A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.00711v1
• Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 22:33:21 GMT
• Title: A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processing
• Authors: Marina Danilevsky, Kun Qian, Ranit Aharonov, Yannis Katsis, Ban Kawas, Prithviraj Sen
• Abstract summary: This survey presents an overview of the current state of Explainable AI (XAI) We discuss the main categorization of explanations, as well as the various ways explanations can be arrived at and visualized. We detail the operations and explainability techniques currently available for generating explanations for NLP model predictions, to serve as a resource for model developers in the community.
• Score: 16.660110121500125
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent years have seen important advances in the quality of state-of-the-art models, but this has come at the expense of models becoming less interpretable. This survey presents an overview of the current state of Explainable AI (XAI), considered within the domain of Natural Language Processing (NLP). We discuss the main categorization of explanations, as well as the various ways explanations can be arrived at and visualized. We detail the operations and explainability techniques currently available for generating explanations for NLP model predictions, to serve as a resource for model developers in the community. Finally, we point out the current gaps and encourage directions for future work in this important research area.

Related papers

• Evaluating the Utility of Model Explanations for Model Development [54.23538543168767]
  We evaluate whether explanations can improve human decision-making in practical scenarios of machine learning model development. To our surprise, we did not find evidence of significant improvement on tasks when users were provided with any of the saliency maps. These findings suggest caution regarding the usefulness and potential for misunderstanding in saliency-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T23:13:23Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• Explaining Explainability: Towards Deeper Actionable Insights into Deep Learning through Second-order Explainability [70.60433013657693]
  Second-order explainable AI (SOXAI) was recently proposed to extend explainable AI (XAI) from the instance level to the dataset level. We demonstrate for the first time, via example classification and segmentation cases, that eliminating irrelevant concepts from the training set based on actionable insights from SOXAI can enhance a model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T23:24:01Z)
• Faithfulness Tests for Natural Language Explanations [87.01093277918599]
  Explanations of neural models aim to reveal a model's decision-making process for its predictions. Recent work shows that current methods giving explanations such as saliency maps or counterfactuals can be misleading. This work explores the challenging question of evaluating the faithfulness of natural language explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T11:40:37Z)
• Rationalization for Explainable NLP: A Survey [6.843420921654749]
  Black-box models make it difficult to understand the internals of a system and the process it takes to arrive at an output. Numerical (LIME, Shapley) and visualization (saliency heatmap) explainability techniques are helpful; however, they are insufficient because they require specialized knowledge. Rationalization justifies a model's output by providing a natural language explanation (rationale)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-21T07:58:03Z)
• On the Explainability of Natural Language Processing Deep Models [3.0052400859458586]
  Methods have been developed to address the challenges and present satisfactory explanations on Natural Language Processing (NLP) models. Motivated to democratize ExAI methods in the NLP field, we present in this work a survey that studies model-agnostic as well as model-specific explainability methods on NLP models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T11:59:39Z)
• Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Survey [48.690624266879155]
  End-to-end neural Natural Language Processing (NLP) models are notoriously difficult to understand. One desideratum of model explanation is faithfulness, i.e. an explanation should accurately represent the reasoning process behind the model's prediction. We review over 110 model explanation methods in NLP through the lens of faithfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T21:40:51Z)
• Explainability in Process Outcome Prediction: Guidelines to Obtain Interpretable and Faithful Models [77.34726150561087]
  We define explainability through the interpretability of the explanations and the faithfulness of the explainability model in the field of process outcome prediction. This paper contributes a set of guidelines named X-MOP which allows selecting the appropriate model based on the event log specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T05:59:50Z)
• A Survey of Knowledge Enhanced Pre-trained Models [28.160826399552462]
  We refer to pre-trained language models with knowledge injection as knowledge-enhanced pre-trained language models (KEPLMs) These models demonstrate deep understanding and logical reasoning and introduce interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-01T08:51:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.