Deep Generative Models that Solve PDEs: Distributed Computing for Training Large Data-Free Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.12792v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 22:42:35 GMT
• Title: Deep Generative Models that Solve PDEs: Distributed Computing for Training Large Data-Free Models
• Authors: Sergio Botelho, Ameya Joshi, Biswajit Khara, Soumik Sarkar, Chinmay Hegde, Santi Adavani, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian
• Abstract summary: Recent progress in scientific machine learning (SciML) has opened up the possibility of training novel neural network architectures that solve complex partial differential equations (PDEs) Here we report on a software framework for data parallel distributed deep learning that resolves the twin challenges of training these large SciML models. Our framework provides several out of the box functionality including (a) loss integrity independent of number of processes, (b) synchronized batch normalization, and (c) distributed higher-order optimization methods.
• Score: 25.33147292369218
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent progress in scientific machine learning (SciML) has opened up the possibility of training novel neural network architectures that solve complex partial differential equations (PDEs). Several (nearly data free) approaches have been recently reported that successfully solve PDEs, with examples including deep feed forward networks, generative networks, and deep encoder-decoder networks. However, practical adoption of these approaches is limited by the difficulty in training these models, especially to make predictions at large output resolutions ($\geq 1024 \times 1024$). Here we report on a software framework for data parallel distributed deep learning that resolves the twin challenges of training these large SciML models - training in reasonable time as well as distributing the storage requirements. Our framework provides several out of the box functionality including (a) loss integrity independent of number of processes, (b) synchronized batch normalization, and (c) distributed higher-order optimization methods. We show excellent scalability of this framework on both cloud as well as HPC clusters, and report on the interplay between bandwidth, network topology and bare metal vs cloud. We deploy this approach to train generative models of sizes hitherto not possible, showing that neural PDE solvers can be viably trained for practical applications. We also demonstrate that distributed higher-order optimization methods are $2-3\times$ faster than stochastic gradient-based methods and provide minimal convergence drift with higher batch-size.

Related papers

• Partitioned Neural Network Training via Synthetic Intermediate Labels [0.0]
  GPU memory constraints have become a notable bottleneck in training such sizable models. This study advocates partitioning the model across GPU and generating synthetic intermediate labels to train individual segments. This approach results in a more efficient training process that minimizes data communication while maintaining model accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T13:06:29Z)
• ATOM: Asynchronous Training of Massive Models for Deep Learning in a Decentralized Environment [7.916080032572087]
  atom is a resilient distributed training framework designed for asynchronous training of vast models in a decentralized setting. atom aims to accommodate a complete LLM on one host (peer) through seamlessly model swapping and concurrently trains multiple copies across various peers to optimize training throughput. Our experiments using different GPT-3 model configurations reveal that, in scenarios with suboptimal network connections, atom can enhance training efficiency up to $20 times$ when juxtaposed with the state-of-the-art decentralized pipeline parallelism approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T17:43:43Z)
• Towards a Better Theoretical Understanding of Independent Subnetwork Training [56.24689348875711]
  We take a closer theoretical look at Independent Subnetwork Training (IST) IST is a recently proposed and highly effective technique for solving the aforementioned problems. We identify fundamental differences between IST and alternative approaches, such as distributed methods with compressed communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T18:14:22Z)
• Training Deep Surrogate Models with Large Scale Online Learning [48.7576911714538]
  Deep learning algorithms have emerged as a viable alternative for obtaining fast solutions for PDEs. Models are usually trained on synthetic data generated by solvers, stored on disk and read back for training. It proposes an open source online training framework for deep surrogate models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T12:02:27Z)
• SWARM Parallelism: Training Large Models Can Be Surprisingly Communication-Efficient [69.61083127540776]
  Deep learning applications benefit from using large models with billions of parameters. Training these models is notoriously expensive due to the need for specialized HPC clusters. We consider alternative setups for training large models: using cheap "preemptible" instances or pooling existing resources from multiple regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T18:55:19Z)
• Supernet Training for Federated Image Classification under System Heterogeneity [15.2292571922932]
  In this work, we propose a novel framework to consider both scenarios, namely Federation of Supernet Training (FedSup) It is inspired by how averaging parameters in the model aggregation stage of Federated Learning (FL) is similar to weight-sharing in supernet training. Under our framework, we present an efficient algorithm (E-FedSup) by sending the sub-model to clients in the broadcast stage for reducing communication costs and training overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-03T02:21:01Z)
• Closed-form Continuous-Depth Models [99.40335716948101]
  Continuous-depth neural models rely on advanced numerical differential equation solvers. We present a new family of models, termed Closed-form Continuous-depth (CfC) networks, that are simple to describe and at least one order of magnitude faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:08:51Z)
• Scaling Distributed Deep Learning Workloads beyond the Memory Capacity with KARMA [58.040931661693925]
  We propose a strategy that combines redundant recomputing and out-of-core methods. We achieve an average of 1.52x speedup in six different models over the state-of-the-art out-of-core methods. Our data parallel out-of-core solution can outperform complex hybrid model parallelism in training large models, e.g. Megatron-LM and Turning-NLG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-26T07:24:34Z)
• Model Fusion via Optimal Transport [64.13185244219353]
  We present a layer-wise model fusion algorithm for neural networks. We show that this can successfully yield "one-shot" knowledge transfer between neural networks trained on heterogeneous non-i.i.d. data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-10-12T22:07:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.