Related papers: Vindication, Virtue and Vitriol: A study of online engagement and abuse toward British MPs during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Vindication, Virtue and Vitriol: A study of online engagement and abuse toward British MPs during the COVID-19 Pandemic

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05261v1
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:11:22 GMT
Title: Vindication, Virtue and Vitriol: A study of online engagement and abuse toward British MPs during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Authors: Tracie Farrell, Genevieve Gorrell and Kalina Bontcheva
Abstract summary: We study abusive and antagonistic responses to UK politicians during the pandemic from early February to late May 2020. We find that pressing subjects such as financial concerns attract high levels of engagement, but not necessarily abusive dialogue. In particular, those who carry the flame for subjects like racism and inequality, may be accused of virtue signalling or receive higher abuse levels due to the topics they are required to address.
Score: 2.789514662632911
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: COVID-19 has given rise to malicious content online, including online abuse and hate toward British MPs. In order to understand and contextualise the level of abuse MPs receive, we consider how ministers use social media to communicate about the crisis, and the citizen engagement that this generates. The focus of the paper is on a large-scale, mixed methods study of abusive and antagonistic responses to UK politicians during the pandemic from early February to late May 2020. We find that pressing subjects such as financial concerns attract high levels of engagement, but not necessarily abusive dialogue. Rather, criticising authorities appears to attract higher levels of abuse. In particular, those who carry the flame for subjects like racism and inequality, may be accused of virtue signalling or receive higher abuse levels due to the topics they are required by their role to address. This work contributes to the wider understanding of abusive language online, in particular that which is directed at public officials.

Related papers

Journalists are most likely to receive abuse: Analysing online abuse of UK public figures across sport, politics, and journalism on Twitter [0.0]
We present analysis of a novel dataset of 45.5M tweets targeted at 4,602 UK public figures across 3 domains. We show that MPs receive more abuse in absolute terms, but that journalists are most likely to receive abuse after controlling for other factors. We also find that a more prominent online presence and being male are indicative of higher levels of abuse across all 3 domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-05T09:27:56Z)
Large Language Models can impersonate politicians and other public figures [47.2573979612036]
Modern AI technology like Large language models (LLMs) has the potential to pollute the public information sphere with made-up content. We present the results of a study based on a cross-section of British society. LLMs are able to generate responses to debate questions that were part of a broadcast political debate programme in the UK.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T11:16:19Z)
Demarked: A Strategy for Enhanced Abusive Speech Moderation through Counterspeech, Detoxification, and Message Management [71.99446449877038]
We propose a more comprehensive approach called Demarcation scoring abusive speech based on four aspect -- (i) severity scale; (ii) presence of a target; (iii) context scale; (iv) legal scale. Our work aims to inform future strategies for effectively addressing abusive speech online.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T21:45:33Z)
Tainted Love: A Systematic Review of Online Romance Fraud [68.8204255655161]
Romance fraud involves cybercriminals engineering a romantic relationship on online dating platforms. We characterise the literary landscape on romance fraud, advancing the understanding of researchers and practitioners. Three main contributions were identified: profiles of romance scams, countermeasures for mitigating romance scams, and factors that predispose an individual to become a scammer or a victim.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-28T20:34:07Z)
The Online Behaviour of the Algerian Abusers in Social Media Networks [0.0]
This paper is a statistical study on the cyber-bullying and the abusive content in social media. We try to spot the online behaviour of the abusers in the Algerian community. The aim of this investigation is to aid automatic systems of abuse detection to take decision by incorporating the online activity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-19T18:22:06Z)
Beyond Plain Toxic: Detection of Inappropriate Statements on Flammable Topics for the Russian Language [76.58220021791955]
We present two text collections labelled according to binary notion of inapropriateness and a multinomial notion of sensitive topic. To objectivise the notion of inappropriateness, we define it in a data-driven way though crowdsourcing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-04T15:59:06Z)
Fragments of the Past: Curating Peer Support with Perpetrators of Domestic Violence [88.37416552778178]
We report on a ten-month study where we worked with six support workers and eighteen perpetrators in the design and deployment of Fragments of the Past. We share how crafting digitally-augmented artefacts - 'fragments' - of experiences of desisting from violence can translate messages for motivation and rapport between peers. These insights provide the basis for practical considerations for future network design with challenging populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-09T22:57:43Z)
MP Twitter Engagement and Abuse Post-first COVID-19 Lockdown in the UK: White Paper [1.9830978436021898]
This work covers the period of June to December 2020 and analyses Twitter abuse in replies to UK MPs. We have found that abuse levels toward UK MPs were at an all-time high in December 2020 (5.4% of all reply tweets sent to MPs) In a departure from the trend seen in the first four months of the pandemic, MPs from the Tory party received the highest percentage of abusive replies from July 2020 onward.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-04T09:45:00Z)
MP Twitter Abuse in the Age of COVID-19: White Paper [2.789514662632911]
In the UK there were uncivil tweets to MPs about perceived UK tardiness to go into lockdown. Prime minister Boris Johnson's severe illness with COVID-19 resulted in an unusual peak of supportive responses on Twitter. Following Mr Johnson's recovery, with rising economic concerns and anger about lockdown violations by influential figures, abuse levels began to rise in May. 1,902 replies to MPs within the study period were found containing hashtags or terms that refute the existence of the virus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-10T16:21:42Z)
The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the General Public to the COVID-19 Pandemic [66.80677233314002]
Pandemic of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented governments with ultimate challenges. In the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President. This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society by mining people's opinions on social media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T13:02:38Z)
Online Abuse toward Candidates during the UK General Election 2019: Working Paper [0.9741305928417096]
We collected 4.2 million tweets sent to or from election candidates in the six week period spanning from the start of November until shortly after the December 12th election. We found abuse in 4.46% of replies received by candidates, up from 3.27% in the matching period for the 2017 UK general election. On average, men received more general and political abuse; women received more sexist abuse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-23T17:28:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.