Public risk perception and emotion on Twitter during the Covid-19
pandemic
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.00854v2
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:06:24 GMT
- Title: Public risk perception and emotion on Twitter during the Covid-19
pandemic
- Authors: Joel Dyer and Blas Kolic
- Abstract summary: Natural language analysis of this text enables near-to-real-time monitoring of indicators of public risk perception.
We compare epidemiological indicators of the progression of the pandemic with indicators of the public perception of the pandemic constructed from 20 million unique Covid-19-related tweets.
We find evidence of psychophysical numbing: Twitter users increasingly fixate on mortality, but in a decreasingly emotional and increasingly analytic tone.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Successful navigation of the Covid-19 pandemic is predicated on public
cooperation with safety measures and appropriate perception of risk, in which
emotion and attention play important roles. Signatures of public emotion and
attention are present in social media data, thus natural language analysis of
this text enables near-to-real-time monitoring of indicators of public risk
perception. We compare key epidemiological indicators of the progression of the
pandemic with indicators of the public perception of the pandemic constructed
from ~20 million unique Covid-19-related tweets from 12 countries posted
between 10th March -- 14th June 2020. We find evidence of psychophysical
numbing: Twitter users increasingly fixate on mortality, but in a decreasingly
emotional and increasingly analytic tone. Semantic network analysis based on
word co-occurrences reveals changes in the emotional framing of Covid-19
casualties that are consistent with this hypothesis. We also find that the
average attention afforded to national Covid-19 mortality rates is modelled
accurately with the Weber-Fechner and power law functions of sensory
perception. Our parameter estimates for these models are consistent with
estimates from psychological experiments, and indicate that users in this
dataset exhibit differential sensitivity by country to the national Covid-19
death rates. Our work illustrates the potential utility of social media for
monitoring public risk perception and guiding public communication during
crisis scenarios.
Related papers
- Exploring celebrity influence on public attitude towards the COVID-19
pandemic: social media shared sentiment analysis [0.7340017786387767]
People have turned to social media networks to share sentiments related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
We examined the role of social messaging shared by Persons in the Public Eye in determining overall public discourse direction.
Our findings suggest the presence of consistent patterns of emotional content co-occurring with messaging shared by Persons in the Public Eye.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T21:56:50Z) - Coronavirus statistics causes emotional bias: a social media text mining
perspective [4.042350304426975]
This paper proposes a deep learning model which classifies texts related to the pandemic from text data with place labels.
Next, it conducts a sentiment analysis based on multi-task learning.
Finally, it carries out a fixed-effect panel regression with outputs of the sentiment analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-16T03:36:13Z) - When a crisis strikes: Emotion analysis and detection during COVID-19 [96.03869351276478]
We present CovidEmo, 1K tweets labeled with emotions.
We examine how well large pre-trained language models generalize across domains and crises.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-23T04:07:14Z) - Sentiment Analysis of Covid-19 Tweets using Evolutionary
Classification-Based LSTM Model [0.6445605125467573]
This paper represents the sentiment analysis on collected large number of tweets on Coronavirus or Covid-19.
We analyze the trend of public sentiment on the topics related to Covid-19 epidemic using an evolutionary classification followed by the n-gram analysis.
We trained the long-short term network using two types of rated tweets to predict sentiment on Covid-19 data and obtained an overall accuracy of 84.46%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-13T04:27:21Z) - COVID-19 and Big Data: Multi-faceted Analysis for Spatio-temporal
Understanding of the Pandemic with Social Media Conversations [4.07452542897703]
Social media platforms have served as a vehicle for the global conversation about COVID-19.
We present a framework for analysis, mining, and tracking the critical content and characteristics of social media conversations around the pandemic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-22T00:45:50Z) - Epidemic mitigation by statistical inference from contact tracing data [61.04165571425021]
We develop Bayesian inference methods to estimate the risk that an individual is infected.
We propose to use probabilistic risk estimation in order to optimize testing and quarantining strategies for the control of an epidemic.
Our approaches translate into fully distributed algorithms that only require communication between individuals who have recently been in contact.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-20T12:24:45Z) - Effectiveness and Compliance to Social Distancing During COVID-19 [72.94965109944707]
We use a detailed set of mobility data to evaluate the impact that stay-at-home orders had on the spread of COVID-19 in the US.
We show that there is a unidirectional Granger causality, from the median percentage of time spent daily at home to the daily number of COVID-19-related deaths with a lag of 2 weeks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-23T03:36:19Z) - Cross-lingual Transfer Learning for COVID-19 Outbreak Alignment [90.12602012910465]
We train on Italy's early COVID-19 outbreak through Twitter and transfer to several other countries.
Our experiments show strong results with up to 0.85 Spearman correlation in cross-country predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-05T02:04:25Z) - Analyzing COVID-19 on Online Social Media: Trends, Sentiments and
Emotions [44.92240076313168]
We analyze the affective trajectories of the American people and the Chinese people based on Twitter and Weibo posts between January 20th, 2020 and May 11th 2020.
By contrasting two very different countries, China and the Unites States, we reveal sharp differences in people's views on COVID-19 in different cultures.
Our study provides a computational approach to unveiling public emotions and concerns on the pandemic in real-time, which would potentially help policy-makers better understand people's need and thus make optimal policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-29T09:24:38Z) - COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic.
We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z) - Causal Modeling of Twitter Activity During COVID-19 [0.0]
We propose a causal inference approach to discover and quantify causal relationships between pandemic characteristics and Twitter activity.
Our results show that the proposed method can successfully capture the epidemiological domain knowledge.
We believe our work contributes to the field of infodemiology by distinguishing events that correlate with public attention from events that cause public attention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-16T11:07:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.