(Non)-neutrality of science and algorithms: Machine Learning between fundamental physics and society

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10745v1
• Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 09:43:28 GMT
• Title: (Non)-neutrality of science and algorithms: Machine Learning between fundamental physics and society
• Authors: Aniello Lampo, Michele Mancarella and Angelo Piga
• Abstract summary: We will deal with different aspects of the issue, from a bibliometric analysis of the publications to a detailed discussion of the literature. The analysis will be conducted on the basis of three key elements: the non-neutrality of science, understood as its intrinsic relationship with history and society. The deconstruction of the presumed universality of scientific thought from the inside becomes in this perspective a necessary first step also for any social and political discussion.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The impact of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms in the age of big data and platform capitalism has not spared scientific research in academia. In this work, we will analyse the use of ML in fundamental physics and its relationship to other cases that directly affect society. We will deal with different aspects of the issue, from a bibliometric analysis of the publications, to a detailed discussion of the literature, to an overview on the productive and working context inside and outside academia. The analysis will be conducted on the basis of three key elements: the non-neutrality of science, understood as its intrinsic relationship with history and society; the non-neutrality of the algorithms, in the sense of the presence of elements that depend on the choices of the programmer, which cannot be eliminated whatever the technological progress is; the problematic nature of a paradigm shift in favour of a data-driven science (and society). The deconstruction of the presumed universality of scientific thought from the inside becomes in this perspective a necessary first step also for any social and political discussion. This is the subject of this work in the case study of ML.

Related papers

• Implicit Personalization in Language Models: A Systematic Study [94.29756463158853]
  Implicit Personalization (IP) is a phenomenon of language models inferring a user's background from the implicit cues in the input prompts. This work systematically studies IP through a rigorous mathematical formulation, a multi-perspective moral reasoning framework, and a set of case studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T17:18:46Z)
• Data Science for Social Good [2.8621556092850065]
  We present a framework for "data science for social good" (DSSG) research. We perform an analysis of the literature to empirically demonstrate the paucity of work on DSSG in information systems. We hope that this article and the special issue will spur future DSSG research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T15:40:20Z)
• Beyond case studies: Teaching data science critique and ethics through sociotechnical surveillance studies [0.0]
  Ethics have become an urgent concern for data science research, practice, and instruction in the wake of growing critique of algorithms and systems showing that they reinforce structural oppression. We designed a data science ethics course that spoke to the social phenomena at the root of critical data studies through analysis of a pressing sociotechnical system: surveillance systems. Students developed critical analysis skills that allowed them to investigate surveillance systems of their own and identify their benefits, harms, main proponents, those who resist them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T20:24:42Z)
• Coordinated Science Laboratory 70th Anniversary Symposium: The Future of Computing [80.72844751804166]
  In 2021, the Coordinated Science Laboratory CSL hosted the Future of Computing Symposium to celebrate its 70th anniversary. We summarize the major technological points, insights, and directions that speakers brought forward during the symposium. Participants discussed topics related to new computing paradigms, technologies, algorithms, behaviors, and research challenges to be expected in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T17:32:27Z)
• Aggression and "hate speech" in communication of media users: analysis of control capabilities [50.591267188664666]
  Authors studied the possibilities of mutual influence of users in new media. They found a high level of aggression and hate speech when discussing an urgent social problem - measures for COVID-19 fighting. Results can be useful for developing media content in a modern digital environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T15:53:32Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• Automating Ambiguity: Challenges and Pitfalls of Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  This thesis weaves together seemingly disparate fields of enquiry to examine core scientific and ethical challenges, pitfalls, and problems of AI. The various challenges, problems and pitfalls of these systems are a hot topic of research in various areas, such as critical data/algorithm studies, science and technology studies (STS), embodied and enactive cognitive science, complexity science, Afro-feminism, and the broadly construed emerging field of Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T22:05:07Z)
• Human-Robot Collaboration and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review of Recent Research [69.48907856390834]
  Human-robot collaboration (HRC) is the approach that explores the interaction between a human and a robot. This paper proposes a thorough literature review of the use of machine learning techniques in the context of HRC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T15:14:33Z)
• Scientia Potentia Est -- On the Role of Knowledge in Computational Argumentation [52.903665881174845]
  We propose a pyramid of types of knowledge required in computational argumentation. We briefly discuss the state of the art on the role and integration of these types in the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T08:12:41Z)
• Do Abstractions Have Politics? Toward a More Critical Algorithm Analysis [19.08810272234958]
  We argue for affordance analysis, a more critical algorithm analysis based on an affordance account of value embedding. We illustrate 5 case studies of how affordance analysis refutes social determination of technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-04T05:59:26Z)
• No computation without representation: Avoiding data and algorithm biases through diversity [11.12971845021808]
  We draw connections between the lack of diversity within academic and professional computing fields and the type and breadth of the biases encountered in datasets. We use these lessons to develop recommendations that provide concrete steps for the computing community to increase diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T23:07:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.