Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12423v2
• Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 19:15:03 GMT
• Title: Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis
• Authors: Bing He, Caleb Ziems, Sandeep Soni, Naren Ramakrishnan, Diyi Yang, Srijan Kumar
• Abstract summary: COVID-19 has sparked racism and hate on social media targeted towards Asian communities. We study the evolution and spread of anti-Asian hate speech through the lens of Twitter. We create COVID-HATE, the largest dataset of anti-Asian hate and counterspeech spanning 14 months.
• Score: 51.39895377836919
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The spread of COVID-19 has sparked racism and hate on social media targeted towards Asian communities. However, little is known about how racial hate spreads during a pandemic and the role of counterspeech in mitigating this spread. In this work, we study the evolution and spread of anti-Asian hate speech through the lens of Twitter. We create COVID-HATE, the largest dataset of anti-Asian hate and counterspeech spanning 14 months, containing over 206 million tweets, and a social network with over 127 million nodes. By creating a novel hand-labeled dataset of 3,355 tweets, we train a text classifier to identify hate and counterspeech tweets that achieves an average macro-F1 score of 0.832. Using this dataset, we conduct longitudinal analysis of tweets and users. Analysis of the social network reveals that hateful and counterspeech users interact and engage extensively with one another, instead of living in isolated polarized communities. We find that nodes were highly likely to become hateful after being exposed to hateful content. Notably, counterspeech messages may discourage users from turning hateful, potentially suggesting a solution to curb hate on web and social media platforms. Data and code is at http://claws.cc.gatech.edu/covid.

Related papers

• ProvocationProbe: Instigating Hate Speech Dataset from Twitter [0.39052860539161904]
  textitProvocationProbe is a dataset designed to explore what distinguishes instigating hate speech from general hate speech. For this study, we collected around twenty thousand tweets from Twitter, encompassing a total of nine global controversies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T16:57:59Z)
• Overview of the HASOC Subtrack at FIRE 2023: Identification of Tokens Contributing to Explicit Hate in English by Span Detection [40.10513344092731]
  Reactively, using black-box models to identify hateful content can perplex users as to why their posts were automatically flagged as hateful. proactive mitigation can be achieved by suggesting rephrasing before a post is made public.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T12:01:19Z)
• Analyzing User Characteristics of Hate Speech Spreaders on Social Media [20.57872238271025]
  We analyze the role of user characteristics in hate speech resharing across different types of hate speech. We find that users with little social influence tend to share more hate speech. Political anti-Trump and anti-right-wing hate is reshared by users with larger social influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T12:17:48Z)
• CoSyn: Detecting Implicit Hate Speech in Online Conversations Using a Context Synergized Hyperbolic Network [52.85130555886915]
  CoSyn is a context-synergized neural network that explicitly incorporates user- and conversational context for detecting implicit hate speech in online conversations. We show that CoSyn outperforms all our baselines in detecting implicit hate speech with absolute improvements in the range of 1.24% - 57.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:30:43Z)
• Quantifying How Hateful Communities Radicalize Online Users [2.378428291297535]
  We measure the impact of joining fringe hateful communities in terms of hate speech propagated to the rest of the social network. We use data from Reddit to assess the effect of joining one type of echo chamber: a digital community of like-minded users exhibiting hateful behavior. We show that the harmful speech does not remain contained within the community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-19T01:13:29Z)
• Predicting Hate Intensity of Twitter Conversation Threads [26.190359413890537]
  We propose DRAGNET++, which aims to predict the intensity of hatred that a tweet can bring in through its reply chain in the future. It uses the semantic and propagating structure of the tweet threads to maximize the contextual information leading up to and the fall of hate intensity at each subsequent tweet. We show that DRAGNET++ outperforms all the state-of-the-art baselines significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T18:51:36Z)
• Leveraging Transformers for Hate Speech Detection in Conversational Code-Mixed Tweets [36.29939722039909]
  This paper describes the system proposed by team MIDAS-IIITD for HASOC 2021 subtask 2. It is one of the first shared tasks focusing on detecting hate speech from Hindi-English code-mixed conversations on Twitter. Our best performing system, a hard voting ensemble of Indic-BERT, XLM-RoBERTa, and Multilingual BERT, achieved a macro F1 score of 0.7253.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-18T19:27:33Z)
• "Stop Asian Hate!" : Refining Detection of Anti-Asian Hate Speech During the COVID-19 Pandemic [2.5227595609842206]
  COVID-19 pandemic has fueled a surge in anti-Asian xenophobia and prejudice. We create and annotate a corpus of Twitter tweets using 2 experimental approaches to explore anti-Asian abusive and hate speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-04T06:55:19Z)
• Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection [75.54119209776894]
  We investigate the effect of annotator identities (who) and beliefs (why) on toxic language annotations. We consider posts with three characteristics: anti-Black language, African American English dialect, and vulgarity. Our results show strong associations between annotator identity and beliefs and their ratings of toxicity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T18:58:20Z)
• Understanding the Hoarding Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic using Large Scale Social Media Data [77.34726150561087]
  We analyze the hoarding and anti-hoarding patterns of over 42,000 unique Twitter users in the United States from March 1 to April 30, 2020. We find the percentage of females in both hoarding and anti-hoarding groups is higher than that of the general Twitter user population. The LIWC anxiety mean for the hoarding-related tweets is significantly higher than the baseline Twitter anxiety mean.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:02:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.