Related papers: Entity Graph Extraction from Legal Acts -- a Prototype for a Use Case in Policy Design Analysis

Entity Graph Extraction from Legal Acts -- a Prototype for a Use Case in Policy Design Analysis

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.00944v1
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 10:57:47 GMT
Title: Entity Graph Extraction from Legal Acts -- a Prototype for a Use Case in Policy Design Analysis
Authors: Anna Wr\'oblewska, Bartosz Pieli\'nski, Karolina Seweryn, Karol Saputa, Aleksandra Wichrowska, Sylwia Sysko-Roma\'nczuk, Hanna Schreiber
Abstract summary: This paper presents a prototype developed to serve the quantitative study of public policy design. Our system aims to automate the process of gathering legal documents, annotating them with Institutional Grammar, and using hypergraphs to analyse inter-relations between crucial entities.
Score: 52.77024349608834
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: This paper presents research on a prototype developed to serve the quantitative study of public policy design. This sub-discipline of political science focuses on identifying actors, relations between them, and tools at their disposal in health, environmental, economic, and other policies. Our system aims to automate the process of gathering legal documents, annotating them with Institutional Grammar, and using hypergraphs to analyse inter-relations between crucial entities. Our system is tested against the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage from 2003, a legal document regulating essential aspects of international relations securing cultural heritage.

Related papers

An evidence-based methodology for human rights impact assessment (HRIA) in the development of AI data-intensive systems [49.1574468325115]
We show that human rights already underpin the decisions in the field of data use. This work presents a methodology and a model for a Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA) The proposed methodology is tested in concrete case-studies to prove its feasibility and effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-30T16:27:52Z)
Topic Modelling Case Law Using a Large Language Model and a New Taxonomy for UK Law: AI Insights into Summary Judgment [0.0]
This paper develops and applies a novel taxonomy for topic modelling summary judgment cases in the United Kingdom. Using a curated dataset of summary judgment cases, we use the Large Language Model Claude 3 Opus to explore functional topics and trends. We find that Claude 3 Opus correctly classified the topic with an accuracy of 87.10%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T16:30:25Z)
Report of the 1st Workshop on Generative AI and Law [78.62063815165968]
This report presents the takeaways of the inaugural Workshop on Generative AI and Law (GenLaw) A cross-disciplinary group of practitioners and scholars from computer science and law convened to discuss the technical, doctrinal, and policy challenges presented by law for Generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-11T04:13:37Z)
Deep Dive into the Language of International Relations: NLP-based Analysis of UNESCO's Summary Records [0.0]
The inscription process on the UNESCO World Heritage List and the UNESCO Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity often leads to tensions and conflicts among states. We propose innovative topic modelling and tension detection methods based on UNESCO's summary records. We have developed an application tailored for diplomats, lawyers, political scientists, and international relations researchers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-31T11:06:08Z)
Automating the Analysis of Institutional Design in International Agreements [52.77024349608834]
The developed tool utilizes techniques such as collecting legal documents, annotating them with Institutional Grammar, and using graph analysis to explore the formal institutional design. The system was tested against the 2003 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T08:57:11Z)
Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Review [52.359007622096684]
Peer review is a key component of the publishing process in most fields of science. Existing NLP studies focus on the analysis of individual texts. editorial assistance often requires modeling interactions between pairs of texts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-22T16:39:38Z)
MAIR: Framework for mining relationships between research articles, strategies, and regulations in the field of explainable artificial intelligence [2.280298858971133]
It is essential to understand the dynamics of the impact of regulation on research papers and AI-related policies. This paper introduces a novel framework for joint analysis of AI-related policy documents and XAI research papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-29T20:41:17Z)
Measuring Law Over Time: A Network Analytical Framework with an Application to Statutes and Regulations in the United States and Germany [2.446672595462589]
We present a comprehensive framework for analyzing legal documents as multi-dimensional, dynamic document networks. We demonstrate the utility of this framework by applying it to an original dataset of statutes and regulations from two different countries. We find that at the federal level, the United States legal system is increasingly dominated by regulations, whereas the German legal system remains governed by statutes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-27T09:38:56Z)
Explaining Relationships Between Scientific Documents [55.23390424044378]
We address the task of explaining relationships between two scientific documents using natural language text. In this paper we establish a dataset of 622K examples from 154K documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-02T03:54:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.