Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze and Predict the Covid-19 Outbreak

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.05960v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:57:33 GMT
• Title: Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze and Predict the Covid-19 Outbreak
• Authors: Muhammad Naeem, Jian Yu, Muhammad Aamir, Sajjad Ahmad Khan, Olayinka Adeleye, Zardad Khan
• Abstract summary: We present a comparative analysis of various machine learning (ML) approaches in predicting the COVID-19 outbreak in the epidemiological domain. The results reveal the advantages of ML algorithms for supporting decision making of evolving short term policies.
• Score: 10.307715136465056
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Background. Forecasting the time of forthcoming pandemic reduces the impact of diseases by taking precautionary steps such as public health messaging and raising the consciousness of doctors. With the continuous and rapid increase in the cumulative incidence of COVID-19, statistical and outbreak prediction models including various machine learning (ML) models are being used by the research community to track and predict the trend of the epidemic, and also in developing appropriate strategies to combat and manage its spread. Methods. In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of various ML approaches including Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbor and Artificial Neural Network in predicting the COVID-19 outbreak in the epidemiological domain. We first apply the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) method to identify and model the short and long-run relationships of the time-series COVID-19 datasets. That is, we determine the lags between a response variable and its respective explanatory time series variables as independent variables. Then, the resulting significant variables concerning their lags are used in the regression model selected by the ARDL for predicting and forecasting the trend of the epidemic. Results. Statistical measures i.e., Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) are used for model accuracy. The values of MAPE for the best selected models for confirmed, recovered and deaths cases are 0.407, 0.094 and 0.124 respectively, which falls under the category of highly accurate forecasts. In addition, we computed fifteen days ahead forecast for the daily deaths, recover, and confirm patients and the cases fluctuated across time in all aspects. Besides, the results reveal the advantages of ML algorithms for supporting decision making of evolving short term policies.

Related papers

• Deep State-Space Generative Model For Correlated Time-to-Event Predictions [54.3637600983898]
  We propose a deep latent state-space generative model to capture the interactions among different types of correlated clinical events. Our method also uncovers meaningful insights about the latent correlations among mortality and different types of organ failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-28T02:42:36Z)
• Modeling Epidemic Spread: A Gaussian Process Regression Approach [0.7374726900469741]
  We present a new data-driven method based on Gaussian process regression (GPR) to model epidemic spread. We present examples that use GPR to model and predict epidemic spread by using real-world infection data gathered in the UK during the COVID-19 epidemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T22:45:01Z)
• Neural parameter calibration and uncertainty quantification for epidemic forecasting [0.0]
  We apply a novel and powerful computational method to the problem of learning probability densities on contagion parameters. Using a neural network, we calibrate an ODE model to data of the spread of COVID-19 in Berlin in 2020. We show convergence of our method to the true posterior on a simplified SIR model of epidemics, and also demonstrate our method's learning capabilities on a reduced dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T21:34:59Z)
• Comparison of Traditional and Hybrid Time Series Models for Forecasting COVID-19 Cases [0.5849513679510832]
  The coronavirus outbreak of December 2019 has already infected millions all over the world and continues to spread on. Just when the curve of the outbreak had started to flatten, many countries have again started to witness a rise in cases. A thorough analysis of time-series forecasting models is therefore required to equip state authorities and health officials with immediate strategies for future times.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-05T14:56:27Z)
• Increasing the efficiency of randomized trial estimates via linear adjustment for a prognostic score [59.75318183140857]
  Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is central to clinical research. Most methods for historical borrowing achieve reductions in variance by sacrificing strict type-I error rate control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T21:10:10Z)
• STELAR: Spatio-temporal Tensor Factorization with Latent Epidemiological Regularization [76.57716281104938]
  We develop a tensor method to predict the evolution of epidemic trends for many regions simultaneously. STELAR enables long-term prediction by incorporating latent temporal regularization through a system of discrete-time difference equations. We conduct experiments using both county- and state-level COVID-19 data and show that our model can identify interesting latent patterns of the epidemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T21:21:47Z)
• An Optimal Control Approach to Learning in SIDARTHE Epidemic model [67.22168759751541]
  We propose a general approach for learning time-variant parameters of dynamic compartmental models from epidemic data. We forecast the epidemic evolution in Italy and France.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-28T10:58:59Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)
• Backtesting the predictability of COVID-19 [0.0]
  We use historical data of COVID-19 infections from 253 regions from the period of 22nd January 2020 until 22nd June 2020. Prediction errors are substantially higher in early stages of the pandemic, resulting from limited data. The more confirmed cases a country exhibits at any point in time, the lower the error in forecasting future confirmed cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-22T13:18:00Z)
• A self-supervised neural-analytic method to predict the evolution of COVID-19 in Romania [10.760851506126105]
  We use a recently published improved version of SEIR, which is the classic, established model for infectious diseases. We propose a self-supervised approach to train a deep convolutional network to guess the correct set of ModifiedSEIR model parameters. We find an optimistic result in the case fatality rate for Romania which may be around 0.3% and we also demonstrate that our model is able to correctly predict the number of daily fatalities for up to three weeks in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T12:00:04Z)
• A General Framework for Survival Analysis and Multi-State Modelling [70.31153478610229]
  We use neural ordinary differential equations as a flexible and general method for estimating multi-state survival models. We show that our model exhibits state-of-the-art performance on popular survival data sets and demonstrate its efficacy in a multi-state setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T19:24:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.