Learning from students' perception on professors through opinion mining
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11183v1
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:36:45 GMT
- Title: Learning from students' perception on professors through opinion mining
- Authors: Vladimir Vargas-Calder\'on and Juan S. Fl\'orez and Leonel F. Ardila
and Nicolas Parra-A. and Jorge E. Camargo and Nelson Vargas
- Abstract summary: Students' perception of classes measured through their opinions on teaching surveys allows to identify deficiencies and problems.
The purpose of this paper is to study, through sentiment analysis using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) techniques.
It is implemented, trained and tested two algorithms to predict the associated sentiment as well as the relevant topics of such opinions.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Students' perception of classes measured through their opinions on teaching
surveys allows to identify deficiencies and problems, both in the environment
and in the learning methodologies. The purpose of this paper is to study,
through sentiment analysis using natural language processing (NLP) and machine
learning (ML) techniques, those opinions in order to identify topics that are
relevant for students, as well as predicting the associated sentiment via
polarity analysis. As a result, it is implemented, trained and tested two
algorithms to predict the associated sentiment as well as the relevant topics
of such opinions. The combination of both approaches then becomes useful to
identify specific properties of the students' opinions associated with each
sentiment label (positive, negative or neutral opinions) and topic.
Furthermore, we explore the possibility that students' perception surveys are
carried out without closed questions, relying on the information that students
can provide through open questions where they express their opinions about
their classes.
Related papers
- Exploring Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues [53.52699766206808]
We present a first attempt at performing knowledge tracing (KT) in tutor-student dialogues.
We propose methods to identify the knowledge components/skills involved in each dialogue turn.
We then apply a range of KT methods on the resulting labeled data to track student knowledge levels over an entire dialogue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-24T22:31:39Z) - How Do Students Interact with an LLM-powered Virtual Teaching Assistant in Different Educational Settings? [3.9134031118910264]
Jill Watson, a virtual teaching assistant powered by LLMs, answers student questions and engages them in extended conversations on courseware provided by the instructors.
In this paper, we analyze student interactions with Jill across multiple courses and colleges.
We find that, by supporting a wide range of cognitive demands, Jill encourages students to engage in sophisticated, higher-order cognitive questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T01:22:50Z) - Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes.
We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function.
Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z) - UKP-SQuARE: An Interactive Tool for Teaching Question Answering [61.93372227117229]
The exponential growth of question answering (QA) has made it an indispensable topic in any Natural Language Processing (NLP) course.
We introduce UKP-SQuARE as a platform for QA education.
Students can run, compare, and analyze various QA models from different perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T11:29:04Z) - Sentiment analysis and opinion mining on educational data: A survey [9.413091393107319]
Sentiment analysis AKA opinion mining is one of the most widely used NLP applications to identify human intentions from their reviews.
In the education sector, opinion mining is used to listen to student opinions and enhance their learning-teaching practices pedagogically.
With advancements in sentiment annotation techniques and AI methodologies, student comments can be labelled with their sentiment orientation without much human intervention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-08T22:14:08Z) - Summative Student Course Review Tool Based on Machine Learning Sentiment
Analysis to Enhance Life Science Feedback Efficacy [4.518390136757588]
We show a novel approach to summarizing and organizing students' opinions via analyzing their sentiment towards a course as a function of the language/vocabulary used.
This analysis is derived from their responses to a general comment section encountered at the end of post-course review surveys.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-15T19:56:56Z) - A literature survey on student feedback assessment tools and their usage
in sentiment analysis [0.0]
We evaluate the effectiveness of various in-class feedback assessment methods such as Kahoot!, Mentimeter, Padlet, and polling.
We propose a sentiment analysis model for extracting the explicit suggestions from the students' qualitative feedback comments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-09T06:56:30Z) - Are Top School Students More Critical of Their Professors? Mining
Comments on RateMyProfessor.com [83.2634062100579]
Student reviews and comments on RateMyProfessor.com reflect realistic learning experiences of students.
Our study proves that student reviews and comments contain crucial information and can serve as essential references for enrollment in courses and universities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-23T20:01:36Z) - Weakly-Supervised Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis via Joint
Aspect-Sentiment Topic Embedding [71.2260967797055]
We propose a weakly-supervised approach for aspect-based sentiment analysis.
We learn sentiment, aspect> joint topic embeddings in the word embedding space.
We then use neural models to generalize the word-level discriminative information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-13T21:33:24Z) - Neural Multi-Task Learning for Teacher Question Detection in Online
Classrooms [50.19997675066203]
We build an end-to-end neural framework that automatically detects questions from teachers' audio recordings.
By incorporating multi-task learning techniques, we are able to strengthen the understanding of semantic relations among different types of questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-16T02:17:04Z) - R2DE: a NLP approach to estimating IRT parameters of newly generated
questions [3.364554138758565]
R2DE is a model capable of assessing newly generated multiple-choice questions by looking at the text of the question.
In particular, it can estimate the difficulty and the discrimination of each question.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-21T14:31:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.