A Taxonomy of Knowledge Gaps for Wikimedia Projects (Second Draft)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.12314v2
• Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 17:35:17 GMT
• Title: A Taxonomy of Knowledge Gaps for Wikimedia Projects (Second Draft)
• Authors: Miriam Redi, Martin Gerlach, Isaac Johnson, Jonathan Morgan, and Leila Zia
• Abstract summary: We studied more than 250 references by scholars, researchers, practitioners, community members and affiliates. We describe, group and classify knowledge gaps into a structured framework.
• Score: 3.7972358681579377
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In January 2019, prompted by the Wikimedia Movement's 2030 strategic direction, the Research team at the Wikimedia Foundation identified the need to develop a knowledge gaps index -- a composite index to support the decision makers across the Wikimedia movement by providing: a framework to encourage structured and targeted brainstorming discussions; data on the state of the knowledge gaps across the Wikimedia projects that can inform decision making and assist with measuring the long term impact of large scale initiatives in the Movement. After its first release in July 2020, the Research team has developed the second complete draft of a taxonomy of knowledge gaps for the Wikimedia projects, as the first step towards building the knowledge gap index. We studied more than 250 references by scholars, researchers, practitioners, community members and affiliates -- exposing evidence of knowledge gaps in readership, contributorship, and content of Wikimedia projects. We elaborated the findings and compiled the taxonomy of knowledge gaps in this paper, where we describe, group and classify knowledge gaps into a structured framework. The taxonomy that you will learn more about in the rest of this work will serve as a basis to operationalize and quantify knowledge equity, one of the two 2030 strategic directions, through the knowledge gaps index.

Related papers

• Wikimedia data for AI: a review of Wikimedia datasets for NLP tasks and AI-assisted editing [3.960519546131734]
  We review the different ways in which Wikimedia data is curated to use in NLP tasks across pre-training, post-training, and model evaluations. We call for incorporating additional sources of Wikimedia data, a greater focus on benchmarks for LLMs that encode Wikimedia principles, and greater multilingualism in Wikimedia-derived datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T15:46:09Z)
• Fine-tuning and Prompt Engineering with Cognitive Knowledge Graphs for Scholarly Knowledge Organization [0.14999444543328289]
  This research focuses on effectively conveying structured scholarly knowledge by utilizing large language models (LLMs) LLMs categorize scholarly articles and describe their contributions in a structured and comparable manner. Our methodology involves harnessing LLM knowledge, and complementing it with domain expert-verified scholarly data sourced from a CKG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T11:31:02Z)
• Knowledge Navigator: LLM-guided Browsing Framework for Exploratory Search in Scientific Literature [48.572336666741194]
  We present Knowledge Navigator, a system designed to enhance exploratory search abilities. It organizes retrieved documents into a navigable, two-level hierarchy of named and descriptive scientific topics and subtopics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T14:48:37Z)
• Beyond Factuality: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models as Knowledge Generators [78.63553017938911]
  Large language models (LLMs) outperform information retrieval techniques for downstream knowledge-intensive tasks. However, community concerns abound regarding the factuality and potential implications of using this uncensored knowledge. We introduce CONNER, designed to evaluate generated knowledge from six important perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T08:22:37Z)
• KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models [87.96683299084788]
  We construct a Knowledge-oriented LLM Assessment benchmark (KoLA) We mimic human cognition to form a four-level taxonomy of knowledge-related abilities, covering $19$ tasks. We use both Wikipedia, a corpus prevalently pre-trained by LLMs, along with continuously collected emerging corpora, to evaluate the capacity to handle unseen data and evolving knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T17:20:46Z)
• Embedding Knowledge for Document Summarization: A Survey [66.76415502727802]
  Previous works proved that knowledge-embedded document summarizers excel at generating superior digests. We propose novel to recapitulate knowledge and knowledge embeddings under the document summarization view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-24T04:36:07Z)
• CO-NNECT: A Framework for Revealing Commonsense Knowledge Paths as Explicitations of Implicit Knowledge in Texts [12.94206336329289]
  We leverage commonsense knowledge in form of knowledge paths to establish connections between sentences. These connections can be direct (singlehop paths) or require intermediate concepts (multihop paths)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T10:43:43Z)
• Computational linguistic assessment of textbook and online learning media by means of threshold concepts in business education [59.003956312175795]
  From a linguistic perspective, threshold concepts are instances of specialized vocabularies, exhibiting particular linguistic features. The profiles of 63 threshold concepts from business education have been investigated in textbooks, newspapers, and Wikipedia. The three kinds of resources can indeed be distinguished in terms of their threshold concepts' profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T12:56:16Z)
• Architecture for a multilingual Wikipedia [0.0]
  We argue that we need a new approach to tackle this problem more effectively. This paper proposes an architecture for a system that fulfills this goal. It separates the goal in two parts: creating and maintaining content in an abstract notation within a project called Abstract Wikipedia, and creating an infrastructure called Wikilambda that can translate this notation to natural language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-08T22:25:10Z)
• A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applications [89.78089494738002]
  We review research topics about 1) knowledge graph representation learning, 2) knowledge acquisition and completion, 3) temporal knowledge graph, and 4) knowledge-aware applications. For knowledge acquisition, especially knowledge graph completion, embedding methods, path inference, and logical rule reasoning, are reviewed. We explore several emerging topics, including meta learning, commonsense reasoning, and temporal knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-02T13:17:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.