Modal Uncertainty Estimation via Discrete Latent Representation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.12858v1
• Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 05:29:34 GMT
• Title: Modal Uncertainty Estimation via Discrete Latent Representation
• Authors: Di Qiu, Lok Ming Lui
• Abstract summary: We introduce a deep learning framework that learns the one-to-many mappings between the inputs and outputs, together with faithful uncertainty measures. Our framework demonstrates significantly more accurate uncertainty estimation than the current state-of-the-art methods.
• Score: 4.246061945756033
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many important problems in the real world don't have unique solutions. It is thus important for machine learning models to be capable of proposing different plausible solutions with meaningful probability measures. In this work we introduce such a deep learning framework that learns the one-to-many mappings between the inputs and outputs, together with faithful uncertainty measures. We call our framework {\it modal uncertainty estimation} since we model the one-to-many mappings to be generated through a set of discrete latent variables, each representing a latent mode hypothesis that explains the corresponding type of input-output relationship. The discrete nature of the latent representations thus allows us to estimate for any input the conditional probability distribution of the outputs very effectively. Both the discrete latent space and its uncertainty estimation are jointly learned during training. We motivate our use of discrete latent space through the multi-modal posterior collapse problem in current conditional generative models, then develop the theoretical background, and extensively validate our method on both synthetic and realistic tasks. Our framework demonstrates significantly more accurate uncertainty estimation than the current state-of-the-art methods, and is informative and convenient for practical use.

Related papers

• Uncertainty Quantification via Hölder Divergence for Multi-View Representation Learning [18.419742575630217]
  This paper introduces a novel algorithm based on H"older Divergence (HD) to enhance the reliability of multi-view learning. Through the Dempster-Shafer theory, integration of uncertainty from different modalities, thereby generating a comprehensive result. Mathematically, HD proves to better measure the distance'' between real data distribution and predictive distribution of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T04:29:44Z)
• Missing Modality Prediction for Unpaired Multimodal Learning via Joint Embedding of Unimodal Models [6.610033827647869]
  In real-world scenarios, consistently acquiring complete multimodal data presents significant challenges. This often leads to the issue of missing modalities, where data for certain modalities are absent. We propose a novel framework integrating parameter-efficient fine-tuning of unimodal pretrained models with a self-supervised joint-embedding learning method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T14:44:25Z)
• It's All in the Mix: Wasserstein Machine Learning with Mixed Features [5.739657897440173]
  We present a practically efficient algorithm to solve mixed-feature problems. We demonstrate that our approach can significantly outperform existing methods that are to the presence of discrete features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T15:15:52Z)
• Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification for Cross-modal Retrieval [139.21955930418815]
  Cross-modal Retrieval methods build similarity relations between vision and language modalities by jointly learning a common representation space. However, the predictions are often unreliable due to the Aleatoric uncertainty, which is induced by low-quality data, e.g., corrupt images, fast-paced videos, and non-detailed texts. We propose a novel Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification (PAU) framework to provide trustworthy predictions by quantifying the uncertainty arisen from the inherent data ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T09:41:19Z)
• Measuring and Modeling Uncertainty Degree for Monocular Depth Estimation [50.920911532133154]
  The intrinsic ill-posedness and ordinal-sensitive nature of monocular depth estimation (MDE) models pose major challenges to the estimation of uncertainty degree. We propose to model the uncertainty of MDE models from the perspective of the inherent probability distributions. By simply introducing additional training regularization terms, our model, with surprisingly simple formations and without requiring extra modules or multiple inferences, can provide uncertainty estimations with state-of-the-art reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:11:15Z)
• Towards Characterizing Domain Counterfactuals For Invertible Latent Causal Models [15.817239008727789]
  In this work, we analyze a specific type of causal query called domain counterfactuals, which hypothesizes what a sample would have looked like if it had been generated in a different domain. We show that recovering the latent Structural Causal Model (SCM) is unnecessary for estimating domain counterfactuals. We also develop a theoretically grounded practical algorithm that simplifies the modeling process to generative model estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T04:19:06Z)
• Modeling Multimodal Aleatoric Uncertainty in Segmentation with Mixture of Stochastic Expert [24.216869988183092]
  We focus on capturing the data-inherent uncertainty (aka aleatoric uncertainty) in segmentation, typically when ambiguities exist in input images. We propose a novel mixture of experts (MoSE) model, where each expert network estimates a distinct mode of aleatoric uncertainty. We develop a Wasserstein-like loss that directly minimizes the distribution distance between the MoSE and ground truth annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T16:48:21Z)
• BayesIMP: Uncertainty Quantification for Causal Data Fusion [52.184885680729224]
  We study the causal data fusion problem, where datasets pertaining to multiple causal graphs are combined to estimate the average treatment effect of a target variable. We introduce a framework which combines ideas from probabilistic integration and kernel mean embeddings to represent interventional distributions in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T10:14:18Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data for Entity-Relation Extraction through Probabilistic Constraint Satisfaction [54.06292969184476]
  We study the problem of entity-relation extraction in the presence of symbolic domain knowledge. Our approach employs semantic loss which captures the precise meaning of a logical sentence. With a focus on low-data regimes, we show that semantic loss outperforms the baselines by a wide margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-20T00:16:29Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
• Learning while Respecting Privacy and Robustness to Distributional Uncertainties and Adversarial Data [66.78671826743884]
  The distributionally robust optimization framework is considered for training a parametric model. The objective is to endow the trained model with robustness against adversarially manipulated input data. Proposed algorithms offer robustness with little overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T18:25:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.