Equilibrium of Blockchain Miners with Dynamic Asset Allocation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08016v2
• Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 04:06:36 GMT
• Title: Equilibrium of Blockchain Miners with Dynamic Asset Allocation
• Authors: Go Yamamoto, Aron Laszka, Fuhito Kojima
• Abstract summary: We model and analyze blockchain miners who seek to maximize the compound return of their mining businesses. The cost of mining determines the share of each miner or mining pool at equilibrium. We conclude that neither miners nor mining pools who seek to maximize their compound return will have a financial incentive to occupy more than 50% of the hash rate.
• Score: 4.030037871304249
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We model and analyze blockchain miners who seek to maximize the compound return of their mining businesses. The analysis of the optimal strategies finds a new equilibrium point among the miners and the mining pools, which predicts the market share of each miner or mining pool. The cost of mining determines the share of each miner or mining pool at equilibrium. We conclude that neither miners nor mining pools who seek to maximize their compound return will have a financial incentive to occupy more than 50% of the hash rate if the cost of mining is at the same level for all. However, if there is an outstandingly cost-efficient miner, then the market share of this miner may exceed 50% in the equilibrium, which can threaten the viability of the entire ecosystem.

Related papers

• Bitcoin Under Volatile Block Rewards: How Mempool Statistics Can Influence Bitcoin Mining [5.893888881448058]
  As Bitcoin experiences more halving events, the protocol reward converges to zero, making transaction fees the primary source of miner rewards. Previous security analyses of Bitcoin have either considered a fixed block reward model or a highly simplified volatile model. We present a reinforcement learning-based tool designed to analyze mining strategies under a more realistic volatile model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T16:29:20Z)
• Model-based Analysis of Mining Fairness in a Blockchain [2.9281463284266973]
  Mining fairness in blockchain refers to the equality between the computational resources invested in mining and the block rewards received. We propose a method to calculate mining fairness using a simple mathematical model. We validated that our method accurately computes mining fairness in networks with a small number of miners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T02:27:28Z)
• Cryptocurrency Portfolio Optimization by Neural Networks [81.20955733184398]
  This paper proposes an effective algorithm based on neural networks to take advantage of these investment products. A deep neural network, which outputs the allocation weight of each asset at a time interval, is trained to maximize the Sharpe ratio. A novel loss term is proposed to regulate the network's bias towards a specific asset, thus enforcing the network to learn an allocation strategy that is close to a minimum variance strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T12:33:28Z)
• Smoothening block rewards: How much should miners pay for mining pools? [11.245119287096419]
  We quantify the economic advantage for a given miner of having smooth rewards. We use this to define a maximum percentage of rewards that a miner should be willing to pay for the mining pool services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T14:59:01Z)
• Partial Selfish Mining for More Profits [21.636578888742477]
  Mining attacks aim to gain an unfair share of extra rewards in the blockchain mining. In this paper, we propose a new and feasible Partial Selfish Mining (PSM) attack. We show that PSM attackers can be more profitable than selfish miners under a certain range of mining power and network conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-27T11:58:38Z)
• A Collaboration Strategy in the Mining Pool for Proof-of-Neural-Architecture Consensus [16.372941299296652]
  In most popular public accessible cryptocurrency systems, the mining pool plays a key role because mining cryptocurrency with the mining pool turns the non-profitable situation into profitable for individual miners. In many recent novel blockchain consensuses, the deep learning training procedure becomes the task for miners to prove their workload. While the incentive of miners is to earn tokens, individual miners are motivated to join mining pools to become more competitive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T17:08:02Z)
• The MineRL 2020 Competition on Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning using Human Priors [62.9301667732188]
  We propose a second iteration of the MineRL Competition. The primary goal of the competition is to foster the development of algorithms which can efficiently leverage human demonstrations. The competition is structured into two rounds in which competitors are provided several paired versions of the dataset and environment. At the end of each round, competitors submit containerized versions of their learning algorithms to the AIcrowd platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-26T20:32:30Z)
• Blockchain Assisted Decentralized Federated Learning (BLADE-FL): Performance Analysis and Resource Allocation [119.19061102064497]
  We propose a decentralized FL framework by integrating blockchain into FL, namely, blockchain assisted decentralized federated learning (BLADE-FL) In a round of the proposed BLADE-FL, each client broadcasts its trained model to other clients, competes to generate a block based on the received models, and then aggregates the models from the generated block before its local training of the next round. We explore the impact of lazy clients on the learning performance of BLADE-FL, and characterize the relationship among the optimal K, the learning parameters, and the proportion of lazy clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T07:19:08Z)
• Blockchain Assisted Decentralized Federated Learning (BLADE-FL) with Lazy Clients [124.48732110742623]
  We propose a novel framework by integrating blockchain into Federated Learning (FL) BLADE-FL has a good performance in terms of privacy preservation, tamper resistance, and effective cooperation of learning. It gives rise to a new problem of training deficiency, caused by lazy clients who plagiarize others' trained models and add artificial noises to conceal their cheating behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-02T12:18:27Z)
• Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [66.94149388181343]
  We present a new version of a popular $Q$-learning algorithm for MARL. We show that it can recover the optimal policy even with access to $Q*$. We also demonstrate improved performance on predator-prey and challenging multi-agent StarCraft benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T18:34:50Z)
• Resource Management for Blockchain-enabled Federated Learning: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach [54.29213445674221]
  Federated Learning (BFL) enables mobile devices to collaboratively train neural network models required by a Machine Learning Model Owner (MLMO) The issue of BFL is that the mobile devices have energy and CPU constraints that may reduce the system lifetime and training efficiency. We propose to use the Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to derive the optimal decisions for theO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-08T16:29:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.