Assessing the Readiness of Greece for Autonomous Vehicle Technologies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.07297v1
• Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:57:25 GMT
• Title: Assessing the Readiness of Greece for Autonomous Vehicle Technologies
• Authors: Chrysostomos Mylonas, Charis Chalkiadakis, Alexandros Dolianitis, Dimitris Tzanis, Evangelos Mitsakis
• Abstract summary: The case of Greece is assessed by finding relevant sources that support and justify any assessment. Regardless of the outcome concerning the readiness of Greece, such an assessment should help identify areas in which focus should be given.
• Score: 58.720142291102135
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Despite the debate regarding the timeframe and rate of penetration of Autonomous Vehicles, their potential benefits and implications have been widely recognized. Therefore, assessing the readiness of individual countries to adopt such technologies and adapt to their introduction is of particular importance. This paper aims to enrich our understanding of EU readiness regarding the introduction of autonomous vehicle technologies by assessing the case of Greece. Thus, through a literature review, the criteria upon which such an assessment should be based are established and analyzed. Subsequently, the case of Greece is assessed based on those criteria by finding relevant sources that support and justify any assessment. Regardless of the outcome concerning the readiness of Greece, such an assessment should help identify areas in which focus should be given in order to ensure a smoother transition to such technologies. This contribution is expected to assist policy makers in Greece.

Related papers

• The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
  We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z)
• The Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) in the AI Act: Roots, legal obligations and key elements for a model template [55.2480439325792]
  Article aims to fill existing gaps in the theoretical and methodological elaboration of the Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) This article outlines the main building blocks of a model template for the FRIA. It can serve as a blueprint for other national and international regulatory initiatives to ensure that AI is fully consistent with human rights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T11:55:55Z)
• Pessimistic Evaluation [58.736490198613154]
  We argue that evaluating information access systems assumes utilitarian values not aligned with traditions of information access based on equal access. We advocate for pessimistic evaluation of information access systems focusing on worst case utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T15:40:09Z)
• Ethical AI Governance: Methods for Evaluating Trustworthy AI [0.552480439325792]
  Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (TAI) integrates ethics that align with human values. TAI evaluation aims to ensure ethical standards and safety in AI development and usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T09:25:50Z)
• An evidence-based methodology for human rights impact assessment (HRIA) in the development of AI data-intensive systems [49.1574468325115]
  We show that human rights already underpin the decisions in the field of data use. This work presents a methodology and a model for a Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA) The proposed methodology is tested in concrete case-studies to prove its feasibility and effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T16:27:52Z)
• A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [58.6354685593418]
  This paper proposes several article-level, field-normalized, and large language model-empowered bibliometric indicators to evaluate reviews. The newly emerging AI-generated literature reviews are also appraised. This work offers insights into the current challenges of literature reviews and envisions future directions for their development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z)
• Ethics in conversation: Building an ethics assurance case for autonomous AI-enabled voice agents in healthcare [1.8964739087256175]
  The principles-based ethics assurance argument pattern is one proposal in the AI ethics landscape. This paper presents the interim findings of a case study applying this ethics assurance framework to the use of Dora, an AI-based telemedicine system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:04:59Z)
• How to Evaluate Explainability? -- A Case for Three Criteria [0.0]
  We will provide a multidisciplinary motivation for three quality criteria concerning the information that systems should provide. Our aim is to fuel the discussion regarding these criteria, such as adequate evaluation methods for them will be conceived.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-01T11:22:50Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systems [76.79703106646967]
  We develop a value-based assessment framework that visualizes closeness and tensions between values. We give guidelines on how to operationalize them, while opening up the evaluation and deliberation process to a wide range of stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-09T19:28:32Z)
• Rethinking Sustainability Requirements: Drivers, Barriers and Impacts of Digitalisation from the Viewpoint of Experts [1.6576670364158894]
  This paper focuses on the notions of drivers, barriers and impacts that a system can have on the environment in which it is deployed. We interview 30 cross-disciplinary experts in the representative domain of rural areas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-06T17:39:25Z)
• A Formal Critique of the Value of the Colombian P\'aramo [0.0]
  This article presents conceptual and methodological frameworks to prioritise interventions on the Colombian P'aramo. We contend that the valuation of ecosystem services and the ecosystem services framework fail to examine value-based categories. We set out to formalise a (computational) dialogical scenario where arguments stating distinct, and often contradictory, actions delineate possible forms of appropriating the P'aramo.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-03T11:49:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.