Predicting and Analyzing Law-Making in Kenya
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.05493v1
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:21:50 GMT
- Title: Predicting and Analyzing Law-Making in Kenya
- Authors: Oyinlola Babafemi and Adewale Akinfaderin
- Abstract summary: We developed and trained machine learning models on a combination of features extracted from the bills to predict the outcome.
We observed that the texts in a bill are not as relevant as the year and month the bill was introduced and the category the bill belongs to.
- Score: 0.012691047660244334
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Modelling and analyzing parliamentary legislation, roll-call votes and order
of proceedings in developed countries has received significant attention in
recent years. In this paper, we focused on understanding the bills introduced
in a developing democracy, the Kenyan bicameral parliament. We developed and
trained machine learning models on a combination of features extracted from the
bills to predict the outcome - if a bill will be enacted or not. We observed
that the texts in a bill are not as relevant as the year and month the bill was
introduced and the category the bill belongs to.
Related papers
- Framework of Voting Prediction of Parliament Members [9.050557698554694]
Voting Prediction Framework (VPF) is a data-driven framework designed to forecast parliamentary voting outcomes at the individual legislator level and for entire bills.<n>VPF consists of three key components: Data Collection, Parsing and Feature Integration, and Prediction Models.<n>To evaluate VPF, we analyzed over 5 million voting records from five countries - Canada, Israel, Tunisia, the United Kingdom and the USA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-18T20:26:55Z) - Algorithm for Automatic Legislative Text Consolidation [0.0]
We present a generative approach that processes legislative texts to automatically apply amendments.
Our method employs light quantized generative model, fine-tuned with LoRA, to generate accurate and reliable amended texts.
A full automated pipeline of legislative text consolidation can be done in a few hours, with a success rate of more than 63% on a difficult bill.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-28T08:52:33Z) - Physics in Next-token Prediction [46.953251684423165]
We identified the law of information conservation within Next-token Prediction (NTP)
We proposed the First Law of Information Capacity (IC-1), demonstrating that the essence of intelligence emergence in auto-regressive models is a process of information transfer.
We also introduced Landauer's Principle into NTP, formulating the Second Law of Information Capacity (IC-2), which establishes the relationship between auto-regressive model training and energy consumption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-01T15:26:15Z) - The Knesset Corpus: An Annotated Corpus of Hebrew Parliamentary Proceedings [3.2405928866433067]
We present the Corpus Knesset, a corpus of Hebrew parliamentary proceedings from 1998 to 2022.
We show that the corpus can be used to examine historical developments in the style of political discussions.
We also investigate some differences between the styles of men and women speakers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T12:23:39Z) - Exploiting Contrastive Learning and Numerical Evidence for Confusing
Legal Judgment Prediction [46.71918729837462]
Given the fact description text of a legal case, legal judgment prediction aims to predict the case's charge, law article and penalty term.
Previous studies fail to distinguish different classification errors with a standard cross-entropy classification loss.
We propose a moco-based supervised contrastive learning to learn distinguishable representations.
We further enhance the representation of the fact description with extracted crime amounts which are encoded by a pre-trained numeracy model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-15T15:53:56Z) - DeepParliament: A Legal domain Benchmark & Dataset for Parliament Bills
Prediction [0.0]
This paper introduces DeepParliament, a legal domain Benchmark dataset that gathers bill documents and metadata.
We propose two new benchmarks: Binary and Multi-Class Bill Status classification.
This work will be the first to present a Parliament bill prediction task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-15T04:55:32Z) - Do Charge Prediction Models Learn Legal Theory? [59.74220430434435]
We argue that trustworthy charge prediction models should take legal theories into consideration.
We propose three principles for trustworthy models should follow in this task, which are sensitive, selective, and presumption of innocence.
Our findings indicate that, while existing charge prediction models meet the selective principle on a benchmark dataset, most of them are still not sensitive enough and do not satisfy the presumption of innocence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-31T07:32:12Z) - Entity Graph Extraction from Legal Acts -- a Prototype for a Use Case in
Policy Design Analysis [52.77024349608834]
This paper presents a prototype developed to serve the quantitative study of public policy design.
Our system aims to automate the process of gathering legal documents, annotating them with Institutional Grammar, and using hypergraphs to analyse inter-relations between crucial entities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-02T10:57:47Z) - DEBACER: a method for slicing moderated debates [55.705662163385966]
Partitioning debates into blocks with the same subject is essential for understanding.
We propose a new algorithm, DEBACER, which partitions moderated debates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-10T10:39:07Z) - Feature Engineering for US State Legislative Hearings: Stance,
Affiliation, Engagement and Absentees [0.8122270502556374]
We propose a system to automatically track the affiliation of organizations in public comments.
A metric to compute legislator engagement and absenteeism is also proposed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T06:50:35Z) - Learning Bill Similarity with Annotated and Augmented Corpora of Bills [9.910141281434319]
We construct a human-labeled dataset of 4,721 bill-to-bill relationships at the subsection-level.
We generate synthetic data with varying degrees of similarity, mimicking the complex bill writing process.
We apply our trained model to infer section- and bill-level similarities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-14T08:50:06Z) - Lawformer: A Pre-trained Language Model for Chinese Legal Long Documents [56.40163943394202]
We release the Longformer-based pre-trained language model, named as Lawformer, for Chinese legal long documents understanding.
We evaluate Lawformer on a variety of LegalAI tasks, including judgment prediction, similar case retrieval, legal reading comprehension, and legal question answering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-09T09:39:25Z) - Which bills are lobbied? Predicting and interpreting lobbying activity
in the US [0.0]
We use lobbying data from OpenSecrets.org to predict if a piece of legislation (US bill) has been subjected to lobbying activities or not.
We also investigate the influence of the intensity of the lobbying activity on how discernible a lobbied bill is from one that was not subject to lobbying.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-29T10:46:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.