Second layer data governance for permissioned blockchains: the privacy management challenge

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11677v1
• Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:19:38 GMT
• Title: Second layer data governance for permissioned blockchains: the privacy management challenge
• Authors: Paulo Henrique Alves, Isabella Z. Frajhof, Fernando A. Correia, Clarisse de Souza, Helio Lopes
• Abstract summary: In pandemic situations, such as the COVID-19 and Ebola outbreak, the action related to sharing health data is crucial to avoid the massive infection and decrease the number of deaths. In this sense, permissioned blockchain technology emerges to empower users to get their rights providing data ownership, transparency, and security through an immutable, unified, and distributed database ruled by smart contracts.
• Score: 58.720142291102135
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Data privacy is a trending topic in the internet era. Given such importance, many challenges emerged in order to collect, manage, process, and publish data. In this sense, personal data have got attention, and many regulations emerged, such as GDPR in the European Union and LGPD in Brazil. This regulation model aims to protect users' data from misusage and leakage and allow users to request an explanation from companies when needed. In pandemic situations, such as the COVID-19 and Ebola outbreak, the action related to sharing health data between different organizations is/ was crucial to develop a significant movement to avoid the massive infection and decrease the number of deaths. However, the data subject, i.e., the users, should have the right to request the purpose of data use, anonymization, and data deletion. In this sense, permissioned blockchain technology emerges to empower users to get their rights providing data ownership, transparency, and security through an immutable, unified, and distributed database ruled by smart contracts. The governance model discussed in blockchain applications is usually regarding the first layer governance, i.e., public and permissioned models. However, this discussion is too superficial, and they do not cover compliance with the data regulations. Therefore, in order to organize the relationship between data owners and the stakeholders, i.e., companies and governmental entities, we developed a second layer data governance model for permissioned blockchains based on the Governance Analytical Framework principles applied in pandemic situations preserving the users' privacy and their duties. From the law perspective, we based our model on the UE GDPR in regard to data privacy concerns.

Related papers

• Smart Contract Coordinated Privacy Preserving Crowd-Sensing Campaigns [4.204990010424083]
  Crowd-sensing has emerged as a powerful data retrieval model, enabling diverse applications by leveraging active user participation. Traditional methods like data encryption and anonymization, while essential, may not fully address these issues. This paper proposes a system utilizing smart contracts and blockchain technologies to manage crowd-sensing campaigns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T08:41:57Z)
• Differentially Private Data Release on Graphs: Inefficiencies and Unfairness [48.96399034594329]
  This paper characterizes the impact of Differential Privacy on bias and unfairness in the context of releasing information about networks. We consider a network release problem where the network structure is known to all, but the weights on edges must be released privately. Our work provides theoretical foundations and empirical evidence into the bias and unfairness arising due to privacy in these networked decision problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T08:37:37Z)
• SoK: The Gap Between Data Rights Ideals and Reality [46.14715472341707]
  Do rights-based privacy laws effectively empower individuals over their data? This paper scrutinizes these approaches by reviewing empirical studies, news articles, and blog posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T21:52:51Z)
• Data-Driven Dystopia: an uninterrupted breach of ethics [0.0]
  The article presents instances of data breaches and data harvesting practices that violate user privacy. It also explores the concept of "Weapons Of Math Destruction" (WMDs) The article highlights the need for companies to take responsibility for safeguarding user information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-13T14:56:18Z)
• More Data Types More Problems: A Temporal Analysis of Complexity, Stability, and Sensitivity in Privacy Policies [0.0]
  Data brokers and data processors are part of a multi-billion-dollar industry that profits from collecting, buying, and selling consumer data. Yet there is little transparency in the data collection industry which makes it difficult to understand what types of data are being collected, used, and sold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T15:21:24Z)
• Distributed Machine Learning and the Semblance of Trust [66.1227776348216]
  Federated Learning (FL) allows the data owner to maintain data governance and perform model training locally without having to share their data. FL and related techniques are often described as privacy-preserving. We explain why this term is not appropriate and outline the risks associated with over-reliance on protocols that were not designed with formal definitions of privacy in mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:44:05Z)
• Preventing Unauthorized Use of Proprietary Data: Poisoning for Secure Dataset Release [52.504589728136615]
  We develop a data poisoning method by which publicly released data can be minimally modified to prevent others from train-ing models on it. We demonstrate the success of our approach onImageNet classification and on facial recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T19:12:34Z)
• The Challenges and Impact of Privacy Policy Comprehension [0.0]
  This paper experimentally manipulated the privacy-friendliness of an unavoidable and simple privacy policy. Half of our participants miscomprehended even this transparent privacy policy. To mitigate such pitfalls we present design recommendations to improve the quality of informed consent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T14:16:48Z)
• A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for international data markets [77.34726150561087]
  Despite data protection laws and an acknowledged right to privacy, trading personal information has become a business equated with "trading oil" An open conflict is arising between business demands for data and a desire for privacy. We propose and test a vision of a personal information market with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.