MP Twitter Engagement and Abuse Post-first COVID-19 Lockdown in the UK: White Paper

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.02917v2
• Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:45:29 GMT
• Title: MP Twitter Engagement and Abuse Post-first COVID-19 Lockdown in the UK: White Paper
• Authors: Tracie Farrell, Mehmet Bakir, Kalina Bontcheva
• Abstract summary: This work covers the period of June to December 2020 and analyses Twitter abuse in replies to UK MPs. We have found that abuse levels toward UK MPs were at an all-time high in December 2020 (5.4% of all reply tweets sent to MPs) In a departure from the trend seen in the first four months of the pandemic, MPs from the Tory party received the highest percentage of abusive replies from July 2020 onward.
• Score: 1.9830978436021898
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The UK has had a volatile political environment for some years now, with Brexit and leadership crises marking the past five years. With this work, we wanted to understand more about how the global health emergency, COVID-19, influences the amount, type or topics of abuse that UK politicians receive when engaging with the public. With this work, we wanted to understand more about how the global health emergency, COVID-19, influences the amount, type or topics of abuse that UK politicians receive when engaging with the public. This work covers the period of June to December 2020 and analyses Twitter abuse in replies to UK MPs. This work is a follow-up from our analysis of online abuse during the first four months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. The paper examines overall abuse levels during this new seven month period, analyses reactions to members of different political parties and the UK government, and the relationship between online abuse and topics such as Brexit, government's COVID-19 response and policies, and social issues. In addition, we have also examined the presence of conspiracy theories posted in abusive replies to MPs during the period. We have found that abuse levels toward UK MPs were at an all-time high in December 2020 (5.4% of all reply tweets sent to MPs). This is almost 1% higher that the two months preceding the General Election. In a departure from the trend seen in the first four months of the pandemic, MPs from the Tory party received the highest percentage of abusive replies from July 2020 onward, which stays above 5% starting from September 2020 onward, as the COVID-19 crisis deepened and the Brexit negotiations with the EU started nearing completion.

Related papers

• Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican legislative election [55.41644538483948]
  We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day. We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• American Twitter Users Revealed Social Determinants-related Oral Health Disparities amid the COVID-19 Pandemic [72.44305630014534]
  We collected oral health-related tweets during the COVID-19 pandemic from 9,104 Twitter users across 26 states. Women and younger adults (19-29) are more likely to talk about oral health problems. People from counties at a higher risk of COVID-19 talk more about tooth decay/gum bleeding and chipped tooth/tooth break.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T01:10:06Z)
• When a crisis strikes: Emotion analysis and detection during COVID-19 [96.03869351276478]
  We present CovidEmo, 1K tweets labeled with emotions. We examine how well large pre-trained language models generalize across domains and crises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T04:07:14Z)
• Transfer Learning Approach for Detecting Psychological Distress in Brexit Tweets [0.665264113799989]
  In 2016, United Kingdom (UK) citizens voted to leave the European Union (EU), which was officially implemented in 2020. This paper uses a transfer learning approach for sentiment analysis to measure the non-clinical psychological distress status in Brexit tweets. The framework applies a domain adaptation technique to decrease the impact of negative transfer between source and target domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-25T16:54:37Z)
• Vindication, Virtue and Vitriol: A study of online engagement and abuse toward British MPs during the COVID-19 Pandemic [2.789514662632911]
  We study abusive and antagonistic responses to UK politicians during the pandemic from early February to late May 2020. We find that pressing subjects such as financial concerns attract high levels of engagement, but not necessarily abusive dialogue. In particular, those who carry the flame for subjects like racism and inequality, may be accused of virtue signalling or receive higher abuse levels due to the topics they are required to address.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T12:11:22Z)
• Dutch General Public Reaction on Governmental COVID-19 Measures and Announcements in Twitter Data [1.7289766438701686]
  We collect streaming data using the Twitter API starting from the COVID-19 outbreak in the Netherlands in February 2020. We track Dutch general public reactions on governmental measures and announcements. We provide temporal analysis of tweet frequency and public sentiment over the past seven months.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T16:03:58Z)
• MP Twitter Abuse in the Age of COVID-19: White Paper [2.789514662632911]
  In the UK there were uncivil tweets to MPs about perceived UK tardiness to go into lockdown. Prime minister Boris Johnson's severe illness with COVID-19 resulted in an unusual peak of supportive responses on Twitter. Following Mr Johnson's recovery, with rising economic concerns and anger about lockdown violations by influential figures, abuse levels began to rise in May. 1,902 replies to MPs within the study period were found containing hashtags or terms that refute the existence of the virus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T16:21:42Z)
• Analyzing COVID-19 on Online Social Media: Trends, Sentiments and Emotions [44.92240076313168]
  We analyze the affective trajectories of the American people and the Chinese people based on Twitter and Weibo posts between January 20th, 2020 and May 11th 2020. By contrasting two very different countries, China and the Unites States, we reveal sharp differences in people's views on COVID-19 in different cultures. Our study provides a computational approach to unveiling public emotions and concerns on the pandemic in real-time, which would potentially help policy-makers better understand people's need and thus make optimal policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-29T09:24:38Z)
• The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the General Public to the COVID-19 Pandemic [66.80677233314002]
  Pandemic of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented governments with ultimate challenges. In the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President. This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society by mining people's opinions on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T13:02:38Z)
• Online Abuse toward Candidates during the UK General Election 2019: Working Paper [0.9741305928417096]
  We collected 4.2 million tweets sent to or from election candidates in the six week period spanning from the start of November until shortly after the December 12th election. We found abuse in 4.46% of replies received by candidates, up from 3.27% in the matching period for the 2017 UK general election. On average, men received more general and political abuse; women received more sexist abuse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-23T17:28:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.