Self-Supervised Relational Reasoning for Representation Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.05849v3
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:22:45 GMT
- Title: Self-Supervised Relational Reasoning for Representation Learning
- Authors: Massimiliano Patacchiola and Amos Storkey
- Abstract summary: In self-supervised learning, a system is tasked with achieving a surrogate objective by defining alternative targets on unlabeled data.
We propose a novel self-supervised formulation of relational reasoning that allows a learner to bootstrap a signal from information implicit in unlabeled data.
We evaluate the proposed method following a rigorous experimental procedure, using standard datasets, protocols, and backbones.
- Score: 5.076419064097733
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In self-supervised learning, a system is tasked with achieving a surrogate
objective by defining alternative targets on a set of unlabeled data. The aim
is to build useful representations that can be used in downstream tasks,
without costly manual annotation. In this work, we propose a novel
self-supervised formulation of relational reasoning that allows a learner to
bootstrap a signal from information implicit in unlabeled data. Training a
relation head to discriminate how entities relate to themselves
(intra-reasoning) and other entities (inter-reasoning), results in rich and
descriptive representations in the underlying neural network backbone, which
can be used in downstream tasks such as classification and image retrieval. We
evaluate the proposed method following a rigorous experimental procedure, using
standard datasets, protocols, and backbones. Self-supervised relational
reasoning outperforms the best competitor in all conditions by an average 14%
in accuracy, and the most recent state-of-the-art model by 3%. We link the
effectiveness of the method to the maximization of a Bernoulli log-likelihood,
which can be considered as a proxy for maximizing the mutual information,
resulting in a more efficient objective with respect to the commonly used
contrastive losses.
Related papers
- XAL: EXplainable Active Learning Makes Classifiers Better Low-resource Learners [71.8257151788923]
We propose a novel Explainable Active Learning framework (XAL) for low-resource text classification.
XAL encourages classifiers to justify their inferences and delve into unlabeled data for which they cannot provide reasonable explanations.
Experiments on six datasets show that XAL achieves consistent improvement over 9 strong baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T08:07:04Z) - Canary in a Coalmine: Better Membership Inference with Ensembled
Adversarial Queries [53.222218035435006]
We use adversarial tools to optimize for queries that are discriminative and diverse.
Our improvements achieve significantly more accurate membership inference than existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-19T17:46:50Z) - Uncertainty in Contrastive Learning: On the Predictability of Downstream
Performance [7.411571833582691]
We study whether the uncertainty of such a representation can be quantified for a single datapoint in a meaningful way.
We show that this goal can be achieved by directly estimating the distribution of the training data in the embedding space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-19T15:44:59Z) - Self-Taught Metric Learning without Labels [47.832107446521626]
We present a novel self-taught framework for unsupervised metric learning.
It alternates between predicting class-equivalence relations between data through a moving average of an embedding model and learning the model with the predicted relations as pseudo labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-04T05:48:40Z) - Masked prediction tasks: a parameter identifiability view [49.533046139235466]
We focus on the widely used self-supervised learning method of predicting masked tokens.
We show that there is a rich landscape of possibilities, out of which some prediction tasks yield identifiability, while others do not.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-18T17:09:32Z) - Learning Bias-Invariant Representation by Cross-Sample Mutual
Information Minimization [77.8735802150511]
We propose a cross-sample adversarial debiasing (CSAD) method to remove the bias information misused by the target task.
The correlation measurement plays a critical role in adversarial debiasing and is conducted by a cross-sample neural mutual information estimator.
We conduct thorough experiments on publicly available datasets to validate the advantages of the proposed method over state-of-the-art approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-11T21:17:02Z) - Hybrid Generative-Contrastive Representation Learning [32.84066504783469]
We show that a transformer-based encoder-decoder architecture trained with both contrastive and generative losses can learn highly discriminative and robust representations without hurting the generative performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-11T04:23:48Z) - S^3-Rec: Self-Supervised Learning for Sequential Recommendation with
Mutual Information Maximization [104.87483578308526]
We propose the model S3-Rec, which stands for Self-Supervised learning for Sequential Recommendation.
For our task, we devise four auxiliary self-supervised objectives to learn the correlations among attribute, item, subsequence, and sequence.
Extensive experiments conducted on six real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method over existing state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-18T11:44:10Z) - Adversarial Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning [62.17538130778111]
Existing adversarial learning approaches mostly use class labels to generate adversarial samples that lead to incorrect predictions.
We propose a novel adversarial attack for unlabeled data, which makes the model confuse the instance-level identities of the perturbed data samples.
We present a self-supervised contrastive learning framework to adversarially train a robust neural network without labeled data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-13T08:24:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.