Overparameterization and generalization error: weighted trigonometric interpolation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08495v3
• Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 19:39:24 GMT
• Title: Overparameterization and generalization error: weighted trigonometric interpolation
• Authors: Yuege Xie, Hung-Hsu Chou, Holger Rauhut, Rachel Ward
• Abstract summary: We study a random Fourier series model, where the task is to estimate the unknown Fourier coefficients from equidistant samples. We show precisely how a bias towards smooth interpolants, in the form of weighted trigonometric generalization, can lead to smaller generalization error.
• Score: 4.631723879329972
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Motivated by surprisingly good generalization properties of learned deep neural networks in overparameterized scenarios and by the related double descent phenomenon, this paper analyzes the relation between smoothness and low generalization error in an overparameterized linear learning problem. We study a random Fourier series model, where the task is to estimate the unknown Fourier coefficients from equidistant samples. We derive exact expressions for the generalization error of both plain and weighted least squares estimators. We show precisely how a bias towards smooth interpolants, in the form of weighted trigonometric interpolation, can lead to smaller generalization error in the overparameterized regime compared to the underparameterized regime. This provides insight into the power of overparameterization, which is common in modern machine learning.

Related papers

• Error Feedback under $(L_0,L_1)$-Smoothness: Normalization and Momentum [56.37522020675243]
  We provide the first proof of convergence for normalized error feedback algorithms across a wide range of machine learning problems. We show that due to their larger allowable stepsizes, our new normalized error feedback algorithms outperform their non-normalized counterparts on various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T10:19:27Z)
• Generalization for Least Squares Regression With Simple Spiked Covariances [3.9134031118910264]
  The generalization properties of even two-layer neural networks trained by gradient descent remain poorly understood. Recent work has made progress by describing the spectrum of the feature matrix at the hidden layer. Yet, the generalization error for linear models with spiked covariances has not been previously determined.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T19:46:51Z)
• Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regression [72.59731158970894]
  This paper presents a succinct derivation of the training and generalization performance of a variety of high-dimensional ridge regression models. We provide an introduction and review of recent results on these topics, aimed at readers with backgrounds in physics and deep learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T15:59:00Z)
• A U-turn on Double Descent: Rethinking Parameter Counting in Statistical Learning [68.76846801719095]
  We show that double descent appears exactly when and where it occurs, and that its location is not inherently tied to the threshold p=n. This provides a resolution to tensions between double descent and statistical intuition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T12:05:39Z)
• The Inductive Bias of Flatness Regularization for Deep Matrix Factorization [58.851514333119255]
  This work takes the first step toward understanding the inductive bias of the minimum trace of the Hessian solutions in deep linear networks. We show that for all depth greater than one, with the standard Isometry Property (RIP) on the measurements, minimizing the trace of Hessian is approximately equivalent to minimizing the Schatten 1-norm of the corresponding end-to-end matrix parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T23:14:57Z)
• Instance-Dependent Generalization Bounds via Optimal Transport [51.71650746285469]
  Existing generalization bounds fail to explain crucial factors that drive the generalization of modern neural networks. We derive instance-dependent generalization bounds that depend on the local Lipschitz regularity of the learned prediction function in the data space. We empirically analyze our generalization bounds for neural networks, showing that the bound values are meaningful and capture the effect of popular regularization methods during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T16:39:42Z)
• Fluctuations, Bias, Variance & Ensemble of Learners: Exact Asymptotics for Convex Losses in High-Dimension [25.711297863946193]
  We develop a theory for the study of fluctuations in an ensemble of generalised linear models trained on different, but correlated, features. We provide a complete description of the joint distribution of the empirical risk minimiser for generic convex loss and regularisation in the high-dimensional limit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T17:44:58Z)
• Post-mortem on a deep learning contest: a Simpson's paradox and the complementary roles of scale metrics versus shape metrics [61.49826776409194]
  We analyze a corpus of models made publicly-available for a contest to predict the generalization accuracy of neural network (NN) models. We identify what amounts to a Simpson's paradox: where "scale" metrics perform well overall but perform poorly on sub partitions of the data. We present two novel shape metrics, one data-independent, and the other data-dependent, which can predict trends in the test accuracy of a series of NNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T19:19:49Z)
• Understanding Double Descent Requires a Fine-Grained Bias-Variance Decomposition [34.235007566913396]
  We describe an interpretable, symmetric decomposition of the variance into terms associated with the labels. We find that the bias decreases monotonically with the network width, but the variance terms exhibit non-monotonic behavior. We also analyze the strikingly rich phenomenology that arises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T21:04:02Z)
• Memorizing without overfitting: Bias, variance, and interpolation in over-parameterized models [0.0]
  The bias-variance trade-off is a central concept in supervised learning. Modern Deep Learning methods flout this dogma, achieving state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T22:31:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.