Modeling Human Temporal Uncertainty in Human-Agent Teams

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04849v1
• Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 23:43:59 GMT
• Title: Modeling Human Temporal Uncertainty in Human-Agent Teams
• Authors: Maya Abo Dominguez, William La, James C. Boerkoel Jr
• Abstract summary: This paper builds a model of human timing uncertainty from a population of crowd-workers. We conclude that heavy-tailed distributions are the best models of human temporal uncertainty. We discuss how these results along with our collaborative online game will inform and facilitate future explorations into scheduling for improved human-robot fluency.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Automated scheduling is potentially a very useful tool for facilitating efficient, intuitive interactions between a robot and a human teammate. However, a current gapin automated scheduling is that it is not well understood how to best represent the timing uncertainty that human teammates introduce. This paper attempts to address this gap by designing an online human-robot collaborative packaging game that we use to build a model of human timing uncertainty from a population of crowd-workers. We conclude that heavy-tailed distributions are the best models of human temporal uncertainty, with a Log-Normal distribution achieving the best fit to our experimental data. We discuss how these results along with our collaborative online game will inform and facilitate future explorations into scheduling for improved human-robot fluency.

Related papers

• Real-time Addressee Estimation: Deployment of a Deep-Learning Model on the iCub Robot [52.277579221741746]
  Addressee Estimation is a skill essential for social robots to interact smoothly with humans. Inspired by human perceptual skills, a deep-learning model for Addressee Estimation is designed, trained, and deployed on an iCub robot. The study presents the procedure of such implementation and the performance of the model deployed in real-time human-robot interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T13:01:21Z)
• ManiCast: Collaborative Manipulation with Cost-Aware Human Forecasting [8.274511768083665]
  We present ManiCast, a novel framework that learns cost-aware human forecasts and feeds them to a model predictive control planner. Our framework enables fluid, real-time interactions between a human and a 7-DoF robot arm across a number of real-world tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T03:34:31Z)
• Learning Coordination Policies over Heterogeneous Graphs for Human-Robot Teams via Recurrent Neural Schedule Propagation [0.0]
  HybridNet is a deep learning-based framework for scheduling human-robot teams. We develop a virtual scheduling environment for mixed human-robot teams in a multiround setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T20:42:06Z)
• It Takes Two: Learning to Plan for Human-Robot Cooperative Carrying [0.6981715773998527]
  We present a method for predicting realistic motion plans for cooperative human-robot teams on a table-carrying task. We use a Variational Recurrent Neural Network, VRNN, to model the variation in the trajectory of a human-robot team over time. We show that the model generates more human-like motion compared to a baseline, centralized sampling-based planner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T17:59:23Z)
• Intuitive and Efficient Human-robot Collaboration via Real-time Approximate Bayesian Inference [4.310882094628194]
  Collaborative robots and end-to-end AI, promises flexible automation of human tasks in factories and warehouses. Humans and cobots will collaborate helping each other. For these collaborations to be effective and safe, robots need to model, predict and exploit human's intents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-17T23:04:44Z)
• Model Predictive Control for Fluid Human-to-Robot Handovers [50.72520769938633]
  Planning motions that take human comfort into account is not a part of the human-robot handover process. We propose to generate smooth motions via an efficient model-predictive control framework. We conduct human-to-robot handover experiments on a diverse set of objects with several users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-31T23:08:20Z)
• Show Me What You Can Do: Capability Calibration on Reachable Workspace for Human-Robot Collaboration [83.4081612443128]
  We show that a short calibration using REMP can effectively bridge the gap between what a non-expert user thinks a robot can reach and the ground-truth. We show that this calibration procedure not only results in better user perception, but also promotes more efficient human-robot collaborations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-06T09:14:30Z)
• Joint Mind Modeling for Explanation Generation in Complex Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks [83.37025218216888]
  We propose a novel explainable AI (XAI) framework for achieving human-like communication in human-robot collaborations. The robot builds a hierarchical mind model of the human user and generates explanations of its own mind as a form of communications. Results show that the generated explanations of our approach significantly improves the collaboration performance and user perception of the robot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T23:35:03Z)
• Human-Robot Team Coordination with Dynamic and Latent Human Task Proficiencies: Scheduling with Learning Curves [0.0]
  We introduce a novel resource coordination that enables robots to explore the relative strengths and learning abilities of their human teammates. We generate and evaluate a robust schedule while discovering the latest individual worker proficiency. Results indicate that scheduling strategies favoring exploration tend to be beneficial for human-robot collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T19:44:22Z)
• Is the Most Accurate AI the Best Teammate? Optimizing AI for Teamwork [54.309495231017344]
  We argue that AI systems should be trained in a human-centered manner, directly optimized for team performance. We study this proposal for a specific type of human-AI teaming, where the human overseer chooses to either accept the AI recommendation or solve the task themselves. Our experiments with linear and non-linear models on real-world, high-stakes datasets show that the most accuracy AI may not lead to highest team performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-27T19:06:28Z)
• Human Grasp Classification for Reactive Human-to-Robot Handovers [50.91803283297065]
  We propose an approach for human-to-robot handovers in which the robot meets the human halfway. We collect a human grasp dataset which covers typical ways of holding objects with various hand shapes and poses. We present a planning and execution approach that takes the object from the human hand according to the detected grasp and hand position.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-12T19:58:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.