Characterizing and Comparing COVID-19 Misinformation Across Languages, Countries and Platforms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.06455v2
• Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:23:26 GMT
• Title: Characterizing and Comparing COVID-19 Misinformation Across Languages, Countries and Platforms
• Authors: Golshan Madraki, Isabella Grasso, Jacqueline Otala, Yu Liu, Jeanna Matthews
• Abstract summary: Misinformation about COVID-19 has been rampant on social media around the world. In this study, we investigate COVID-19 misinformation on social media in multiple languages.
• Score: 4.394522448038107
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Misinformation/disinformation about COVID-19 has been rampant on social media around the world. In this study, we investigate COVID-19 misinformation/ disinformation on social media in multiple languages - Farsi (Persian), Chinese, and English, about multiple countries - Iran, China, and the United States (US), and on multiple platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Weibo, and WhatsApp. Misinformation, especially about a global pandemic, is a global problem yet it is common for studies of COVID-19 misinformation on social media to focus on a single language, like English, a single country, like the US, or a single platform, like Twitter. We utilized opportunistic sampling to compile 200 specific items of viral and yet debunked misinformation across these languages, countries and platforms emerged between January 1 and August 31. We then categorized this collection based both on the topics of the misinformation and the underlying roots of that misinformation. Our multi-cultural and multilingual team observed that the nature of COVID-19 misinformation on social media varied in substantial ways across different languages/countries depending on the cultures, beliefs/religions, popularity of social media, types of platforms, freedom of speech and the power of people versus governments. We observe that politics is at the root of most of the collected misinformation across all three languages in this dataset. We further observe the different impact of government restrictions on platforms and platform restrictions on content in Iran, China, and the US and their impact on a key question of our age: how do we control misinformation without silencing the voices we need to hold governments accountable?

Related papers

• News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal Cross-Country Perspective [49.1574468325115]
  This study investigated information consumption in four European countries. It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T16:22:10Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• ArCovidVac: Analyzing Arabic Tweets About COVID-19 Vaccination [7.594204373985492]
  We release the first largest manually annotated Arabic tweet dataset, ArCovidVac, for the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. The dataset is enriched with different layers of annotation, including, (i) Informativeness (more vs. less importance of the tweets); (ii) fine-grained tweet content types (e.g., advice, rumors, restriction, authenticate news/information); and (iii) stance towards vaccination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T16:19:21Z)
• Cross-lingual COVID-19 Fake News Detection [54.125563009333995]
  We make the first attempt to detect COVID-19 misinformation in a low-resource language (Chinese) only using the fact-checked news in a high-resource language (English) We propose a deep learning framework named CrossFake to jointly encode the cross-lingual news body texts and capture the news content. Empirical results on our dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of CrossFake under the cross-lingual setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T04:44:02Z)
• A First Look at COVID-19 Messages on WhatsApp in Pakistan [6.336355456383468]
  COVID-19 has prompted extensive online discussions, creating an infodemic' on social media platforms such as WhatsApp and Twitter. We present the first analysis of COVID-19 discourse on public WhatsApp groups from Pakistan.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-18T07:56:24Z)
• A System for Worldwide COVID-19 Information Aggregation [92.60866520230803]
  We build a system for worldwide COVID-19 information aggregation containing reliable articles from 10 regions in 7 languages sorted by topics. A neural machine translation module translates articles in other languages into Japanese and English. A BERT-based topic-classifier trained on our article-topic pair dataset helps users find their interested information efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-28T01:33:54Z)
• Analysis of misinformation during the COVID-19 outbreak in China: cultural, social and political entanglements [6.256108383411306]
  COVID-19 resulted in an infodemic, which could erode public trust, impede virus containment, and outlive the pandemic itself. The evolving and fragmented media landscape is a key driver of the spread of misinformation. Our findings shed light on the distinct characteristics of misinformation during the COVID-19 and offer insights into combating misinformation in China and across the world at large.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T01:34:08Z)
• Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic: Modeling the Perspective of Journalists, Fact-Checkers, Social Media Platforms, Policy Makers, and the Society [37.9389191670008]
  COVID-19 has been declared one of the most important focus areas of the World Health Organization. Fighting this infodemic has been declared one of the most important focus areas of the World Health Organization. We release a large dataset of 16K manually annotated tweets for fine-grained disinformation analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T18:04:20Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
• COVID-19 on Social Media: Analyzing Misinformation in Twitter Conversations [22.43295864610142]
  We collected streaming data related to COVID-19 using the Twitter API, starting March 1, 2020. We identified unreliable and misleading contents based on fact-checking sources. We examined the narratives promoted in misinformation tweets, along with the distribution of engagements with these tweets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T09:48:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.