Backtesting the predictability of COVID-19
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11411v1
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:18:00 GMT
- Title: Backtesting the predictability of COVID-19
- Authors: Dmitry Gordeev, Philipp Singer, Marios Michailidis, Mathias M\"uller,
SriSatish Ambati
- Abstract summary: We use historical data of COVID-19 infections from 253 regions from the period of 22nd January 2020 until 22nd June 2020.
Prediction errors are substantially higher in early stages of the pandemic, resulting from limited data.
The more confirmed cases a country exhibits at any point in time, the lower the error in forecasting future confirmed cases.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic has instigated unprecedented changes in
many countries around the globe, putting a significant burden on the health
sectors, affecting the macro economic conditions, and altering social
interactions amongst the population. In response, the academic community has
produced multiple forecasting models, approaches and algorithms to best predict
the different indicators of COVID-19, such as the number of confirmed infected
cases. Yet, researchers had little to no historical information about the
pandemic at their disposal in order to inform their forecasting methods. Our
work studies the predictive performance of models at various stages of the
pandemic to better understand their fundamental uncertainty and the impact of
data availability on such forecasts. We use historical data of COVID-19
infections from 253 regions from the period of 22nd January 2020 until 22nd
June 2020 to predict, through a rolling window backtesting framework, the
cumulative number of infected cases for the next 7 and 28 days. We implement
three simple models to track the root mean squared logarithmic error in this
6-month span, a baseline model that always predicts the last known value of the
cumulative confirmed cases, a power growth model and an epidemiological model
called SEIRD. Prediction errors are substantially higher in early stages of the
pandemic, resulting from limited data. Throughout the course of the pandemic,
errors regress slowly, but steadily. The more confirmed cases a country
exhibits at any point in time, the lower the error in forecasting future
confirmed cases. We emphasize the significance of having a rigorous backtesting
framework to accurately assess the predictive power of such models at any point
in time during the outbreak which in turn can be used to assign the right level
of certainty to these forecasts and facilitate better planning.
Related papers
- Using Pre-training and Interaction Modeling for ancestry-specific disease prediction in UK Biobank [69.90493129893112]
Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered the genetic basis of complex traits, but show an under-representation of non-European descent individuals.
Here, we assess whether we can improve disease prediction across diverse ancestries using multiomic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-26T16:39:50Z) - Performative Time-Series Forecasting [71.18553214204978]
We formalize performative time-series forecasting (PeTS) from a machine-learning perspective.
We propose a novel approach, Feature Performative-Shifting (FPS), which leverages the concept of delayed response to anticipate distribution shifts.
We conduct comprehensive experiments using multiple time-series models on COVID-19 and traffic forecasting tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T18:34:29Z) - Forecast reconciliation for vaccine supply chain optimization [61.13962963550403]
Vaccine supply chain optimization can benefit from hierarchical time series forecasting.
Forecasts of different hierarchy levels become incoherent when higher levels do not match the sum of the lower levels forecasts.
We tackle the vaccine sale forecasting problem by modeling sales data from GSK between 2010 and 2021 as a hierarchical time series.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-02T14:34:34Z) - Improving ECG-based COVID-19 diagnosis and mortality predictions using
pre-pandemic medical records at population-scale [19.23987229578229]
This study shows this approach -- pre-train deep learning models with pre-pandemic data -- can work effectively.
Similar transfer learning strategies can be useful for developing timely artificial intelligence solutions in future pandemic outbreaks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-14T04:48:07Z) - Predicting infections in the Covid-19 pandemic -- lessons learned [5.981641988736108]
In this paper, we start from prediction algorithms proposed for XPrize Pandemic Response Challenge and consider several directions that might allow their improvement.
We find that augmenting the algorithms with additional information about the culture of the modeled region can improve the performance for short term predictions.
The accuracy of medium-term predictions is still very low and a significant amount of future research is needed to make such models a reliable component of a public policy toolbox.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-02T20:20:46Z) - A spatiotemporal machine learning approach to forecasting COVID-19
incidence at the county level in the United States [2.9822184411723645]
We present COVID-LSTM, a data-driven model based on a Long Short-term memory architecture for forecasting COVID-19 incidence at the county-level in the US.
We use the weekly number of new cases as temporal input, and hand-engineered spatial features from Facebook to capture the spread of the disease in time and space.
Over the 4-week forecast horizon, our model is on average 50 cases per county more accurate than the COVIDhub-ensemble.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-24T17:40:08Z) - Back2Future: Leveraging Backfill Dynamics for Improving Real-time
Predictions in Future [73.03458424369657]
In real-time forecasting in public health, data collection is a non-trivial and demanding task.
'Backfill' phenomenon and its effect on model performance has been barely studied in the prior literature.
We formulate a novel problem and neural framework Back2Future that aims to refine a given model's predictions in real-time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-08T14:48:20Z) - When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for
Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions.
Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations.
We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z) - Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze and
Predict the Covid-19 Outbreak [10.307715136465056]
We present a comparative analysis of various machine learning (ML) approaches in predicting the COVID-19 outbreak in the epidemiological domain.
The results reveal the advantages of ML algorithms for supporting decision making of evolving short term policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-11T11:57:33Z) - STELAR: Spatio-temporal Tensor Factorization with Latent Epidemiological
Regularization [76.57716281104938]
We develop a tensor method to predict the evolution of epidemic trends for many regions simultaneously.
STELAR enables long-term prediction by incorporating latent temporal regularization through a system of discrete-time difference equations.
We conduct experiments using both county- and state-level COVID-19 data and show that our model can identify interesting latent patterns of the epidemic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-08T21:21:47Z) - Forecasting Brazilian and American COVID-19 cases based on artificial
intelligence coupled with climatic exogenous variables [3.0711362702464675]
coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a public health problem once according to the World Health Organization up to June 10th, 2020.
In the current scenario, the Brazil and the United States of America present a high daily incidence of new cases and deaths.
It is important to forecast the number of new cases in a time window of one week, once this can help the public health system developing strategic planning to deals with the COVID-19.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-21T17:58:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.