A Generic Methodology for the Statistically Uniform & Comparable Evaluation of Automated Trading Platform Components

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09993v4
• Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 21:33:21 GMT
• Title: A Generic Methodology for the Statistically Uniform & Comparable Evaluation of Automated Trading Platform Components
• Authors: Artur Sokolovsky and Luca Arnaboldi
• Abstract summary: The proposed methodology is showcased on two automated trading platform components. Namely, price levels, a well-known trading pattern, and a novel 2-step feature extraction method. The main hypothesis was formulated to evaluate whether the selected trading pattern is suitable for use in the machine learning setting.
• Score: 2.28438857884398
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Although machine learning approaches have been widely used in the field of finance, to very successful degrees, these approaches remain bespoke to specific investigations and opaque in terms of explainability, comparability, and reproducibility. The primary objective of this research was to shed light upon this field by providing a generic methodology that was investigation-agnostic and interpretable to a financial markets practitioner, thus enhancing their efficiency, reducing barriers to entry, and increasing the reproducibility of experiments. The proposed methodology is showcased on two automated trading platform components. Namely, price levels, a well-known trading pattern, and a novel 2-step feature extraction method. The methodology relies on hypothesis testing, which is widely applied in other social and scientific disciplines to effectively evaluate the concrete results beyond simple classification accuracy. The main hypothesis was formulated to evaluate whether the selected trading pattern is suitable for use in the machine learning setting. Across the experiments we found that the use of the considered trading pattern in the machine learning setting is only partially supported by statistics, resulting in insignificant effect sizes (Rebound 7 - $0.64 \pm 1.02$, Rebound 11 $0.38 \pm 0.98$, and rebound 15 - $1.05 \pm 1.16$), but allowed the rejection of the null hypothesis. We showcased the generic methodology on a US futures market instrument and provided evidence that with this methodology we could easily obtain informative metrics beyond the more traditional performance and profitability metrics. This work is one of the first in applying this rigorous statistically-backed approach to the field of financial markets and we hope this may be a springboard for more research.

Related papers

• Counterfactual Fairness by Combining Factual and Counterfactual Predictions [18.950415688199993]
  In high-stake domains such as healthcare and hiring, the role of machine learning (ML) in decision-making raises significant fairness concerns. This work focuses on Counterfactual Fairness (CF), which posits that an ML model's outcome on any individual should remain unchanged if they had belonged to a different demographic group. We provide a theoretical study on the inherent trade-off between CF and predictive performance in a model-agnostic manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T15:21:10Z)
• Ensuring Equitable Financial Decisions: Leveraging Counterfactual Fairness and Deep Learning for Bias [0.0]
  This research paper investigates advanced bias mitigation techniques, with a particular focus on counterfactual fairness in conjunction with data augmentation. The study looks into how these integrated approaches can lessen gender bias in the financial industry, specifically in loan approval procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T14:28:06Z)
• Provable Benefits of Policy Learning from Human Preferences in Contextual Bandit Problems [82.92678837778358]
  preference-based methods have demonstrated substantial success in empirical applications such as InstructGPT. We show how human bias and uncertainty in feedback modelings can affect the theoretical guarantees of these approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T17:50:24Z)
• FFB: A Fair Fairness Benchmark for In-Processing Group Fairness Methods [84.1077756698332]
  This paper introduces the Fair Fairness Benchmark (textsfFFB), a benchmarking framework for in-processing group fairness methods. We provide a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art methods to ensure different notions of group fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T19:51:28Z)
• In Search of Insights, Not Magic Bullets: Towards Demystification of the Model Selection Dilemma in Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation [92.51773744318119]
  This paper empirically investigates the strengths and weaknesses of different model selection criteria. We highlight that there is a complex interplay between selection strategies, candidate estimators and the data used for comparing them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T16:55:37Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Scalable Personalised Item Ranking through Parametric Density Estimation [53.44830012414444]
  Learning from implicit feedback is challenging because of the difficult nature of the one-class problem. Most conventional methods use a pairwise ranking approach and negative samplers to cope with the one-class problem. We propose a learning-to-rank approach, which achieves convergence speed comparable to the pointwise counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-11T03:38:16Z)
• Interpretable ML-driven Strategy for Automated Trading Pattern Extraction [2.7910505923792646]
  We propose a volume-based data pre-processing method for financial time series analysis. We use a statistical approach for assessing the performance of the method. Our analysis shows that the proposed method allows successful classification of the financial time series patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T09:55:46Z)
• Deep Portfolio Optimization via Distributional Prediction of Residual Factors [3.9189409002585562]
  We propose a novel method of constructing a portfolio based on predicting the distribution of a financial quantity called residual factors. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method on U.S. and Japanese stock market data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T04:09:52Z)
• Financial Data Analysis Using Expert Bayesian Framework For Bankruptcy Prediction [0.0]
  We propose another route of generative modeling using Expert Bayesian framework. The biggest advantage of the proposed framework is an explicit inclusion of expert judgment in the modeling process. The proposed approach is well suited for highly regulated or safety critical applications such as in finance or in medical diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T19:09:02Z)
• Learning the Truth From Only One Side of the Story [58.65439277460011]
  We focus on generalized linear models and show that without adjusting for this sampling bias, the model may converge suboptimally or even fail to converge to the optimal solution. We propose an adaptive approach that comes with theoretical guarantees and show that it outperforms several existing methods empirically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T18:20:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.