Chance Constrained Policy Optimization for Process Control and Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.00030v2
• Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:34:26 GMT
• Title: Chance Constrained Policy Optimization for Process Control and Optimization
• Authors: Panagiotis Petsagkourakis, Ilya Orson Sandoval, Eric Bradford, Federico Galvanin, Dongda Zhang and Ehecatl Antonio del Rio-Chanona
• Abstract summary: Chemical process optimization and control are affected by 1) plant-model mismatch, 2) process disturbances, and 3) constraints for safe operation. We propose a chance constrained policy optimization algorithm which guarantees the satisfaction of joint chance constraints with a high probability.
• Score: 1.4908563154226955
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Chemical process optimization and control are affected by 1) plant-model mismatch, 2) process disturbances, and 3) constraints for safe operation. Reinforcement learning by policy optimization would be a natural way to solve this due to its ability to address stochasticity, plant-model mismatch, and directly account for the effect of future uncertainty and its feedback in a proper closed-loop manner; all without the need of an inner optimization loop. One of the main reasons why reinforcement learning has not been considered for industrial processes (or almost any engineering application) is that it lacks a framework to deal with safety critical constraints. Present algorithms for policy optimization use difficult-to-tune penalty parameters, fail to reliably satisfy state constraints or present guarantees only in expectation. We propose a chance constrained policy optimization (CCPO) algorithm which guarantees the satisfaction of joint chance constraints with a high probability - which is crucial for safety critical tasks. This is achieved by the introduction of constraint tightening (backoffs), which are computed simultaneously with the feedback policy. Backoffs are adjusted with Bayesian optimization using the empirical cumulative distribution function of the probabilistic constraints, and are therefore self-tuned. This results in a general methodology that can be imbued into present policy optimization algorithms to enable them to satisfy joint chance constraints with high probability. We present case studies that analyze the performance of the proposed approach.

Related papers

• SCPO: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Safety Critic Policy Optimization [1.3597551064547502]
  This study introduces a novel safe reinforcement learning algorithm, Safety Critic Policy Optimization. In this study, we define the safety critic, a mechanism that nullifies rewards obtained through violating safety constraints. Our theoretical analysis indicates that the proposed algorithm can automatically balance the trade-off between adhering to safety constraints and maximizing rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T22:12:50Z)
• Probabilistic Reach-Avoid for Bayesian Neural Networks [71.67052234622781]
  We show that an optimal synthesis algorithm can provide more than a four-fold increase in the number of certifiable states. The algorithm is able to provide more than a three-fold increase in the average guaranteed reach-avoid probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T10:52:21Z)
• Constrained Proximal Policy Optimization [36.20839673950677]
  We propose a novel first-order feasible method named Constrained Proximal Policy Optimization (CPPO) Our approach integrates the Expectation-Maximization framework to solve it through two steps: 1) calculating the optimal policy distribution within the feasible region (E-step), and 2) conducting a first-order update to adjust the current policy towards the optimal policy obtained in the E-step (M-step) Empirical evaluations conducted in complex and uncertain environments validate the effectiveness of our proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:33:55Z)
• Trust-Region-Free Policy Optimization for Stochastic Policies [60.52463923712565]
  We show that the trust region constraint over policies can be safely substituted by a trust-region-free constraint without compromising the underlying monotonic improvement guarantee. We call the resulting algorithm Trust-REgion-Free Policy Optimization (TREFree) explicit as it is free of any trust region constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T23:10:06Z)
• Penalized Proximal Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning [68.86485583981866]
  We propose Penalized Proximal Policy Optimization (P3O), which solves the cumbersome constrained policy iteration via a single minimization of an equivalent unconstrained problem. P3O utilizes a simple-yet-effective penalty function to eliminate cost constraints and removes the trust-region constraint by the clipped surrogate objective. We show that P3O outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms with respect to both reward improvement and constraint satisfaction on a set of constrained locomotive tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T06:15:51Z)
• Off-Policy Evaluation with Policy-Dependent Optimization Response [90.28758112893054]
  We develop a new framework for off-policy evaluation with a textitpolicy-dependent linear optimization response. We construct unbiased estimators for the policy-dependent estimand by a perturbation method. We provide a general algorithm for optimizing causal interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T20:25:37Z)
• Constrained Variational Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning [40.38842532850959]
  Safe reinforcement learning aims to learn policies that satisfy certain constraints before deploying to safety-critical applications. primal-dual as a prevalent constrained optimization framework suffers from instability issues and lacks optimality guarantees. This paper overcomes the issues from a novel probabilistic inference perspective and proposes an Expectation-Maximization style approach to learn safe policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T04:24:09Z)
• Understanding the Effect of Stochasticity in Policy Optimization [86.7574122154668]
  We show that the preferability of optimization methods depends critically on whether exact gradients are used. Second, to explain these findings we introduce the concept of committal rate for policy optimization. Third, we show that in the absence of external oracle information, there is an inherent trade-off between exploiting geometry to accelerate convergence versus achieving optimality almost surely.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T06:35:44Z)
• Constrained Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for Process Optimization [0.0]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) is a control approach that can handle nonlinear optimal control problems. Despite the promise exhibited, RL has yet to see marked translation to industrial practice. We propose an 'oracle'-assisted constrained Q-learning algorithm that guarantees the satisfaction of joint chance constraints with a high probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-16T13:16:22Z)
• CRPO: A New Approach for Safe Reinforcement Learning with Convergence Guarantee [61.176159046544946]
  In safe reinforcement learning (SRL) problems, an agent explores the environment to maximize an expected total reward and avoids violation of certain constraints. This is the first-time analysis of SRL algorithms with global optimal policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-11T16:05:14Z)
• Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Optimization under Uncertainty [1.5797349391370117]
  Dynamic real-time optimization (DRTO) is a challenging task due to the fact that optimal operating conditions must be computed in real time. The main bottleneck in the industrial application of DRTO is the presence of uncertainty. We present a constrained reinforcement learning (RL) based approach to accommodate these difficulties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T10:17:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.