News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal Cross-Country Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05487v2
• Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:50:37 GMT
• Title: News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal Cross-Country Perspective
• Authors: Anees Baqir, Alessandro Galeazzi, Fabiana Zollo
• Abstract summary: This study investigated information consumption in four European countries. It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
• Score: 49.1574468325115
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The Internet and social media have transformed news availability and accessibility, reshaping information consumption and production. However, they can also facilitate the rapid spread of misinformation, posing significant societal challenges. To combat misinformation effectively, it is crucial to understand the online information environment and news consumption patterns. Most existing research has primarily focused on single topics or individual countries, lacking cross-country comparisons. This study investigated information consumption in four European countries, analyzing three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK and focusing on the role of misinformation sources. Our work offers a perspective on how topics of European significance are interpreted across various countries. Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries and topics. While most users engage with reliable sources, a small percentage consume questionable content. Interestingly, few users have a mixed information diet, bridging the gap between questionable and reliable news in the similarity network. Cross-country comparisons revealed differences in audience overlap of news sources, offering valuable guidance for policymakers and scholars in developing effective and tailored solutions to combat misinformation.

Related papers

• From Nuisance to News Sense: Augmenting the News with Cross-Document Evidence and Context [25.870137795858522]
  We present NEWSSENSE, a novel sensemaking tool and reading interface designed to collect and integrate information from multiple news articles on a central topic. NEWSSENSE augments a central, grounding article of the user's choice by linking it to related articles from different sources. Our pilot study shows that NEWSSENSE has the potential to help users identify key information, verify the credibility of news articles, and explore different perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T21:15:11Z)
• Towards Corpus-Scale Discovery of Selection Biases in News Coverage: Comparing What Sources Say About Entities as a Start [65.28355014154549]
  This paper investigates the challenges of building scalable NLP systems for discovering patterns of media selection biases directly from news content in massive-scale news corpora. We show the capabilities of the framework through a case study on NELA-2020, a corpus of 1.8M news articles in English from 519 news sources worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T23:36:45Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• Online search is more likely to lead students to validate true news than to refute false ones [0.32207415805366035]
  This work focuses on understanding how young people perceive and deal with false information. Our results suggest that online search is more likely to lead students to validate true news than to refute false ones. This work provides a principled understanding of how young people perceive and distinguish true and false pieces of information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T09:43:32Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• How to Effectively Identify and Communicate Person-Targeting Media Bias in Daily News Consumption? [8.586057042714698]
  We present an in-progress system for news recommendation that is the first to automate the manual procedure of content analysis. Our recommender detects and reveals substantial frames that are actually present in individual news articles. Our study shows that recommending news articles that differently frame an event significantly improves respondents' awareness of bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T10:13:23Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• An Agenda for Disinformation Research [3.083055913556838]
  Disinformation erodes trust in the socio-political institutions that are the fundamental fabric of democracy. The distribution of false, misleading, or inaccurate information with the intent to deceive is an existential threat to the United States. New tools and approaches must be developed to leverage these affordances to understand and address this growing challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T19:32:36Z)
• Mining Disinformation and Fake News: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancements [55.33496599723126]
  disinformation including fake news has become a global phenomenon due to its explosive growth. Despite the recent progress in detecting disinformation and fake news, it is still non-trivial due to its complexity, diversity, multi-modality, and costs of fact-checking or annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-02T21:01:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.