Uncertainty Aware Semi-Supervised Learning on Graph Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.12783v2
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 23:21:58 GMT
- Title: Uncertainty Aware Semi-Supervised Learning on Graph Data
- Authors: Xujiang Zhao, Feng Chen, Shu Hu, Jin-Hee Cho
- Abstract summary: We propose a multi-source uncertainty framework using a graph neural network (GNN) for node classification predictions.
By collecting evidence from the labels of training nodes, the Graph-based Kernel Dirichlet distribution Estimation (GKDE) method is designed for accurately predicting node-level Dirichlet distributions.
We found that dissonance-based detection yielded the best results on misclassification detection while vacuity-based detection was the best for OOD detection.
- Score: 18.695343563823798
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Thanks to graph neural networks (GNNs), semi-supervised node classification
has shown the state-of-the-art performance in graph data. However, GNNs have
not considered different types of uncertainties associated with class
probabilities to minimize risk of increasing misclassification under
uncertainty in real life. In this work, we propose a multi-source uncertainty
framework using a GNN that reflects various types of predictive uncertainties
in both deep learning and belief/evidence theory domains for node
classification predictions. By collecting evidence from the given labels of
training nodes, the Graph-based Kernel Dirichlet distribution Estimation (GKDE)
method is designed for accurately predicting node-level Dirichlet distributions
and detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) nodes. We validated the outperformance
of our proposed model compared to the state-of-the-art counterparts in terms of
misclassification detection and OOD detection based on six real network
datasets. We found that dissonance-based detection yielded the best results on
misclassification detection while vacuity-based detection was the best for OOD
detection. To clarify the reasons behind the results, we provided the
theoretical proof that explains the relationships between different types of
uncertainties considered in this work.
Related papers
- Online GNN Evaluation Under Test-time Graph Distribution Shifts [92.4376834462224]
A new research problem, online GNN evaluation, aims to provide valuable insights into the well-trained GNNs's ability to generalize to real-world unlabeled graphs.
We develop an effective learning behavior discrepancy score, dubbed LeBeD, to estimate the test-time generalization errors of well-trained GNN models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-15T01:28:08Z) - Uncertainty in Graph Neural Networks: A Survey [50.63474656037679]
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been extensively used in various real-world applications.
However, the predictive uncertainty of GNNs stemming from diverse sources can lead to unstable and erroneous predictions.
This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the GNNs from the perspective of uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T21:54:52Z) - Improvements on Uncertainty Quantification for Node Classification via
Distance-Based Regularization [4.121906004284458]
Deep neural networks have achieved significant success in the last decades, but they are not well-calibrated and often produce unreliable predictions.
We propose a distance-based regularization that encourages clustered OOD nodes to remain clustered in the latent space.
We conduct extensive comparison experiments on eight standard datasets and demonstrate that the proposed regularization outperforms the state-of-the-art in both OOD detection and misclassification detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-10T00:00:20Z) - Uncertainty Propagation in Node Classification [9.03984964980373]
We focus on measuring uncertainty of graph neural networks (GNNs) for the task of node classification.
We propose a Bayesian uncertainty propagation (BUP) method, which embeds GNNs in a Bayesian modeling framework.
We present an uncertainty oriented loss for node classification that allows the GNNs to clearly integrate predictive uncertainty in learning procedure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-03T12:18:23Z) - Energy-based Out-of-Distribution Detection for Graph Neural Networks [76.0242218180483]
We propose a simple, powerful and efficient OOD detection model for GNN-based learning on graphs, which we call GNNSafe.
GNNSafe achieves up to $17.0%$ AUROC improvement over state-of-the-arts and it could serve as simple yet strong baselines in such an under-developed area.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-06T16:38:43Z) - NUQ: Nonparametric Uncertainty Quantification for Deterministic Neural
Networks [151.03112356092575]
We show the principled way to measure the uncertainty of predictions for a classifier based on Nadaraya-Watson's nonparametric estimate of the conditional label distribution.
We demonstrate the strong performance of the method in uncertainty estimation tasks on a variety of real-world image datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-07T12:30:45Z) - Graph Posterior Network: Bayesian Predictive Uncertainty for Node
Classification [37.86338466089894]
Uncertainty estimation for non-independent node-level predictions is under-explored.
We propose a new model Graph Posterior Network (GPN) which explicitly performs Bayesian posterior updates for predictions on nodes.
GPN outperforms existing approaches for uncertainty estimation in the experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-26T20:41:20Z) - The Hidden Uncertainty in a Neural Networks Activations [105.4223982696279]
The distribution of a neural network's latent representations has been successfully used to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) data.
This work investigates whether this distribution correlates with a model's epistemic uncertainty, thus indicating its ability to generalise to novel inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-05T17:30:35Z) - Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under
Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation.
We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.