Facebook Political Ads And Accountability: Outside Groups Are Most Negative, Especially When Hiding Donors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01730v4
• Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:38:02 GMT
• Title: Facebook Political Ads And Accountability: Outside Groups Are Most Negative, Especially When Hiding Donors
• Authors: Shomik Jain, Abby K. Wood
• Abstract summary: We analyze how transparency and accountability deficits relate to the sentiment of political ads on Facebook. The most negative advertising came from dark money and disappearing outside groups. Only dark money was associated with a significant decrease in ad sentiment.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of online political advertising has come with little regulation, allowing political advertisers on social media to avoid accountability. We analyze how transparency and accountability deficits caused by dark money and disappearing groups relate to the sentiment of political ads on Facebook. We obtained 430,044 ads with FEC-registered advertisers from Facebook's ad library that ran between August-November 2018. We compare ads run by candidates, parties, and outside groups, which we classify by (1) their donor transparency (dark money or disclosed) and (2) the group's permanence (only FEC-registered in 2018 or persistent across cycles). The most negative advertising came from dark money and disappearing outside groups, which were mostly corporations or 501(c) organizations. However, only dark money was associated with a significant decrease in ad sentiment. These results suggest that accountability for political speech matters for advertising tone, especially in the context of affective polarization on social media.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Before Blue Birds Became X-tinct: Understanding the Effect of Regime Change on Twitter's Advertising and Compliance of Advertising Policies [0.562479170374811]
  We present the first large-scale audit of advertising on Twitter focusing on compliance with the platform's advertising policies. We find evidence of widespread noncompliance with Twitter's political and adult content advertising policies. Major brands decreased their advertising on Twitter, suggesting a negative immediate effect on the platform's advertising revenue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T02:39:53Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• Theme Analysis of Political Facebook Ads in the 2021 Dutch General Election [0.0]
  The Cambridge Analytica scandal revealed that political campaigns are using social media on a large scale. One such transparency effort is the Facebook Ad Library, a public repository of all political ads run on Facebook and Instagram. This paper analyses political ads in more depth, by examining the themes that ads are about.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-12T16:05:53Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Understanding the Complexity of Detecting Political Ads [0.9391375268580806]
  We take an empirical approach to analyze what kind of ads are deemed political by ordinary people and what kind of ads lead to disagreement. Our results imply that it is important to consider social issue ads as political, but they also complicate political advertising regulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T07:44:08Z)
• Facebook Ads: Politics of Migration in Italy [12.947791375188022]
  We employ a new resource for political ad monitoring -- Facebook Ads Library -- to examine advertising concerning the issue of immigration in Italy. We find evidence of targeting by the parties both in terms of geography and demographics (age and gender) We urge the research community to include online advertising in the monitoring of public discourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T09:32:31Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
• Facebook Ads Monitor: An Independent Auditing System for Political Ads on Facebook [1.2070251470948772]
  We designed and deployed an independent auditing system to monitor political ads on Facebook in Brazil. To do that, we first adapted a browser plugin to gather ads from the timeline of volunteers using Facebook. Then, we use a Convolution Neural Network (CNN) to detect political Facebook ads using word embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-28T20:34:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.