  Anton Zeilinger's "foundational conceptual principle" for quantum mechanics is an idealistic principle, which should be replaced by a realistic principle of contextuality. We argue that the assumption of non-locality is not required to explain quantum correlation. In contrast to Zeilinger's proposed principle of quantization of information, the principle of contextuality explains it realistically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-26T11:24:14Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Self-adjointness in Quantum Mechanics: a pedagogical path [77.34726150561087]
  This paper aims to make quantum observables emerge as necessarily self-adjoint, and not merely hermitian operators. Next to the central core of our line of reasoning, the necessity of a non-trivial declaration of a domain to associate with the formal action of an observable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T21:19:33Z)
• Probability, Preclusion and Biological Evolution in Heisenberg-Picture Everett Quantum Mechanics [0.07614628596146598]
  Hard preclusion can provide an explanation for biological evolution. It can also explain our subjective experiences of, and reactions to, "ordinary" probabilistic phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T18:51:04Z)
• Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
  We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations. We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z)
• Quantum causality relations and the emergence of reality from coherent superpositions [0.0]
  I investigate the relation between the classical notion of reality and quantum superpositions. It is shown that classical reality emerges at the macroscopic level. It is possible to demonstrate that the classical notion of objective reality emerges only at the macroscopic level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-31T00:24:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.