Differentially Private Data Release on Graphs: Inefficiencies and Unfairness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05246v1
• Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 08:37:37 GMT
• Title: Differentially Private Data Release on Graphs: Inefficiencies and Unfairness
• Authors: Ferdinando Fioretto, Diptangshu Sen, Juba Ziani,
• Abstract summary: This paper characterizes the impact of Differential Privacy on bias and unfairness in the context of releasing information about networks. We consider a network release problem where the network structure is known to all, but the weights on edges must be released privately. Our work provides theoretical foundations and empirical evidence into the bias and unfairness arising due to privacy in these networked decision problems.
• Score: 48.96399034594329
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Networks are crucial components of many sectors, including telecommunications, healthcare, finance, energy, and transportation.The information carried in such networks often contains sensitive user data, like location data for commuters and packet data for online users. Therefore, when considering data release for networks, one must ensure that data release mechanisms do not leak information about individuals, quantified in a precise mathematical sense. Differential Privacy (DP) is the widely accepted, formal, state-of-the-art technique, which has found use in a variety of real-life settings including the 2020 U.S. Census, Apple users' device data, or Google's location data. Yet, the use of DP comes with new challenges, as the noise added for privacy introduces inaccuracies or biases and further, DP techniques can also distribute these biases disproportionately across different populations, inducing fairness issues. The goal of this paper is to characterize the impact of DP on bias and unfairness in the context of releasing information about networks, taking a departure from previous work which has studied these effects in the context of private population counts release (such as in the U.S. Census). To this end, we consider a network release problem where the network structure is known to all, but the weights on edges must be released privately. We consider the impact of this private release on a simple downstream decision-making task run by a third-party, which is to find the shortest path between any two pairs of nodes and recommend the best route to users. This setting is of highly practical relevance, mirroring scenarios in transportation networks, where preserving privacy while providing accurate routing information is crucial. Our work provides theoretical foundations and empirical evidence into the bias and unfairness arising due to privacy in these networked decision problems.

Related papers

• Consistent community detection in multi-layer networks with heterogeneous differential privacy [4.451479907610764]
  We propose a personalized edge flipping mechanism that allows data publishers to protect edge information based on each node's privacy preference. It can achieve differential privacy while preserving the community structure under the multi-layer degree-corrected block model. We show that better privacy protection of edges can be obtained for a proportion of nodes while allowing other nodes to give up their privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T22:49:55Z)
• Group Decision-Making among Privacy-Aware Agents [2.4401219403555814]
  Preserving individual privacy and enabling efficient social learning are both important desiderata but seem fundamentally at odds with each other. We do so by controlling information leakage using rigorous statistical guarantees that are based on differential privacy (DP) Our results flesh out the nature of the trade-offs in both cases between the quality of the group decision outcomes, learning accuracy, communication cost, and the level of privacy protections that the agents are afforded.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T01:38:01Z)
• A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
  Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing. Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data. Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z)
• Cross-Network Social User Embedding with Hybrid Differential Privacy Guarantees [81.6471440778355]
  We propose a Cross-network Social User Embedding framework, namely DP-CroSUE, to learn the comprehensive representations of users in a privacy-preserving way. In particular, for each heterogeneous social network, we first introduce a hybrid differential privacy notion to capture the variation of privacy expectations for heterogeneous data types. To further enhance user embeddings, a novel cross-network GCN embedding model is designed to transfer knowledge across networks through those aligned users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T06:22:37Z)
• Large-Scale Privacy-Preserving Network Embedding against Private Link Inference Attacks [12.434976161956401]
  We address a novel problem of privacy-preserving network embedding against private link inference attacks. We propose to perturb the original network by adding or removing links, and expect the embedding generated on the perturbed network can leak little information about private links but hold high utility for various downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T13:59:39Z)
• Post-processing of Differentially Private Data: A Fairness Perspective [53.29035917495491]
  This paper shows that post-processing causes disparate impacts on individuals or groups. It analyzes two critical settings: the release of differentially private datasets and the use of such private datasets for downstream decisions. It proposes a novel post-processing mechanism that is (approximately) optimal under different fairness metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-24T02:45:03Z)
• Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy [70.818129585404]
  We experimentally demonstrate that networks, trained with differential privacy, in some settings might be even more vulnerable in comparison to non-private versions. We study how the main ingredients of differentially private neural networks training, such as gradient clipping and noise addition, affect the robustness of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T18:59:24Z)
• Deep Directed Information-Based Learning for Privacy-Preserving Smart Meter Data Release [30.409342804445306]
  We study the problem in the context of time series data and smart meters (SMs) power consumption measurements. We introduce the Directed Information (DI) as a more meaningful measure of privacy in the considered setting. Our empirical studies on real-world data sets from SMs measurements in the worst-case scenario show the existing trade-offs between privacy and utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-20T13:41:11Z)
• Differential Privacy of Hierarchical Census Data: An Optimization Approach [53.29035917495491]
  Census Bureaus are interested in releasing aggregate socio-economic data about a large population without revealing sensitive information about any individual. Recent events have identified some of the privacy challenges faced by these organizations. This paper presents a novel differential-privacy mechanism for releasing hierarchical counts of individuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T18:19:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.