Evaluating Factuality in Generation with Dependency-level Entailment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.05478v2
• Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 06:35:58 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Factuality in Generation with Dependency-level Entailment
• Authors: Tanya Goyal, Greg Durrett
• Abstract summary: We propose a new formulation of entailment that decomposes it at the level of dependency arcs. We show that our dependency arc entailment model trained on this data can identify factual inconsistencies in paraphrasing and summarization better than sentence-level methods.
• Score: 57.5316011554622
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Despite significant progress in text generation models, a serious limitation is their tendency to produce text that is factually inconsistent with information in the input. Recent work has studied whether textual entailment systems can be used to identify factual errors; however, these sentence-level entailment models are trained to solve a different problem than generation filtering and they do not localize which part of a generation is non-factual. In this paper, we propose a new formulation of entailment that decomposes it at the level of dependency arcs. Rather than focusing on aggregate decisions, we instead ask whether the semantic relationship manifested by individual dependency arcs in the generated output is supported by the input. Human judgments on this task are difficult to obtain; we therefore propose a method to automatically create data based on existing entailment or paraphrase corpora. Experiments show that our dependency arc entailment model trained on this data can identify factual inconsistencies in paraphrasing and summarization better than sentence-level methods or those based on question generation, while additionally localizing the erroneous parts of the generation.

Related papers

• Likelihood as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that likelihoods serve as an effective gauge for language model performance. We propose two methods that use question likelihood as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• Enhancing Systematic Decompositional Natural Language Inference Using Informal Logic [51.967603572656266]
  We introduce a consistent and theoretically grounded approach to annotating decompositional entailment. We find that our new dataset, RDTE, has a substantially higher internal consistency (+9%) than prior decompositional entailment datasets. We also find that training an RDTE-oriented entailment classifier via knowledge distillation and employing it in an entailment tree reasoning engine significantly improves both accuracy and proof quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T18:55:17Z)
• Learning to Filter Context for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [75.18946584853316]
  Generation models are required to generate outputs given partially or entirely irrelevant passages. FILCO identifies useful context based on lexical and information-theoretic approaches. It trains context filtering models that can filter retrieved contexts at test time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T18:41:54Z)
• An Invariant Learning Characterization of Controlled Text Generation [25.033675230270212]
  Controlled generation refers to the problem of creating text that contains stylistic or semantic attributes of interest. We show that the performance of controlled generation may be poor if the distributions of text in response to user prompts differ from the distribution the predictor was trained on.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T21:35:08Z)
• Revisiting text decomposition methods for NLI-based factuality scoring of summaries [9.044665059626958]
  We show that fine-grained decomposition is not always a winning strategy for factuality scoring. We also show that small changes to previously proposed entailment-based scoring methods can result in better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T09:54:37Z)
• Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Data [50.09608320112584]
  We argue that for complex language understanding tasks, all simple feature correlations are spurious. We theoretically analyze the difficulty of creating data for competency problems when human bias is taken into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T21:34:10Z)
• Plot-guided Adversarial Example Construction for Evaluating Open-domain Story Generation [23.646133241521614]
  Learnable evaluation metrics have promised more accurate assessments by having higher correlations with human judgments. Previous works relied on textitheuristically manipulated plausible examples to mimic possible system drawbacks. We propose to tackle these issues by generating a more comprehensive set of implausible stories using em plots, which are structured representations of controllable factors used to generate stories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T20:19:24Z)
• Partially-Aligned Data-to-Text Generation with Distant Supervision [69.15410325679635]
  We propose a new generation task called Partially-Aligned Data-to-Text Generation (PADTG) It is more practical since it utilizes automatically annotated data for training and thus considerably expands the application domains. Our framework outperforms all baseline models as well as verify the feasibility of utilizing partially-aligned data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-03T03:18:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.