Online geolocalized emotion across US cities during the COVID crisis:
Universality, policy response, and connection with local mobility
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.10461v1
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:32:46 GMT
- Title: Online geolocalized emotion across US cities during the COVID crisis:
Universality, policy response, and connection with local mobility
- Abstract summary: We analyze around 13 million geotagged tweets in 49 cities across the US from the first few months of the pandemic.
We observe universal trends in overall and topic-based sentiments across cities over the time period studied.
These local sentiments are highly correlated with and predictive of city-level mobility, while the correlations between sentiments and local cases and deaths are relatively weak.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: As the COVID-19 pandemic began to sweep across the US it elicited a wide
spectrum of responses, both online and offline, across the population. To aid
the development of effective spatially targeted interventions in the midst of
this turmoil, it is important to understand the geolocalization of these online
emotional responses, as well as their association with offline behavioral
responses. Here, we analyze around 13 million geotagged tweets in 49 cities
across the US from the first few months of the pandemic to assess regional
dependence in online sentiments with respect to a few major topics, and how
these sentiments correlate with policy development and human mobility.
Surprisingly, we observe universal trends in overall and topic-based sentiments
across cities over the time period studied, with variability primarily seen
only in the immediate impact of federal guidelines and local lockdown policies.
We also find that these local sentiments are highly correlated with and
predictive of city-level mobility, while the correlations between sentiments
and local cases and deaths are relatively weak. Our findings point to
widespread commonalities in the online public emotional responses to COVID
across the US, both temporally and relative to offline indicators, in contrast
with the high variability seen in early local containment policies. This study
also provides new insights into the use of social media data in crisis
management by integrating offline data to gain an in-depth understanding of
public emotional responses, policy development, and local mobility.
Related papers
- Coordinated Pandemic Control with Large Language Model Agents as Policymaking Assistants [51.26321657927398]
We propose a large language model (LLM) multi-agent policymaking framework that supports coordinated and proactive pandemic control across regions.<n>By integrating real-world data, a pandemic evolution simulator, and structured inter-agent communication, our framework enables agents to jointly explore counterfactual intervention scenarios.<n>Compared with real-world pandemic outcomes, our approach reduces cumulative infections and deaths by up to 63.7% and 40.1%, respectively, at the individual state level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-14T07:59:44Z) - Community Shaping in the Digital Age: A Temporal Fusion Framework for Analyzing Discourse Fragmentation in Online Social Networks [45.58331196717468]
This research presents a framework for analyzing the dynamics of online communities in social media platforms.
By combining text classification and dynamic social network analysis, we uncover mechanisms driving community formation and evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T03:03:02Z) - Exploring the impact of social stress on the adaptive dynamics of
COVID-19: Typing the behavior of na\"ive populations faced with epidemics [43.50312332512221]
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light profound variations among different countries in terms of their adaptive dynamics.
This emphasizes the crucial role of cultural characteristics in natural disaster analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-23T11:05:54Z) - Socioeconomic disparities in mobility behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in developing countries [3.3100431501076844]
Mobile phone data have played a key role in quantifying human mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic.
We leveraged geolocation data from mobile-phone users and population census for 6 middle-income countries across 3 continents.
Users living in low-wealth neighborhoods were less likely to respond by self-isolating, relocating to rural areas, or refraining from commuting to work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-11T15:27:00Z) - Estimating Geographic Spillover Effects of COVID-19 Policies From
Large-Scale Mobility Networks [54.90772000796717]
County-level policies provide flexibility between regions, but may become less effective in the presence of geographic spillovers.
We estimate spillovers using a mobility network with billions of timestamped edges.
We find that county-level restrictions are only 54% as effective as statewide restrictions at reducing mobility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-12T20:16:54Z) - Exporting Geography Into A Virtual Landscape: A Global Pandemic Locally
Discussed [0.0]
The COVID-19 pandemic has been a global health crisis playing out in the age of social media.
By analyzing almost 300 geographically-linked COVID discussion communities on Reddit, we show how these discussions were organized geographically and temporally.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-13T17:09:49Z) - Deep Learning-Derived Optimal Aviation Strategies to Control Pandemics [13.952375733035428]
COVID-19 pandemic has affected countries across the world, demanding drastic public health policies to mitigate the spread of infection.
In this work, we investigated the impact of human mobility on COVID-19 infection dynamics at the global scale.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-12T12:35:09Z) - The Spread of Propaganda by Coordinated Communities on Social Media [43.2770127582382]
We analyze the spread of propaganda and its interplay with coordinated behavior on a large Twitter dataset about the 2019 UK general election.
The combination of the use of propaganda and coordinated behavior allows us to uncover the authenticity and harmfulness of the different communities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T13:39:10Z) - When a crisis strikes: Emotion analysis and detection during COVID-19 [96.03869351276478]
We present CovidEmo, 1K tweets labeled with emotions.
We examine how well large pre-trained language models generalize across domains and crises.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-23T04:07:14Z) - Topic, Sentiment and Impact Analysis: COVID19 Information Seeking on
Social Media [1.6328866317851185]
This study analysed a large Spatio-temporal tweet dataset of the Australian sphere related to COVID19.
The methodology included a volume analysis, dynamic topic modelling, sentiment detection, and semantic brand score.
The obtained insights are compared with independently observed phenomena such as government reported instances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-28T02:03:18Z) - Public risk perception and emotion on Twitter during the Covid-19
pandemic [0.0]
Natural language analysis of this text enables near-to-real-time monitoring of indicators of public risk perception.
We compare epidemiological indicators of the progression of the pandemic with indicators of the public perception of the pandemic constructed from 20 million unique Covid-19-related tweets.
We find evidence of psychophysical numbing: Twitter users increasingly fixate on mortality, but in a decreasingly emotional and increasingly analytic tone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-03T13:09:45Z) - Effectiveness and Compliance to Social Distancing During COVID-19 [72.94965109944707]
We use a detailed set of mobility data to evaluate the impact that stay-at-home orders had on the spread of COVID-19 in the US.
We show that there is a unidirectional Granger causality, from the median percentage of time spent daily at home to the daily number of COVID-19-related deaths with a lag of 2 weeks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-23T03:36:19Z) - Analyzing COVID-19 on Online Social Media: Trends, Sentiments and
Emotions [44.92240076313168]
We analyze the affective trajectories of the American people and the Chinese people based on Twitter and Weibo posts between January 20th, 2020 and May 11th 2020.
By contrasting two very different countries, China and the Unites States, we reveal sharp differences in people's views on COVID-19 in different cultures.
Our study provides a computational approach to unveiling public emotions and concerns on the pandemic in real-time, which would potentially help policy-makers better understand people's need and thus make optimal policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-29T09:24:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.