Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.12562v1
• Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:50:33 GMT
• Title: Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approach
• Authors: Cuong Tran, Ferdinando Fioretto, Pascal Van Hentenryck
• Abstract summary: This paper studies a model that protects the privacy of the individuals sensitive information while also allowing it to learn non-discriminatory predictors. The method relies on the notion of differential privacy and the use of Lagrangian duality to design neural networks that can accommodate fairness constraints.
• Score: 54.32266555843765
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A critical concern in data-driven decision making is to build models whose outcomes do not discriminate against some demographic groups, including gender, ethnicity, or age. To ensure non-discrimination in learning tasks, knowledge of the sensitive attributes is essential, while, in practice, these attributes may not be available due to legal and ethical requirements. To address this challenge, this paper studies a model that protects the privacy of the individuals sensitive information while also allowing it to learn non-discriminatory predictors. The method relies on the notion of differential privacy and the use of Lagrangian duality to design neural networks that can accommodate fairness constraints while guaranteeing the privacy of sensitive attributes. The paper analyses the tension between accuracy, privacy, and fairness and the experimental evaluation illustrates the benefits of the proposed model on several prediction tasks.

Related papers

• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• Independent Distribution Regularization for Private Graph Embedding [55.24441467292359]
  Graph embeddings are susceptible to attribute inference attacks, which allow attackers to infer private node attributes from the learned graph embeddings. To address these concerns, privacy-preserving graph embedding methods have emerged. We propose a novel approach called Private Variational Graph AutoEncoders (PVGAE) with the aid of independent distribution penalty as a regularization term.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T13:32:43Z)
• Training Private Models That Know What They Don't Know [40.19666295972155]
  We find that several popular selective prediction approaches are ineffective in a differentially private setting. We propose a novel evaluation mechanism which isolate selective prediction performance across model utility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T12:20:07Z)
• SF-PATE: Scalable, Fair, and Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles [50.90773979394264]
  This paper studies a model that protects the privacy of individuals' sensitive information while also allowing it to learn non-discriminatory predictors. A key characteristic of the proposed model is to enable the adoption of off-the-selves and non-private fair models to create a privacy-preserving and fair model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:42:54Z)
• Measuring Fairness Under Unawareness of Sensitive Attributes: A Quantification-Based Approach [131.20444904674494]
  We tackle the problem of measuring group fairness under unawareness of sensitive attributes. We show that quantification approaches are particularly suited to tackle the fairness-under-unawareness problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-17T13:45:46Z)
• Why Should I Trust a Model is Private? Using Shifts in Model Explanation for Evaluating Privacy-Preserving Emotion Recognition Model [35.016050900061]
  We focus on using interpretable methods to evaluate a model's efficacy to preserve privacy with respect to sensitive variables. We show how certain commonly-used methods that seek to preserve privacy might not align with human perception of privacy preservation. We conduct crowdsourcing experiments to evaluate the inclination of the evaluators to choose a particular model for a given task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T09:56:41Z)
• Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy [70.818129585404]
  We experimentally demonstrate that networks, trained with differential privacy, in some settings might be even more vulnerable in comparison to non-private versions. We study how the main ingredients of differentially private neural networks training, such as gradient clipping and noise addition, affect the robustness of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T18:59:24Z)
• Improving Fairness and Privacy in Selection Problems [21.293367386282902]
  We study the possibility of using a differentially private exponential mechanism as a post-processing step to improve both fairness and privacy of supervised learning models. We show that the exponential mechanism can improve both privacy and fairness, with a slight decrease in accuracy compared to the model without post-processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T15:55:28Z)
• Fairness-Aware Learning with Prejudice Free Representations [2.398608007786179]
  We propose a novel algorithm that can effectively identify and treat latent discriminating features. The approach helps to collect discrimination-free features that would improve the model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T10:06:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.