Mitigating Bias in Online Microfinance Platforms: A Case Study on Kiva.org

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12995v1
• Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 00:22:49 GMT
• Title: Mitigating Bias in Online Microfinance Platforms: A Case Study on Kiva.org
• Authors: Soumajyoti Sarkar, Hamidreza Alvari
• Abstract summary: We investigate lender perceptions of economic factors of the borrower countries in relation to their preferences towards loans associated with different sectors. We find that the influence from economic factors and loan attributes can have substantially different roles to play for different sectors in achieving faster funding.
• Score: 0.348097307252416
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Over the last couple of decades in the lending industry, financial disintermediation has occurred on a global scale. Traditionally, even for small supply of funds, banks would act as the conduit between the funds and the borrowers. It has now been possible to overcome some of the obstacles associated with such supply of funds with the advent of online platforms like Kiva, Prosper, LendingClub. Kiva for example, works with Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs) in developing countries to build Internet profiles of borrowers with a brief biography, loan requested, loan term, and purpose. Kiva, in particular, allows lenders to fund projects in different sectors through group or individual funding. Traditional research studies have investigated various factors behind lender preferences purely from the perspective of loan attributes and only until recently have some cross-country cultural preferences been investigated. In this paper, we investigate lender perceptions of economic factors of the borrower countries in relation to their preferences towards loans associated with different sectors. We find that the influence from economic factors and loan attributes can have substantially different roles to play for different sectors in achieving faster funding. We formally investigate and quantify the hidden biases prevalent in different loan sectors using recent tools from causal inference and regression models that rely on Bayesian variable selection methods. We then extend these models to incorporate fairness constraints based on our empirical analysis and find that such models can still achieve near comparable results with respect to baseline regression models.

Related papers

• FinTSB: A Comprehensive and Practical Benchmark for Financial Time Series Forecasting [58.70072722290475]
  Financial time series (FinTS) record the behavior of human-brain-augmented decision-making. FinTSB is a comprehensive and practical benchmark for financial time series forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T05:19:16Z)
• Escaping the Subprime Trap in Algorithmic Lending [49.1574468325115]
  We study the role of risk-management constraints, specifically Value-at-Risk (VaR) constraints, in the persistence of segregation in loan approval decisions. We develop a formal model in which a mainstream (low-interest) bank is more sensitive to variance risk than a subprime bank. We show that a small, finite subsidy can help minority groups escape the trap by covering enough of the mainstream bank's downside.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T03:43:57Z)
• STORM: A Spatio-Temporal Factor Model Based on Dual Vector Quantized Variational Autoencoders for Financial Trading [55.02735046724146]
  In financial trading, factor models are widely used to price assets and capture excess returns from mispricing. We propose a Spatio-Temporal factOR Model based on dual vector quantized variational autoencoders, named STORM. Storm extracts features of stocks from temporal and spatial perspectives, then fuses and aligns these features at the fine-grained and semantic level, and represents the factors as multi-dimensional embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T17:15:49Z)
• On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Models [93.67389739906561]
  We focus on open foundation models, defined here as those with broadly available model weights. We identify five distinctive properties of open foundation models that lead to both their benefits and risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T16:49:53Z)
• Empowering Many, Biasing a Few: Generalist Credit Scoring through Large Language Models [53.620827459684094]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have great potential for credit scoring tasks, with strong generalization ability across multiple tasks. We propose the first open-source comprehensive framework for exploring LLMs for credit scoring. We then propose the first Credit and Risk Assessment Large Language Model (CALM) by instruction tuning, tailored to the nuanced demands of various financial risk assessment tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T03:50:34Z)
• Multi-Target Multiplicity: Flexibility and Fairness in Target Specification under Resource Constraints [76.84999501420938]
  We introduce a conceptual and computational framework for assessing how the choice of target affects individuals' outcomes. We show that the level of multiplicity that stems from target variable choice can be greater than that stemming from nearly-optimal models of a single target.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T18:57:14Z)
• Inclusive FinTech Lending via Contrastive Learning and Domain Adaptation [9.75150920742607]
  FinTech lending has played a significant role in facilitating financial inclusion. There are concerns about the potentially biased algorithmic decision-making during loan screening. We propose a new Transformer-based sequential loan screening model with self-supervised contrastive learning and domain adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T01:11:35Z)
• Factor Investing with a Deep Multi-Factor Model [123.52358449455231]
  We develop a novel deep multi-factor model that adopts industry neutralization and market neutralization modules with clear financial insights. Tests on real-world stock market data demonstrate the effectiveness of our deep multi-factor model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T14:47:11Z)
• Machine Learning Models Evaluation and Feature Importance Analysis on NPL Dataset [0.0]
  We evaluate how different Machine learning models perform on the dataset provided by a private bank in Ethiopia. XGBoost achieves the highest F1 score on the KMeans SMOTE over-sampled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-28T17:09:44Z)
• Should Bank Stress Tests Be Fair? [1.370633147306388]
  We argue that simply pooling data across banks treats banks equally but is subject to two deficiencies. We argue for estimating and then discarding centered bank fixed effects as preferable to simply ignoring differences across banks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-27T06:46:51Z)
• Payday loans -- blessing or growth suppressor? Machine Learning Analysis [0.0]
  This research paper revolves around the impact of payday loans in the real estate market. The research paper draws a first-hand experience of obtaining the index for the concentration of real estate in an area of reference by virtue of payday loans in Toronto, Ontario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-30T14:04:58Z)
• Supporting Financial Inclusion with Graph Machine Learning and Super-App Alternative Data [63.942632088208505]
  Super-Apps have changed the way we think about the interactions between users and commerce. This paper investigates how different interactions between users within a Super-App provide a new source of information to predict borrower behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-19T15:13:06Z)
• Super-App Behavioral Patterns in Credit Risk Models: Financial, Statistical and Regulatory Implications [110.54266632357673]
  We present the impact of alternative data that originates from an app-based marketplace, in contrast to traditional bureau data, upon credit scoring models. Our results, validated across two countries, show that these new sources of data are particularly useful for predicting financial behavior in low-wealth and young individuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-09T01:32:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.