Montreal AI Ethics Institute's Response to Scotland's AI Strategy
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.06300v1
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:08:17 GMT
- Title: Montreal AI Ethics Institute's Response to Scotland's AI Strategy
- Authors: Abhishek Gupta (Montreal AI Ethics Institute and Microsoft)
- Abstract summary: In January and February 2020, the Scottish Government released two documents for review by the public regarding their artificial intelligence (AI) strategy.
The Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) reviewed these documents and published a response on 4 June 2020.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In January and February 2020, the Scottish Government released two documents
for review by the public regarding their artificial intelligence (AI) strategy.
The Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) reviewed these documents and published
a response on 4 June 2020. MAIEI's response examines several questions that
touch on the proposed definition of AI; the people-centered nature of the
strategy; considerations to ensure that everyone benefits from AI; the
strategy's overarching vision; Scotland's AI ecosystem; the proposed strategic
themes; and how to grow public confidence in AI by building responsible and
ethical systems.
In addition to examining the points above, MAIEI suggests that the strategy
be extended to include considerations on biometric data and how that will be
processed and used in the context of AI. It also highlights the importance of
tackling head-on the inherently stochastic nature of deep learning systems and
developing concrete guidelines to ensure that these systems are built
responsibly and ethically, particularly as machine learning becomes more
accessible. Finally, it concludes that any national AI strategy must clearly
address the measurements of success in regards to the strategy's stated goals
and vision to ensure that they are interpreted and applied consistently. To do
this, there must be inclusion and transparency between those building the
systems and those using them in their work.
Related papers
- Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks.
We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering.
In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
Particip-AI is a framework to gather current and future AI use cases and their harms and benefits from non-expert public.
We gather responses from 295 demographically diverse participants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - Towards a Privacy and Security-Aware Framework for Ethical AI: Guiding
the Development and Assessment of AI Systems [0.0]
This study conducts a systematic literature review spanning the years 2020 to 2023.
Through the synthesis of knowledge extracted from the SLR, this study presents a conceptual framework tailored for privacy- and security-aware AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-13T15:39:57Z) - Responsible Artificial Intelligence: A Structured Literature Review [0.0]
The EU has recently issued several publications emphasizing the necessity of trust in AI.
This highlights the urgent need for international regulation.
This paper introduces a comprehensive and, to our knowledge, the first unified definition of responsible AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T17:01:13Z) - POLARIS: A framework to guide the development of Trustworthy AI systems [3.02243271391691]
There is a significant gap between high-level AI ethics principles and low-level concrete practices for AI professionals.
We develop a novel holistic framework for Trustworthy AI - designed to bridge the gap between theory and practice.
Our goal is to empower AI professionals to confidently navigate the ethical dimensions of Trustworthy AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T01:05:16Z) - Ten Hard Problems in Artificial Intelligence We Must Get Right [72.99597122935903]
We explore the AI2050 "hard problems" that block the promise of AI and cause AI risks.
For each problem, we outline the area, identify significant recent work, and suggest ways forward.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T23:16:41Z) - Trust, Accountability, and Autonomy in Knowledge Graph-based AI for
Self-determination [1.4305544869388402]
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) have emerged as fundamental platforms for powering intelligent decision-making.
The integration of KGs with neuronal learning is currently a topic of active research.
This paper conceptualises the foundational topics and research pillars to support KG-based AI for self-determination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T12:51:52Z) - Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humans through Public Policy [0.0]
This essay outlines research on AI that learn structures in policy data that can be leveraged for downstream tasks.
We believe this represents the "comprehension" phase of AI and policy, but leveraging policy as a key source of human values to align AI requires "understanding" policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-25T21:31:14Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations.
It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.