False Detection (Positives and Negatives) in Object Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.06986v1
• Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 20:09:05 GMT
• Title: False Detection (Positives and Negatives) in Object Detection
• Authors: Subrata Goswami
• Abstract summary: This study explores ways of reducing false positives and negatives with labelled data. In the process also discovered insufficient labelling in Openimage 2019 Object Detection dataset.
• Score: 1.0965065178451106
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Object detection is a very important function of visual perception systems. Since the early days of classical object detection based on HOG to modern deep learning based detectors, object detection has improved in accuracy. Two stage detectors usually have higher accuracy than single stage ones. Both types of detectors use some form of quantization of the search space of rectangular regions of image. There are far more of the quantized elements than true objects. The way these bounding boxes are filtered out possibly results in the false positive and false negatives. This empirical experimental study explores ways of reducing false positives and negatives with labelled data.. In the process also discovered insufficient labelling in Openimage 2019 Object Detection dataset.

Related papers

• Bounding Box Stability against Feature Dropout Reflects Detector Generalization across Environments [52.65013932553849]
  Good detectors tend to output bounding boxes whose locations do not change much, while bounding boxes of poor detectors will undergo noticeable position changes. We compute the box stability score (BoS score) to reflect this stability. We contribute to finding that BoS score has a strong, positive correlation with detection accuracy measured by mean average precision (mAP) under various test environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T17:59:16Z)
• Zone Evaluation: Revealing Spatial Bias in Object Detection [69.59295428233844]
  A fundamental limitation of object detectors is that they suffer from "spatial bias" We present a new zone evaluation protocol, which measures the detection performance over zones. For the first time, we provide numerical results, showing that the object detectors perform quite unevenly across the zones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T01:44:49Z)
• Outlier galaxy images in the Dark Energy Survey and their identification with unsupervised machine learning [0.0]
  This study applies an automatic method for automatic detection of outlier objects in the first data release of the Dark Energy Survey. An important feature of the algorithm is that it allows to control the false-positive rate, and therefore can be used for practical outlier detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T18:39:35Z)
• Focus-and-Detect: A Small Object Detection Framework for Aerial Images [1.911678487931003]
  We propose a two-stage object detection framework called "Focus-and-Detect" The first stage generates clusters of objects constituting the focused regions. The second stage, which is also an object detector network, predicts objects within the focal regions. Results indicate that the proposed two-stage framework achieves an AP score of 42.06 on VisDrone validation dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-24T10:43:56Z)
• Fast Rule-Based Clutter Detection in Automotive Radar Data [10.379073531824456]
  Automotive radar sensors output a lot of unwanted clutter or ghost detections. clutter detections occur in groups or at similar locations in multiple consecutive measurements. New algorithm for identifying such erroneous detections is presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-27T11:32:50Z)
• Slender Object Detection: Diagnoses and Improvements [74.40792217534]
  In this paper, we are concerned with the detection of a particular type of objects with extreme aspect ratios, namely textbfslender objects. For a classical object detection method, a drastic drop of $18.9%$ mAP on COCO is observed, if solely evaluated on slender objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T09:39:42Z)
• Black-box Explanation of Object Detectors via Saliency Maps [66.745167677293]
  We propose D-RISE, a method for generating visual explanations for the predictions of object detectors. We show that D-RISE can be easily applied to different object detectors including one-stage detectors such as YOLOv3 and two-stage detectors such as Faster-RCNN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-05T02:13:35Z)
• BiDet: An Efficient Binarized Object Detector [96.19708396510894]
  We propose a binarized neural network learning method called BiDet for efficient object detection. Our BiDet fully utilizes the representational capacity of the binary neural networks for object detection by redundancy removal. Our method outperforms the state-of-the-art binary neural networks by a sizable margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-09T08:16:16Z)
• Object Detection as a Positive-Unlabeled Problem [78.2955013126312]
  We propose treating object detection as a positive-unlabeled (PU) problem, which removes the assumption that unlabeled regions must be negative. We demonstrate that our proposed PU classification loss outperforms the standard PN loss on PASCAL VOC and MS COCO across a range of label missingness, as well as on Visual Genome and DeepLesion with full labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-11T20:49:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.