Better Early than Late: Fusing Topics with Word Embeddings for Neural
Question Paraphrase Identification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11314v1
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:09:26 GMT
- Title: Better Early than Late: Fusing Topics with Word Embeddings for Neural
Question Paraphrase Identification
- Authors: Nicole Peinelt, Dong Nguyen and Maria Liakata
- Abstract summary: We propose two ways of merging topics with word embeddings in a new neural architecture for question paraphrase identification.
Our results show that our system outperforms neural baselines on multiple CQA datasets.
- Score: 24.574227630018758
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Question paraphrase identification is a key task in Community Question
Answering (CQA) to determine if an incoming question has been previously asked.
Many current models use word embeddings to identify duplicate questions, but
the use of topic models in feature-engineered systems suggests that they can be
helpful for this task, too. We therefore propose two ways of merging topics
with word embeddings (early vs. late fusion) in a new neural architecture for
question paraphrase identification. Our results show that our system
outperforms neural baselines on multiple CQA datasets, while an ablation study
highlights the importance of topics and especially early topic-embedding fusion
in our architecture.
Related papers
- Qsnail: A Questionnaire Dataset for Sequential Question Generation [76.616068047362]
We present the first dataset specifically constructed for the questionnaire generation task, which comprises 13,168 human-written questionnaires.
We conduct experiments on Qsnail, and the results reveal that retrieval models and traditional generative models do not fully align with the given research topic and intents.
Despite enhancements through the chain-of-thought prompt and finetuning, questionnaires generated by language models still fall short of human-written questionnaires.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T04:14:10Z) - Improving Question Generation with Multi-level Content Planning [70.37285816596527]
This paper addresses the problem of generating questions from a given context and an answer, specifically focusing on questions that require multi-hop reasoning across an extended context.
We propose MultiFactor, a novel QG framework based on multi-level content planning. Specifically, MultiFactor includes two components: FA-model, which simultaneously selects key phrases and generates full answers, and Q-model which takes the generated full answer as an additional input to generate questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T13:57:01Z) - Weakly Supervised Visual Question Answer Generation [2.7605547688813172]
We present a weakly supervised method that synthetically generates question-answer pairs procedurally from visual information and captions.
We perform an exhaustive experimental analysis on VQA dataset and see that our model significantly outperforms SOTA methods on BLEU scores.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-11T08:46:42Z) - Modern Question Answering Datasets and Benchmarks: A Survey [5.026863544662493]
Question Answering (QA) is one of the most important natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
It aims using NLP technologies to generate a corresponding answer to a given question based on the massive unstructured corpus.
In this paper, we investigate influential QA datasets that have been released in the era of deep learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T05:53:56Z) - Enhancing Question Generation with Commonsense Knowledge [33.289599417096206]
We propose a multi-task learning framework to introduce commonsense knowledge into question generation process.
Experimental results on SQuAD show that our proposed methods are able to noticeably improve the QG performance on both automatic and human evaluation metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-19T08:58:13Z) - Attention-based model for predicting question relatedness on Stack
Overflow [0.0]
We propose an Attention-based Sentence pair Interaction Model (ASIM) to predict the relatedness between questions on Stack Overflow automatically.
ASIM has made significant improvement over the baseline approaches in Precision, Recall, and Micro-F1 evaluation metrics.
Our model also performs well in the duplicate question detection task of Ask Ubuntu.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-19T12:18:03Z) - Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text Comprehension [60.21497846332531]
We introduce INQUISITIVE, a dataset of 19K questions that are elicited while a person is reading through a document.
We show that readers engage in a series of pragmatic strategies to seek information.
We evaluate question generation models based on GPT-2 and show that our model is able to generate reasonable questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-04T19:03:39Z) - A Survey on Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Base: Recent
Advances and Challenges [71.4531144086568]
Question Answering (QA) over Knowledge Base (KB) aims to automatically answer natural language questions.
Researchers have shifted their attention from simple questions to complex questions, which require more KB triples and constraint inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-26T07:13:32Z) - ClarQ: A large-scale and diverse dataset for Clarification Question
Generation [67.1162903046619]
We devise a novel bootstrapping framework that assists in the creation of a diverse, large-scale dataset of clarification questions based on postcomments extracted from stackexchange.
We quantitatively demonstrate the utility of the newly created dataset by applying it to the downstream task of question-answering.
We release this dataset in order to foster research into the field of clarification question generation with the larger goal of enhancing dialog and question answering systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-10T17:56:50Z) - Knowledgeable Dialogue Reading Comprehension on Key Turns [84.1784903043884]
Multi-choice machine reading comprehension (MRC) requires models to choose the correct answer from candidate options given a passage and a question.
Our research focuses dialogue-based MRC, where the passages are multi-turn dialogues.
It suffers from two challenges, the answer selection decision is made without support of latently helpful commonsense, and the multi-turn context may hide considerable irrelevant information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-29T07:04:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.