RoFT: A Tool for Evaluating Human Detection of Machine-Generated Text

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03070v1
• Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 22:47:43 GMT
• Title: RoFT: A Tool for Evaluating Human Detection of Machine-Generated Text
• Authors: Liam Dugan, Daphne Ippolito, Arun Kirubarajan and Chris Callison-Burch
• Abstract summary: We present Real or Fake Text (RoFT), a website that invites users to try their hand at detecting machine-generated text. We show preliminary results of using RoFT to evaluate detection of machine-generated news articles.
• Score: 25.80571756447762
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, large neural networks for natural language generation (NLG) have made leaps and bounds in their ability to generate fluent text. However, the tasks of evaluating quality differences between NLG systems and understanding how humans perceive the generated text remain both crucial and difficult. In this system demonstration, we present Real or Fake Text (RoFT), a website that tackles both of these challenges by inviting users to try their hand at detecting machine-generated text in a variety of domains. We introduce a novel evaluation task based on detecting the boundary at which a text passage that starts off human-written transitions to being machine-generated. We show preliminary results of using RoFT to evaluate detection of machine-generated news articles.

Related papers

• GigaCheck: Detecting LLM-generated Content [72.27323884094953]
  In this work, we investigate the task of generated text detection by proposing the GigaCheck. Our research explores two approaches: (i) distinguishing human-written texts from LLM-generated ones, and (ii) detecting LLM-generated intervals in Human-Machine collaborative texts. Specifically, we use a fine-tuned general-purpose LLM in conjunction with a DETR-like detection model, adapted from computer vision, to localize artificially generated intervals within text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T08:30:55Z)
• RKadiyala at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Black-Box Word-Level Text Boundary Detection in Partially Machine Generated Texts [0.0]
  This paper introduces few reliable approaches for identifying which part of a given text is machine generated at a word level. We present a comparison with proprietary systems, performance of our model on unseen domains' and generators' texts. The findings reveal significant improvements in detection accuracy along with comparison on other aspects of detection capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T03:21:59Z)
• Detecting Machine-Generated Long-Form Content with Latent-Space Variables [54.07946647012579]
  Existing zero-shot detectors primarily focus on token-level distributions, which are vulnerable to real-world domain shifts. We propose a more robust method that incorporates abstract elements, such as event transitions, as key deciding factors to detect machine versus human texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T18:42:09Z)
• Deciphering Textual Authenticity: A Generalized Strategy through the Lens of Large Language Semantics for Detecting Human vs. Machine-Generated Text [8.290557547578146]
  We introduce a novel system, T5LLMCipher, for detecting machine-generated text using a pretrained T5 encoder combined with LLM embedding sub-clustering. We find that our approach provides state-of-the-art generalization ability, with an average increase in F1 score on machine-generated text of 19.6% on unseen generators and domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T18:45:13Z)
• AI-generated text boundary detection with RoFT [7.2286849324485445]
  We study how to detect the boundary between human-written and machine-generated parts of texts. In particular, we find that perplexity-based approaches to boundary detection tend to be more robust to peculiarities of domain-specific data than supervised fine-tuning of the RoBERTa model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T17:48:19Z)
• MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild [82.70561073277801]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved human-level text generation, emphasizing the need for effective AI-generated text detection. We build a comprehensive testbed by gathering texts from diverse human writings and texts generated by different LLMs. Despite challenges, the top-performing detector can identify 86.54% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:13:29Z)
• On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detection [76.55825911221434]
  We argue that as machine-generated text approximates human-like quality, the sample size needed for detection bounds increases. We test various state-of-the-art text generators, including GPT-2, GPT-3.5-Turbo, Llama, Llama-2-13B-Chat-HF, and Llama-2-70B-Chat-HF, against detectors, including oBERTa-Large/Base-Detector, GPTZero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T17:47:39Z)
• Real or Fake Text?: Investigating Human Ability to Detect Boundaries Between Human-Written and Machine-Generated Text [23.622347443796183]
  We study a more realistic setting where text begins as human-written and transitions to being generated by state-of-the-art neural language models. We show that, while annotators often struggle at this task, there is substantial variance in annotator skill and that given proper incentives, annotators can improve at this task over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-24T06:40:25Z)
• Visualize Before You Write: Imagination-Guided Open-Ended Text Generation [68.96699389728964]
  We propose iNLG that uses machine-generated images to guide language models in open-ended text generation. Experiments and analyses demonstrate the effectiveness of iNLG on open-ended text generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T18:01:09Z)
• Controllable Text Generation with Focused Variation [71.07811310799664]
  Focused-Variation Network (FVN) is a novel model to control language generation. FVN learns disjoint discrete latent spaces for each attribute inside codebooks, which allows for both controllability and diversity. We evaluate FVN on two text generation datasets with annotated content and style, and show state-of-the-art performance as assessed by automatic and human evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-25T06:31:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.